Why Is The Roman Empire Better Than The Republic

The Roman Empire suffered many problems in its final years. One of these problems was the rodent population. Another was the sanitation problem. Another one was the water supply problem.

The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire both made advancements in the way of life, but both ended with their own conflicts and civil wars. Both kingdoms lasted about the same amount of time making it difficult to distinguish which one was greater. They both show times of great conquest and demolishing civil wars. The two were similar in their expansion of land, language, and resources. At the same time, they were very different with their views on government, religion, and leaders (Compare and Contrast the Roman Republic with the Roman Empire).

Some policies and institutions of the Roman Republic were useful to help them succeed in conquering first Italy and then the Mediterranean world. Before of the institution of the republic, the romans were a monarchy since their beginning and they were basically a pastoral people. Rome suffer several changes and improvements under the control of the Etruscan kings. The Etruscan were civilization settled north of Rome in Etruria, and they once had control over almost all the Italic peninsula. The Etruscans influences in Rome were profound, they transformed Rome from a pastoral community to a city (91). The Etruscan built the street and roads that help the development of temples, markets, shops, streets, and houses. They basically brought urbanization to Rome. It is fairly to say that the Rome republic was a fusion between the elements of the Etruscan civilization and the Rome elements. The combination of the different political institutions and policies made the Romans succeed in their conquest territories.

Was Rome more of a Republic or Empire? In a sense, Rome was a both a Republic and Empire throughout different times in history. At first, Rome was very much a Republic. It had no one leader and instead had many different elected representatives. The people of Rome could voice their opinions and influence the government. However, with the fall of the Republic, Rome soon became an Empire with only one leader. This leader, or emperor, usually did whatever they felt like and did not have to listen to those around them. Historians considered Rome to be a Republic at around 509 BC.

After Julius Caesar was assassinated, the Roman Republic was overruled and transformed into the Roman Empire. The Republic had many flaws including the fact that it was based on inheritance, it had no genuine voice for the lower class, women, or slaves, and it was not strong enough to govern effectively and keep its citizens happy during endless wars. Ancient Rome only truly became powerful when it became an empire.

In the beginning of the Roman Empire, the economy was booming and Pax Romana came and went. Rome began in 750 BC, and soon bringing power with it. The leaders in Rome changed from being a republic to being more military control. Their attitude on how to improve Rome was very military based and with great rulers to lead them. However, when Rome was coming to its end it was hard to control the Roman people and they were invaded by the Germanic tribes, but this rooted from a series of problems. Leaving the Roman empire to fall because of their military problems, political assassinations, and foreign invasions.

I think rome had a better system because they try to make more friends than enemies. By giving them more right and they. Athens made more enemies than friends. In doc c phargh 2 it says “ The Athens were more stingy with their citizenship but the Romans were more freely gave there’s away”. This makes Rome better because they have more people so that means that the Rome has more fighter and rich people.

The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire highly differ in their political structures. The republic: created in 509 BCE. was a form of representative democracy. It consisted of 2 consuls of which were appointed by the senate and then voted on. These consuls were the head officers and the were appointed for one year. The senate was one of two legislative bodies comprised of 300 senators and 10 tribunes who were all patricians. The other body was knows as the tribal assembly and was made up of plebeians who met in a forum to vote on things such as consuls.

To start off with, the governments were very different and ran completely different from each other. The Roman Empire had their ways of governing, allowing people to have a voice and be able to govern themselves. This

The Roman Republic was a “democratic” republic, which allowed first citizens to vote, and to choose their governors in the senate (Hence, their consuls). However, it was a nation ruled by its aristocracy, and, consequently, the entire Republic`s power was concentrated in a few individuals. Furthermore, the Senate was controlled by Patricians, which directed the government by using wealth to buy control and power over the decisions of the senate and the consuls. This situation aroused the inconformity of the people; as result, a civil war took place in the Republic (destroying it), and then the Roman Empire was born.

As Rome became independent from the Etruscan ruling, its government walked away from having a monarch and transformed into a Republic as a way to avoid the tyranny that many times comes with an absolute autocrat. Rigorous precautions were taken from the start in order to keep the power balanced. Moreover, the structure of the government was meant to be resilient to bad judgment. The structure of the Roman Republic with its government and law provided for a more just system.

Did you known that city of Rome was a republic nation that turned into an empire. Rome was once a Republic during the 509 BC ruled by senators. During the passing years, Rome was known as an empire in 27 BC by breakings of civil wars and because of it, Augustus was the nation's first emperor In Rome. Rome should have retraced into a Republic in year 180 AD because the people should have the right to vote for their leaders, citizen would have been ruled by a constitution, and there was no dictator to control citizens of Rome.

When articles are written about the fall of the Republic and the fall of democracy, the blame is often attributed to one man: Julius Caesar. However, a figure that tends to be overlooked in popular history held the consulship over fifty years prior to the Republic’s inevitable fall was named Gaius Marius. Coming from an obscure Volscian town in the territory of Arpinum, sixty miles south-east of Rome, Plutarch wrote of Marius coming from poor origins and rising to the consulship as an archetypal ‘rags to riches’ story. This is nothing more than dramatic flair, since in reality he came from a good municipal family who were members of the local aristocracy, with the contemporary view characterising them as powerful nobles in their native town.

Public health was developed by the Romans because they believed cleanliness was the key to good health. The Romans developed a large system of public health works around their empire. Like the Greeks, they believed that preventing illness was far more important than curing illness. Because they understood that dirty conditions made people ill, the Romans provided many facilities, such as: public baths, sewers, and toilets. Roman writer Celsus advised exercises before a meal, and bathing weak parts of the body, and physician Galen prescribed gym exercises and deep breathing as a way to health.

There was a Roman Revolution and it took place during the later years of the Roman Republic which had lasted 500 years from 509 BCE through 49 BCE. The process of Rome turning from a Republic to an Empire is due to many reasons. Brunt stated “the differences between factions, even when this term is taken to refer to small and transient groupings and not to the large cohesive, and long-lasting alliances of modern invention, are of far less significance that conflicts of principle and interests which divided optimates and poplars.” The Roman Republic had been around for nearly 500 years and during the later years of the Republic there was a division amongst the Optimates and the Populres. The Optimates held to the traditional forms of Roman