demonstrated “by clear and convincing evidence that” the claim was filed within the one-year deadline, the “claim for asylum will be rejected” (Asthana, 2011, p.37). Asthana (2011) refutes this practice, as “Article 33(1) of the Refugee Convention prohibits the return of a refugee to a country where […] life would be threatened on account of […] race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion” (p.38). Consequently, concerns are raised, as a strict “enforcement
According to the 1951 Refugee Convention, states have the obligation to accept and protect refugees (REFERENCE). This indicated that so long individuals fit the definition of refugee status, states are compelled to accept and protect them. Unfortunately, that does not seem to be the case on a global level. According to international law, more specifically the 1951 Refugee Convention, refugees are to be taken in and are to be provided housing, education, and other services in their host country (REFERENCE)
the resettling and protection of those who have fled from the war and violence of their country. The Refugee Convention of 1951, and the Protocol of 1967 were the first rights and regulations that were laid down by many nations (including Australia) to ensure the protection of refugees would remain constant throughout the world. By signing it, Australia committed to providing rights to any refugee that would arrive in Australia, and helped to reduce the number of displaced people after the tragedy
Background Toylan Zelinski (“our client”), a Ukraine national, has applied for refugee status based on his homosexuality. A few days ago, Ukraine State authorities convicted our client, in absentia, for engaging in homosexual activities. As per your email of October 28, 2016, you have asked me to research on the possible impact of the above-mentioned conviction on our client’s immigration and refugee application in Canada. You have specifically asked me to address the following two questions: Issues:
international refugee protection regime In the aftermath of the WWII and the beginning of the Cold War tensions, the UNHCR began its mandate of addressing the issues of refugees as defined by the 1951 Geneva Convention with thirty-three staff and a $30,000 budget (Feller, 2001:131). Reflecting post-colonial European hegemonic structure and ignoring the upheavals of decolonisation in the ‘Third World,’ geographic and temporal limitations were embedded within the definition of a refugee. The convention recognises
of creating an asylum mechanism in north Cyprus which is becoming a destination for refugees especially due to the unrest in Middle East. The findings will be analyzed in the framework of international human rights and UN documents related to the refugee rights issue. Introduction Cyprus is placed in a region which has been suitable for refugees throughout history. At the time of World War II, when Nazi’s endangering Europe; more or less 2000 Polish refugees came to Cyprus in 1940, defected until
spelled in the convention face consequences such as censure by the UN. Countries in Africa and America were experiencing large-scale displacement due to the consequences of armed conflicts. Further, it was found that 1951 Convention articles could not guarantee the protection of the population. As a result, the region has formulated their own laws to address the issues affecting the region but this is anchored in the 1951 Convention. For example in an Africa, Article 1(2) of OAU Convention of 1969 and
3.1 Who are Stateless Persons: The 1954 Stateless Convention (hereinafter the 1954 convention) describes the definition of a stateless person and specifies the treatment to be accorded to stateless persons by contracting states. Pursuant to this Convention, stateless person is “a person who is not considered as a national by any sate under the operation of its law.” The 1954 convention provides: For the purpose of this convention, the term “stateless person” means a person who is not considered
only when these actions are formulated and implemented that tragic loss of lives at the sea will be eliminated and the rights of vulnerable refugees will be sincerely protected (Spilimbergo, 2016). Human right violations of women refugee In the beginning of the refugee crisis in Europe, the number of women was higher compared to that of women and children. However, this phenomenon is changing and the number of women and children is outnumbering that of adult men from Libya, Syria, and other affected
than 10 percent of this group were recognized as refugees, since they did not complete the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees definition. More than one million and a half people were left helpless in the gray area rejected by South Africa and unable to return and survive in Zimbabwe. Oxford professor, Alexander Betts, argues that in order to avoid similar situations the definition of ‘refugee’ should be expanded to include survival migrants; people who are outside their country of origin