The Redeeming Qualities of South Park Essay

If this episode was a slice of cake, it would be delicious. It begins with all of the children of South Park in Cartman’s living room telling Alexa to add various vulgarities to their shopping list. Alexa dutifully complies sending the boys into raucous laughter. From here, there is a cut scene to a town pub where a group of disgruntled camouflage clad confederate flag wielding white men are complaining about Alexa and other automated request devices stealing their jobs. There is another cutscene as the audience is placed into the filming of an episode of a brand new show “ White People Renovating Houses”. The show’s host and creator is Stan, Kyle’s father. The show’s theme and name is a spoof on HGTV’s abundance of home flipping shows. While

Most individuals, including teenagers, do support the idea of censorship, yet to a degree should it be used. Yes, the functionality strips capabilities for some to not watch or read what others do, but it is because they are being protected from the dangers these illustrations articulate. Consider it overprotection, and consider it a benefit to the innocence children

To conclude not the government nor authority needs to censor it to take the power of their piece away from writers and directors is cruel. Taking the art out of the show makes it uninteresting. Information is the key to unity without information we will be in a dark age where we go backwards and become uninformed. But to censor or not to censor that is the question. in society we live in should not every censor one person ever because we need to be united as one soiled unit. If you ever write a story or a play or anything for that matter would you want somebody to censor your art or whatever because they get offended i would guess no. so that is why censorship needs to cease to exist

Censorship in children 's cartoons is something that has a largely negative effect both on children and the art industry as a whole. Censorship can push itself on any number of topics: on violence, on love, on lgbt visibility, and on death. Censoring these scenes only serves to negate the sense of seriousness given to an issue. For instance, if you take away the possibility of a character getting injured or dying during a conflict, you lower the stakes, thus making whatever plot progression may be occurring unimportant, inconsequential even. This kind of censorship can ruin the entire point of a story, or even leave plot holes in its storyline. Censorship like this is especially prevalent in cartoons when being aired outside of their original country.

Americans hate the word censorship. It puts fire into the eyes of any self proclaimed, speaker of the people. but is censorship that bad, or that wrong? Censorship is an enormous part of the stability of society. One of the many types of censorship takes place on the airwaves. Comedians, George Carlin, Howard Stern, and Mncow Muller had an enormous effect on the ideals of censorship in this era, trying to prove that the FCC had no right to censor radio airwaves. They questioned why words we all hear at home cannot be spoken on the radio if listeners are given a proper warning. However, there is no need for young children to be exposed to such lude material and the American people must be more

What South Park portrays counters the suggestion made in the article by Balko. Balko makes the points of rewarding a healthy choice but in South Park the opposite is done. Cartman was

Do you wonder why sometimes you watch Tv and a curse word has been said but instead of hearing the word you hear a *beep*. That is called Censorship, “ society should be allowed to limit children access to materials not suitable to their age.” (Censorship is the way to go). It shields children from corrupt ideas, Foul language, and images. Censorship also can protect our nation.

The video entitled “The Spirit Of Christmas”, depicted Jesus and Santa Claus having a fight to the death over the values of the holiday. The video gained so much attention that Matt and Trey was called up by comedy central and was offered to do a full feature show1. With 18 seasons behind it, the show has become an iconic pop-culture show. The episode which I am analysing is entitled “It hits the fan” and it follows the four protagonist boys who lives in a small town named South Park which is located in Colorado. In the episode, a new TV show is going to briefly say the word “shit”.

The show parodies George Clooney, Carl Reiner, Ben Affleck, and other privileged celebrities. Therefore, one can conclude that the actual critique of the show in this context is not motivated by politically ideology but rather by a generalized ideology of proper moral behavior. Elitist celebrities who are self-righteous are engaged in the same type of judging as conservative Christians such as Flanders in “The Simpsons.” Indeed, “South Park” often critiques traditional religious institutions, notably the Roman Catholic Church. One episode depicts the Church as a harbor for pedophiles, while another episode depicts the Church as absurdly superstitious. Elitist judging is the target of South Park’s critiques of liberal

Censorship is harmful in many ways, children shouldn’t be exposed to the negative things that go on throughout social media, tv, and the streets. Censorship is needed to protect children from danger and censoring children from this adult content will probably more than likely keep children in their right minds. We want kids to see the preater things until they are prepared.

Why is crude language used in television? Some people think that the crude language used in television serves no purpose and shows that a program was made by a bunch of idiots, intellectually, who cannot think of anything intelligent to say. On the other side of the spectrum, people could argue that vulgar language in movies or television serves as a way to make fun or to interpret stupidity in our society. In the comedic movie South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut, the main characters, Stan, Kyle, Cartman, and Kenny sneak into an R-rated animated musical called Terrance and Phillip ‘Asses of Fire’, which uses a high volume of crude language. This movie was so terrible that everybody in the movie theatre left, while the only people that stayed through the whole film were Stan, Kyle, Cartman, and Kenny. After the movie, the boys were using all the crude language that they had learned from the movie Terrance and Phillip. The creators of South Park, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, use crude language throughout their episodes to represent the social issues in America. The creators use the crude language to cause attention, to practice their freedom of speech in America, and to rebel against censorship in television which contributes to the success of this program. South Park discusses issues prevalent in today’s society and encourages people to practice their freedom of speech, which is why this program should be watched by more people.

There are many issues in our society that affect our children and country. Censorship has been around for many years and probably will not go away. Society is helped through censorship by protecting our military, vulnerable children, and people who are influenced by others.

Do you ever wonder what life would be like if everybody accepted everything? There would be no such thing as censorship because nothing would offend anybody! It would be a utopia for free expression. If we step back from this daydream and focus on reality, you would realise that that is never the case. We see a lot of “concerned” people whining about things like violent video games,TV, and other types of media all the time. People need to not be so sensitive to the environment around them. In the case of TV, I do not think foul language should be banned or censored. The Parents should decide what their kids should watch, not the FCC.

To begin, one episode of South Park that deals extensively with the prominence of safe spaces is the aptly named “Safe Space.” This episode portrays many of the main characters along with a handful of celebrity parodies attempting to ignore reality by creating safe spaces, blocking out any form of “bullying.” This is mainly achieved through Butters, who is essentially forced to screen Cartman’s, Demi Lovato’s, and many other’s social media comments and only give them the positive ones (Parker, “Safe Space”). Eventually, Butters can no longer carry the weight of the negative comments he must parse through and suffers a nervous breakdown as well as hallucinations of “reality” tormenting him for his work, leading to Butters throwing himself out of a second-story window, nearly killing himself.

Like all children’s shows and movies, it let’s the mind run free, and also let’s the children be imaginative within their own realm of mind. So let’s not take these away, and just try to limit what they watch. Let us rate these shows and movies. Oh yeah, the government did that. But yet parents still let children watch the movies and shows that they did not want to watch in the first place. Is there something wrong here? Parents complain, laws are passed to limit what