Essay on The Reality of Human Cloning

Certain terms relative to cloning should be determined prior to the primary argument. Firstly, we may define cloning as “The act of asexually

Reproductive human cloning is a form of asexual reproduction done in a lab, not by a sperm fertilizing an egg. This issue has been a hot topic for the past decade after Dolly the sheep was cloning in Scotland. Dolly was the first cloned mammal, whose very existence created much heat in the general public (Hansen, pg. 235, in Vaughn). Many people believe that cloning is ethically immoral and should never be done, but others think that scientific advances can greatly cure diseases. What is human cloning? Human cloning is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human. Human cloning allows advanced technology to take an initiative in fixing defective genes, however are the precautions taken of what the future has in store? Cloning should not be an acceptable process in today’s society. By making cloning acceptable, we are saying that everyone has the right to make a replica of them or give permission for others to be cloned. We are also saying that other cloning methods will have the approval of the community and will be acceptable, yet morally so many religions would disapprove of this method. Picture this. A couple walks into a hospital and finds out that the baby they are having has Down Syndrome. If the couple decides to alter the gene of the embryo, the baby would be artificially made instead of natural. The concept of altering genes and human cloning is morally wrong because of the possibility of aging faster, loss of individuality, and religious and ethical view

There are many unknown results if we were to pursue the cloning research. Even though the promises of cloning sound wonderful, look at Victor Frankenstein who creates his monster and ends up regretting it. His life has changed dramatically since his creation caused many problems. The creation was a failure since his expectations of the monster were not met. Science does not have every answer, but it is about the means of furthering it. Furthering the research of cloning is very childish and hopefully no one considers it and ending up like Victor Frankenstein. With these facts, it is clearly understandable not to further the research of human

the right to have a child as long as the child born is unharmed. Some

Cloning has definitely advanced over the past few decades. Ever since 1996 , when the first animal was cloned, scientists have been doing research to try to figure out a way to clone a human. I, however, do not like this idea. Why should something so unnatural and inhuman be able to be done in our lives? Some may argue that cloning is good for helping those with diseases , but where do we cross the line?

Technology has enabled people to realize many things their ancestors would not have even dreamed of. Cloning is absolutely one of them. Having identical twins without being born on the same they is like a dream come true. But what is cloning exactly? Cloning ,particularly in biotechnology, is the process used to create copies of DNA fragment, cells, or organisms. Attempts at cloning might go back to much earlier times such as the attempt made by Hans Dreisch in the late 1800’s to clone a sea urchin, but it was not until 1951, when the first successful clone of frog egg was created, that goal was finally achieved. Still, the world had to wait for another 44 years before the first mammal was cloned. It was certainly sensational when the first cloned mammal, a sheep named Dolly was born on 5th July 1996. Since it was a milestone in human story, Dolly gained a world-wide fame overnight and took its place in the front pages of many newspapers and even tabloids next to celebrities. However, there is a painful twist to this otherwise happy story because the death of Dolly at the age of six brought about an intense debate particularly about the ethical side of cloning and it has been a controversial issue ever since. Despite of all the debate it has caused among

The concept of cloning has been around since the 1800’s, although, in the field of scientists, it has slowly been evolving into a vigorously debated topic, throughout the last 3 decades. Cloning is essentially defined as the process of artificially reproducing genetically identical organisms. Scientists all around the world, through research, are still learning more about the topic, but the fascinating process officially gained awareness as a result of a 1986 experiment conducted by Ian Wilmut, scientist at the Roslin Institute in Scotland. The project was essentially centred around a sheep referred to as “Dolly” that was cloned in a lab using a frozen mammary cell from another adult sheep. At the time, this was a significant milestone in

Cloning is the process of manipulating DNA and embryonic stem cells to create an identical living organism. The purpose of cloning is to find medical treatments and to reduce human suffering (Rosalyn). Is it wrong? Is it disrespectful toward nature itself? According to Sir John Gordon, cloning is not as playing God it is simply copying “what nature has already produced” (Gordon). This new development established a series of debates because if there are technologies that enable humans to artificially create mammal, sooner or later the same process will be performed on human. This points to the question, should human cloning be banned? (Cloning: An Overview). Even though there are numerous critics who believe human cloning

Society should not rush to make up its mind about cloning; it should wait and see if the good outweighs the bad. It is obvious that cloning raises many serious issues that will be hotly debated all over the world.

For the last few decades, cloning was a fictitious idea that lay deep within the pages of sci-fi novels and movies. The very idea that cloning could one day become reality was thought to be a scientific impossibility by many experts. But on February 22, 1997, what was thought to be purely science fiction became reality. That day, a team from the Roslin Institute, led by Dr. Ian Wilmut, changed the history forever by revealing what looked like an average sheep. And its name was Dolly. Dolly became one of the most famous if not the most famous sheep in modern day. She was the first ever clone of a mammal. She was an exact biological carbon copy, a laboratory counterfeit of her mother. This news shocked the world for

In the novel Scientific and Medical Aspects of Human Reproductive Cloning, written by a committee of scientist and engineers, state that society will be the overall decision maker for human cloning (2003, p. xi). Many individuals in society currently do not approve of the human cloning research process. Some are concerned that the cloned child would have issues with its self identity. and some believe that cloning a human is overall morally wrong. The prospect of social identity problems arises from what Nestor Morales, a Professor of Psychology at New York, cites that cloned children, “knowing that they have been a planned to be a copy from another problem, … , may diminish their sense on uniqueness” (Morales, 2009, p. 44). Objectors state there can be a potential problem

Because the American community is currently so largely against cloning, President Clinton has passed a ban on federal funding of human cloning research, and asked privately funded researchers to stop their work for the time being. In three to five years, however, Congress is going to review the issue to see if the ban is still needed. "Whether upon such further deliberation our nation will conclude that the use of cloning techniques to create children should be allowed or permanently banned is, for the moment, an open question," says the National Bioethics Advisory Committee (Executive Summary 2). Since there is going to be a re-discussion of the issue in a few years, I think every person needs to think about where they stand on human cloning. But before we can do this, we need to understand just what cloning is, and how it works.

Time is an ally, allowing for the accrual of further data from animal experiments, an assessment of the prospective safety and efficiency of the procedure in humans, and a period of fuller national debate on ethical and social concerns. If cloning is to be implemented sometime in the near future, all these issues must be

Cloning is mostly found in Sci-Fi books and movies. However, cloning has become something scientists in today’s society are striving toward. Scientists are hoping to clone humans in the near future. The idea of cloning may seem like an exciting idea to some people, but the idea is actually very harmful. Cloning is an unethical practice and should be outlawed due to the moral issues and the health problems caused in cloned organisms.

In the past, discussion about human cloning was present within the realms of science fiction and fantasy. After the successful cloning of the sheep “Dolly” in 1997, it became evident that eventually, scientists may be able to clone human beings. This possibility has incited both support and opposition. Newspapers and magazines have described cloning as an exciting step forward which allows genetic engineers to reduce the uncertainties of reproduction, but they have also published commentaries by scientists, religious figures, and others who see human cloning as an attack on human dignity. What's the big deal?