preview

The Reconstruction Amendments: A Case Study

Decent Essays

The Reconstruction Amendments The Reconstruction Amendments, referring to the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments, were controversial additions to The Constitution after the Civil War (Schweikart & Allen, 2004). The intention of this paper is to define each amendment, define each section of these amendments, and explain how they changed society from before they were put into effect. This paper will also explain how the Reconstruction Amendments changed the relationship between people and their government, both state and federal. Although the Civil War had ended and the Emancipation Proclamation had freed slaves, an assassin’s bullet had struck down America’s instrument of peace, President Abraham Lincoln, and created a roadblock …show more content…

The Thirteenth Amendment is as follows:
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation (“Thirteenth Amendment (ratified 1865)”, 2016, para. 2-3). The first section of the Thirteenth Amendment bans slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for crimes. After the Civil War, not only was slavery banned, but also other enslaving practices such as peonage (“Thirteenth Amendment”, 2016). With this amendment, America would start fresh without any form of immoral bondage. The second section simply gave Congress the power to “enforce” the Amendment (“Thirteenth Amendment”, …show more content…

Sandford (1857) by recognizing all people born in America as American citizens (except for non-taxpaying Native Americans) in order to give former slaves the same rights granted to white citizens (Vile, 2016, Fourteenth Amendment). Congress introduced another bill, the Freedmen’s Bureau Bill in 1866, which permitted military trial to those who violated personal rights (Vile, 2016, Fourteenth Amendment). Congress was trying to create equal rights while mending the bridge between blacks and former Confederates with these two bills, but the public rejected them (Vile, 2016, Fourteenth Amendment). Alone, the Thirteenth Amendment was not enough. “Although the Thirteenth Amendment had abolished slavery, doubts remained as to whether it provided adequate authority for the protection of other civil and political rights that had traditionally rested with the states” (Vile, 2016, Fourteenth Amendment, para. 3). The Thirteenth Amendment was critical, but something else was necessary to create acceptance of equal rights: The Fourteenth

Get Access