The Reign Of Terror Is Justified Dbq Essay

The Reign of Terror was not justified because it abused human rights.‘’Revolutionary Government denied legal counsel to accused enemies which went against human right.‘’In 1793, a revolutionary campaign was launched against the Catholic Church. Sunday worship, christmas, and easter were abolished.’’(Document _A_and C_)This facts proves that they took way people freedom they are not allowed to have any religious holiday. The Revolutionary they have been ended up all religions practice. The Reign of Terror were not justified because they abused the human rights and they did not protect the human rights.

The French Revolution is arguably the bloodiest period in French history, with men such as Maximilien Robespierre leading the country into a situation of state sponsored terror. Originally being quite a liberal thinker inspired by the works of Rousseau, Robespierre quickly gained a reputation for being a radical throughout the course of the Revolution, especially during the Terror. Early on terror was justified as a means to root out foreign and domestic enemies of the Revolution, however; once the foreign threat had been taken care of it became increasingly difficult for Robespierre to rationalize his use of terror to bring about a supposed Republic of Virtue. In his speech, the “Justification of the use of Terror” which he presented to

In 1793 and 1794, were conditions in France serious enough to require such a violent response by the revolutionary government.The Reign of Terror lasted less than two years, from the execution of Louis XVI in January 1793 to late July 1794.During those eighteen months, more than 20,000 French people were put to death by guillotine.The behavior by the revolutionary French government was not justified because Any society that invents the machine to publicly cut off people’s heads is off base. The action is unjustified because it is barbaric.The reign of terror was not justified because Robespierre’s s Desperate times required desperate measures not justified In a government that says it values liberty, passing a law like the levee en mass is unjust because it requires people to do things they do not want to do wrong in a government that says it values freedom and liberty. The revolutionary government made too many demands on individuals who were right to rebel against the oppressive revolutionary government. speech sounds rational, but he is out of touch. When a government has to “smother” its own citizens in order to eliminate individuals who challenge it, the government is not promoting freedom.To lay the foundations of democracy and the rule of law, rulers need to follow democracy and the rule of law, not the blade of terror. Any society that invents the machine to publicly cut off people’s heads is off base. The action is unjustified because it is barbaric.Nine people

Was the Reign of Terror justified? No, they persecuted people for their Beliefs, is that right? No, not at all. The Reign of Terror lasted for about 2 years from January 1793 to late July 1794. During those two years more than 20,000 French people were killed by Guillotine. The Guillotine was regarded as a humane way to execute criminals. It was a sharp, angled blade which dropped quickly on a guided track, beheading the man or woman.

The methods were too extreme for the people of France to handle (Document C). The Rebellion of Vendee has killed over 80,00 French people! The people of France do not have to be in a battle against each other! Document E,, explains how Tribunals were accused for absolutely anything; even though if they were innocent. The National convention did not allow lawyers.

This was demonstrated during the secondary source, written by Steven Otfinoski, to inform the reader how the court would trial or punish prisoners. As stated, “ At first, the tribunal followed a formalized legal procedure, but that gradually broke down. The accused were denied lawyers. Conviction based on patriotic “intuition” rather than evidence was allowed, In Paris, while some members of the upper classes were acquitted…” (Document E). This illustrates how the activities were unjustifiable. Since, convection was based on patriotic “intuition”, rather than evidence. Also, not enough rules were set to protect individual rights. Not long after this something very similar happened during the letter from the Vendee, in 1793, it states, “And at this moment there are three thousand national guardsmen in the region to establish order” (Document D). This illustrates how big the revolt was. It also demonstrates how the terror was not justified since the people were still upset about the dismantling of the catholic church and for being forced to draft into the military. So, to conclude I don’t think the Internal threat was justifiable by any

Secondly, many churches in France have been closed by the government. In document A, it shows that when the French government put in place the Festival Of Reason, it was known as the new republican way of church, replacing Roman Catholic churches into Christian and Catholic churches. This also, made people revolt against the government, because the French government banned churches during the replacement. This caused people to be upset and not happy with the government by taking away their right of freedom of

