The Refugees At Our Door Analysis

Terrorist, sleeper cells and undeserving; these are all adjectives that Americans have used to describe Syrian refugees. This type of bigotry is an issue that must be addressed. In light of the recent attack on Paris, there has been a dramatic shift to block President Obama’s plan to bring 10,000 additional refugees into the United States. Imagine that, a nation of immigrants blocking other immigrants from entering. In order to gain this kind of overwhelming support for such a bill, propagandists have used countless personal attacks on an entire race and claim that it is in the name of national security. Rather than lock down the borders, the United States should take California’s model for vetting refugees and make it the federal

It is no surprise that America has a lot of immigrants in the country, approximately 61 million (newsmax). However, America has been letting refugees in the country since World War II, saying: “Since World War II, the United States has accepted millions of refugees fleeing communism and totalitarianism around the world” (Bier). Now this can come into shock to many people who did not know this, and it should be. Why ban some immigrants/refugees now when we have been letting them in for many years. Many months before Trump was president, the Obama administration had successfully brought more than 10,000 Syrian refugees,saying: “More recently, the ongoing conflict in Syria has displaced six-in-ten Syrians, or 12.5 million, from their homes, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of global refugee data. In fiscal 2016, the Obama administration resettled 12,587 Syrian refugees, more than 20% above the original target” (Krogstad). Now this was before Trump banned refugees from Syria to come to America, which really shows you that we have been doing this time, and this was very normal. The Obama administration wanted to keep going into letting Syrian refugees in, but Trump is stopping them, saying: ‘The policies of the incoming Trump administration may affect the flow of refugees into the U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has said he backs “extreme

“I swear with my heart that nothing has happened to people like what is happening now in Syria. People are dying for nothing and in very bad ways. Nothing in the world is like that. If they find your body, they will chop into pieces and throw it into the streets like garbage.”(Goodspeed Peter) This evidence proves this claim because this home is not safe for Hiyam Kholi, because people are dying for no reason, and that could be her. America has to let immigrants come to America in this circumstance, and for many other reasons, to protect them from things like this. If America can do this there would be less innocent people dying, and they would safe in America than any other place that is dangerous. Letting a certain amount of immigrants can be a great way to protect immigrants because someone big, and powerful is allowing them in. “president Barack Obama has directed the U.S government to accept at least 10,000 immigrants from Syria in the next fiscal year”.(Eilperin juliet) This evidence proves my claim, because someone as big and powerful in this government will allow immigrants not to be scared to come to America. Immigrants should not be afraid of America because we will take care of them just so nothing bad happens to them. If America is able to keep

was founded by immigrants and, with the exception of indigenous people, every person living in the U.S. is an immigrant or a descendant of an immigrant” (Dakwar 50). Knowing what people know about the origins of America, not allowing Muslim people or Syrians as a whole to take refuge makes Americans the hypocrisy of society. “Discriminating so overtly by religion, barring 1.6 billion people from entering the country, would be inconsistent with America’s rejection of religious discrimination and place the United States firmly outside international law, putting it in conflict with the founding charter of the United Nations and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” (Abramsky 72). By not allowing the same thing to happen that founded the country they live in, Americans are effectively tearing down the system and the beliefs that they created. Dakwar reasonably and accurately states the product of the demise of this system, “Yet every new wave of immigrants has faced fear and hostility, especially during times of economic hardship, political turmoil, or war” (50). Not only is there a general message showing through that clearly represents the negative effects that can come of beliefs and taking action based on these principles, there are also specific examples of disasters that came about from similar situations. If anything, society should take something from history and learn from it, as that’s the only way to

America is the country of hopes and dreams. We have many principles that make our country great. For example, we have freedom, rights, equality, and having the nickname “Melting Pot.” Over many centuries, America has accepted immigrants and refugees of multiple nationalities and backgrounds to live up to their famous nickname. However; why should we stop accepting refugees now? Even though many Americans assume accepting refugees will ruin our country, we should accept Syrian refugees into the United States because the Refugee Crisis is a serious problem, accepting refugees is an act of Congress, and helping refugees is the humane thing to do.

Syrian refugees today and German-Jewish refugees during the 1930's share many difficulties. Both the articles, "Fresno Family Represents the Plight of Syrian Refugees," and "Jews' Tale Plays Out Again as Syrian Refugees Find Resistance to US Entry" both prove that the Jews and Syrians issues are very similar. The US denied the German-Jewish refugees entrance, and now we are doing the same again with almost all of the Syrian refugees. The Jews from Germany in the 1930's during the Holocaust and the refugees from Syria today both face many hardships such as plight, prejudice, and discrimination, not to mention that they were, and are, criticized harshly.

