The Republican Debate

In 1854, the Republican Party was established as a response to controversial issues within the United States of America. The founders of this political party ‒ anti-slavery Whigs, former Democrats, former members of the Free Soil Party and Know-Nothing Party ‒ helped to identify their ideals prior to the Civil War.

This article could attract many Christian readers because he used the bible in his argument, but I don’t find Kavanaugh’s article to be persuasive and I had a hard time agreeing with his view. In my point of view church and state are two different institutions; not everything in the Bible can be apply in our government law. I didn’t like how he used the undocumented family’s status as a reason for them to be here illegally because it is not fair to the immigrants who worked hard and who loan money to come to United States. I admit that NAFTA could be one of the reasons of their sufferings in their life; it’s still not enough reason to immigrate to United States illegally. I didn’t like the argument that people who contribute to the community should not be labeled “illegal.” They should be called “illegal”, illegal means not authorized and as illegal

The argument was toward the challenge of the Defense of Marriage Act, which was an issue between the states Federal sales tax. The argument throughout the representatives, in a sense, was questionable and logical. During the argument, Paul Clement, an Attorney for Bipartisan, and Justice Sotomayor, a Supreme Court of Justice Lawyer, were fighting to what local states define same-sex marriage and how the federal laws pertaining to the taxes define whom the client of a spouse should pay the sales & property taxes. It was until more of the representatives and lawyers to comment into this argument about this situation.

At the beginning of the oral argument the appellant’s lawyer, Thomas I. Emerson was asked if the case was an equal opportunity case. He verbally stumbled and was delayed with his response to the Judges. The Judges asked several times why it was not being argued as an equal opportunity case due to the distinction that only married women received treatment and counsel from the Planned Parenthood Clinic. His only response was that was not the issue of this case.

Bates, that is arguing the case by explaining how taking away the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, is unlawful and was not based on actual justified reasons that proved why the DACA program should be terminated. In order to make this movement the judge gave the department of Homeland security the chance to come up with a decent reasoning that justifies the elimination of the mentioned program if they could not prove of this statement to be fair and reasonable they would have to keep accepting applications and renewals for the young people affiliated not by choice but by commitment to the

The liberals of the United States of America, and others who disapprove President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence are torn. Liberals would like for Donald Trump to be impeached from the presidency. But, if Trump is impeached, the vice president, Pence, would have to take over as the new president. This stirs up a lot of confused feelings; leaving liberals on the fence.

For a long time Americans have been under the impression that Republicans are for the people, but are they really? The Republican presidential candidates have many times been caught fabricating their campaign stories.These candidates are not properly trained for politics. The prior careers of the candidates range from CEO’s to just being flat out billionaires. How can you run a country without the proper training. It is absurd to me that people really are willing to place such a job in the hands of these people. You can not go from only being in charge of thousands of people to millions. You need to be politically trained to actually be able to make strategically good decisions for everyone in a country. The country deserves to fully know the

Did you know that every president that america had so far came from the united states? In all the years that the Presidential debate has be going on more and more people from different countries and since then won or lost. Would you want to have a president from a different country? I would want a president from a different country. I think that it would be better if we had the chance to expand our presidential line. People from all around the world would like the chance to have the experience of becoming the United States President.

What do I think? After reading NPRs fact check of the third presidential debate I maintain a different mindset than when I first endured the debate of our two presidential candidates. Although seeing the debate on tv might cause some voters to sway towards one candidate rather than the other it is apparent to me now that we are not always getting the full story. I am not as thoroughly educated as some of my peers or voters I do have an opinion on who I would vote for if I could and if I hadn't read this article my decision would have been made under false pretenses under the debate itself not the tangible evidence. This is a well known problem for americans voting without true understanding for the issues or for the suggested solutions, I didn't

After watching thirty minutes of both the Republican debate and the Democrat debate it is very evident the differences between the political parties. The Republican race is very different from the democratic debate because of the level of competition. After only a brief time in watching both races it is evident who the moderators feel are front runners in this year's election. The Republican debate was very competitive because of the larger amount of people running. Each candidate did not have enough time to fully debate topics because of there are just too many people up at the podium. Some of the Republican candidates make it priority to follows Reagan's rule of talking about the fellow candidates but, others such as Bush and Trump try

Presidential Debates! Those two words can either send an agonizing cringe down one 's spine or it can send nerve-wrecking excitement down one 's spine. Whichever way it may be taken, Presidential Debates are interweaved into America 's tapestry of tradition. It has always been to one of the most exciting events that take place every four years. Accompanied with Presidential Debates, precedes Presidential Candidate. We all know that there has to be at least two Presidential Candidates in order for Presidential Debates to exist.

It seems that the founding fathers were a lot smarter than we give them credit for in 1792. This was the year the College, as we call it today the Electoral College, ratified in the Constitution of the United States of America by the colonies. This would also start the longest continuous debate our nation has ever experienced over a single political issue that continues even today. This debate came center stage during the election of 1800 when Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr (Jefferson’s Vice President running mate)received the same number of electoral votes for President even though they were running mates (http://www.ushistory.org/us/20a.asp). This tie would lead to changes to the Electoral College of their day and the foundation for the 12th Amendment to our Constitution.

It’s evident that this has been one of the most divided and controversial presidential elections starting from the primaries all the way to the first and second presidential debates. Whether we agree with the candidate’s political views and methods of approaching the American people, and regardless of our personal opinion on the matter, it seems like both candidates have created an interest on this particular political event in the American people, this is best described in the iconic words of Isoroku Yamamotto “They have awakened a sleeping giant”. Whether it is for their popularity and controversy in the media, as it has been shown in the recent debates, they have helped shine a spotlight on the political process and with it, they’ve brought to the light an interesting group of voters, they’ve continued and some cases started a conversation on social and foreign issues, but more interestingly, in some way, they’ve shown how the American people thinks.

The Great Debaters is a 2007 American biographical drama film directed by and starring Denzel Washington. Written by Robert Eisele, based on a story by Mr. Eisele and Jeffrey Porro. The story is spin around the efforts of the debate coach Melvin B Tolson at wiley college who coached the college debate team. The team was including merely of African-American students at a time when racismand Jim Crow laws were still facts of life in the South. "The Great Debaters" is about a longs hot debate team that wins a national championship. The film is the journey of the coach MelvinTolson. He is brilliant teacher..He’s organizing both poor whites and blacks, whose serfdom is equal. He conducts auditions and selects four members and he coach them and leads

Making a decision is a very important part of life that every person, at one time or another, has to make. Options are always available when someone has to make a decision. In choosing a President for our country, we have to look at our candidates and decide which ones beliefs can help the country the most. We get to hear the President's opinions through the debates. This year, although we had numerous candidates, the only two that were allowed to participate in the debates was Vice President Al Gore and Texas Governor George Bush.