In 1789 the French felt that their basic needs were not being met and revolted against the monarchy. The National Convention, which was the new pro-French Revolution government, created a new constitution that gave the people rights called the Declaration of the Rights of Man. As a man named Robespierre came to power, he began something called the Reign of Terror to try and stop the revolts happening in France. This was a time of mass killings and executions where evidence was no longer needed to be accused or sentenced. If the Reign of Terror was just going to be like the monarchy in order to switch back to a Republic later on, than the Reign of Terror was just as bad and unjustified as the horrible way the monarchy treated its citizens before. This is largely due to the fact that it hugely benefitted Robespierre and the rest of the National Convention by creating fear and panic in order to stop revolts against them. The Reign of Terror was unjustified because it was just like the monarchy in the fact that they took away the rights they had just given to the

The Reign of Terror did not start until September 5, 1793 (doc B). The National Convention however has been receiving threats from both in and outside of the country since at least 1791. In 1791, on August 27, Austria and Prussia showed their support for the French monarchy. There was no drastic action taken to stop these two countries from spreading such thoughts, until 1792 where a war broke out, but wars are not uncommon between countries. Plus, this war wasn’t really unethical.

King Louis XVI and Marie Antionette were two people that should not have been ruling a country. King Louis was always gone on hunting trips and Marie Antionette spent every dime of French money. Once the Monarchy ran out money, they started to tax the Third, and poorest, estate. The third estate took up 97% of the population. 97% of the population was starving and the royal family kept spending large amounts of money until the people revolted. The people of France tried to reason with King Louis, but he refused to change his ways and kept taxing the third estate. When the people revolted, they stormed the Bastille and took all of the weapons they could. The people then went to the King’s palace and demanded he fix the way he was ruling before they killed him. The King didn’t listen and was executed along with his wife. Of the three kids that Marie Antionette had, the two boys died of Tuberculosis in jail and the daughter was sent to live the remainder of her life in exile in Austria. It may seem as though the people of France had successfully overgrown their monarchy and could begin a life of freedom, however this is not the case. The French had rushed into combat too fast and did not have a plan for what to do after they had killed their rulers. The right of Terror begins where Maximilian Robespierre beheads 40,000 people in the span of ten months for speaking against the revolution. In the end, Robespierre ends up getting

The rights that the revolution has promised the people of France were being taken away. In doc A the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizens article 7 states that no person shall be accused, arrested, or imprisoned, except in the cases [allowed] by law, article 9 states that all persons are held innocent until they shall have been declared guilty, and article 10 states that no one should be silenced on account of his opinions, including his religious views. But, in document E it states that a careless word of criticism spoken against the

Initially, the methods of the Terror became too extreme as Robespierre’s thirst for blood and power grew. In October 1793, the pro-revolutionaries decided to make an example of the counterrevolutionaries by setting their homes on fire and chopped off 12 heads within five minutes. (Doc C) As a way to protest and change the society that most French despised government officials changed holidays, events, and the calendar. In 1793, a revolutionary campaign against the Catholic Church Sundays were abolished, Christmas, Easter, every Christian

Following the French Revolution, the National Convention and Robespierre as the head of the Committee of Public Safety, employed drastic measures to achieve their goals, however managed to successfully consolidate power as demonstrated by the overall success of the revolution. Whilst the revolution itself was a momentous undertaking, nothing was quite as dramatic as the execution of King Louis XVI that was orchestrated by the National Convention. “The king must die so that the country can live.” This ushered in a new era in France’s history and meant the revolutionaries would have to work hard to secure power given the hostile reaction to the execution by both

Existing in France between the years of 1793 and 1794, The Reign of Terror, was a course of brutality, bloodshed, and clash. The Reign of Terror began as a response to the French Revolution to ensure it would succeed against the counterrevolutionaries. The majority of the French people were in awful states before the revolution, and wanted France to be a republic. This confirms that the rationality of the Reign of Terror because they were successful in defeating the counterrevolutionaries, and the beliefs of the French were supported. Seeing as how France continued to be a republic with improved lives for the citizens the long term affect was constructive for the country. Hence, the extreme year that was the Reign of Terror is justified because

From autumn 1793 to midsummer 1794, I was guillotined by people, and also many people were arrested and executed by guillotine. This is called the Reign of Terror. This was led by Robespierre. The people who were died because of this terror were almost innocent people.