Taking in refugees from countries in a crisis is a basic humanitarian act. I have witnessed this first hand with my dad mentoring a refugee from South Sudan and helping him get on his feet, and now he is extremely successful. The difference from twenty years ago when the Sudanese were refugees today is that there is the risk of safety. In the Middle East, especially Syria, there is no way to be able to verify that the refugees are just civilians and have no hatred for the U.S. Until there is a way to totally be able to verify that the refugees are totally risk free it is not worth the risk of taking them. We has a country has to learn from what is happening in Europe because of the sheer number of refugees that were allowed into their countries. It would be silly to make the same mistakes and risk having the similar outcome of repeated terror attacks, and whole groups of people choosing not to assimilate to Western culture. While Syria is in a humanitarian crisis and they need help, the safety of the United States and its people is the most important thing and cannot be risked. The only evidence needed is that in Europe where there are terrorist attacks almost every single

People no matter what race, gender, ethnicity, or religion should be able to immigrate to a country to seek freedom and justice. People immigrate from all different places around the world to escape suffering or torment from countries in which they lived. In this past 2016 election there has been a major shift on the lives of immigrants as they try to enter the United States of America. President Donald Trump has ordered an immigration ban which bars immigrants for 90 days from entering the United States from seven predominantly Muslim countries which includes Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. Even more strikingly, it also bans all refugees for 120 days, and Syrian refugees indefinitely. Even though the president is supposedly attempting to suppress terror within the U.S, he is targeting people from distinct religious groups, an action that has deemed truly unjust within our Constitution. In doing so, he is separating innocent families, banning students from re-entering their university, and preventing helpless children begin a new life in a seemingly free country.

Currently in Syria there is a civil war going on that has led thousands of refugees to flee to other countries. Many people in these countries are debating on whether or not these refugees should be allowed within their borders. Leaving these debates and questions of moral standing out of it I believe in my own opinion that it would be best not to allow them into the United States. Allowing them to enter our borders could have drastic consequences that could leave a huge burden on our country, and the society that dwells within it.

Over 12 million immigrants reside within the U.S illegally, but many people do not believe that harsh policies should be placed against these people. Meanwhile, others are pushing for strong regulations both for preventing further illegal immigration, and for placing restrictions on immigration as is. This division can be traced to several arguments that only further the divide. While both sides have valid arguments, the ban of both travel and immigration to America following the travel ban issued by President Trump, can only hurt the nation. The turning away of refugees is morally and ethically wrong. However, more is at stake here. The turning away of refugees merely forces hopeful refugees into the arms of the terrorist regimes that they

Over 300,000 refugees are waiting at the borders of our country waiting to be accepted into our country. My question is why. Why would our great country want to weaken ourselves by letting illnesses and terrorism into our country, especially when they did not help us in the past? The United States should not accept refugees because of many reasons including terrorism, stealing jobs from U.S citizens and bringing sickness and unknown illnesses into our country. Hundreds and hundreds of terrorist attacks have occurred in our country the only blameable menace are us letting in refugees in. Thousands of refugees are working immediately, and illnesses are spreading to Americans in our country as soon as these refugees enter our country. Knowing all of these issues is it really worth letting them in?

Whether you say we should welcome the refugee with an open arm or deny them, we still need an ability to understand all perspectives. We need to understand this problem and make decisions based on thorough understanding. The refugee propaganda should be stopped and we need to start viewing them as people instead of terrorists. Let us not forget that “50% of them are children” and they can easily become ill and are forced to quit school. And maybe we should think about what we would have done if religious or terrorist was not associated with them. Let us not forget; we are writing history right now. Is this how we want the future to remember America?

An individual group named ISIS has been leading terrorist attacks throughout many countries. They are a group of extremists practicing their belief of world domination. In 2011, They attacked Syria which led to many Syrians to flee their country. They have now become the largest group of refugees. Since then the United States has allowed about 1,500 refugees to enter the country. After the attack on Paris by ISIS, many governors have refused the resettlement of Syrian refugees in their state. The United States should stop allowing Syrian refugees as it increases the endangerment to the nation’s citizens.

Are they good for our economy? Are they going to harm the people of our nation ? Do we have enough resources to support their needs? Taking in refugees is a big problem that many countries face. In America these refugees are the Syrian refugees, trying to the escape the triumph of the Syrian war. The Syrian war is a civil war between the Republic and the Independence. This war is causing thousands of Syrian civilians to lose the homes and to be in constant danger of war. Under the Obama administration, the U.S. was expected to take in thousands of refugees from the Syrian war. But ever since President Trump was elected, all of this has come to a halt and no Syrian refugees are being let into America. Syrian refugees should be let into the United States of America because refugees will not have an impact on our national security, and the refugees could ultimately help the economy, and America messed up once and should not do it again.

The issue of refugees heated up when President Donald Trump became president. He is totally against of letting refugees into the United States. As most people who aren’t refugees don’t really care what he does, but people who are refugees would have a different story. The UN has never really had any issues towards refugees until Donald Trump had became president. The growth of refugees has increased because of war, being discarded from the country, or not following the right religion. Historically we have let many refugees come into our country in the past. According to The Washington Post, “global displacement levels declined to a historic low in 2005 but started escalating again because of a series of conflicts, including the U.S. invasion of Iraq. By mid-2015, the total number of refugees and internally displaced people had climbed to an all-time high of more than 60 million people, the UNHCR estimates — reflecting both the masses of people newly uprooted from war-torn regions of Syria and South Sudan, as well as those displaced years ago from places like Pakistan and Afghanistan who still haven't been able to return home.” So throughout the history, many refugees have been fleeing their countries but letting refugees into the United States, it could cause a lot of problems like it would cost the UN more money, there are billions of refugees why not help them all, and there could be terrorist in the group. What this evidence suggests is that this is a very significant