preview

The Relationship Between Fate And Free Will In Oedipus

Good Essays

Sophocles’ tragedy Oepdius Tyrannus details the downfall of a man fighting with all his might against destiny. Oedipus goes so far as to portray the relationship between predetermined fate and free choice is portrayed as being antagonistic in nature. Ultimately, the play concludes that free will, though it does exist, acts secondarily to fate. The submissive nature of free will is not clear to the Greeks of Sophocles’ tragedy, and so Oedipus and the other characters in the play constantly attempt to escape their fate. Sophocles uses the metaphors of sight and blindness to carefully articulate the dichotomy between destiny and free will. The entrance of the blind prophet Tiresias early in the play serves as Sophocles’ introduction of the idea that blindness to the physical world allows for perception of the true and the false. For Tiresias, this means that he is able to see the realities of the present and future. Oedipus accuses Tiresias’ mind of being “as blind as his eyes” (Sophocles 375); Tiresias on multiple occasions will respond by foreshadowing Oedipus’ later self-blinding. Tiresias predicts that “[Oedipus’] keen eyes will see only darkness,” (Sophocles 419) after he finds out the truth of his birth. This indicates that not only is Oedipus fated to “mate with [his] mother… [and] kill [his] father,” (Sophocles 792, 794), but that he is also doomed to be blinded. Tiresias is a servant of Apollo, a god of oracles and prophecy; therefor, Tiresias must be a servant of

Get Access