The Revolutionary War Of Massachusetts Veterans

Supporting what historians argued, weaknesses of the Articles of Confederations were displayed in Shays Rebellion, which was led by farmers’ who protested on increased taxes, calling for a stronger government. Majority of the power from government was divided amongst states, whereas the central government received little to none since it only consisted of its legislature. With given support, it can be stated that the Rebellion tested the Articles of Confederation's weaknesses in financial, and domestic problems which called for the Constitutional Convention to develop a stronger central government.

However, an uprising led by Revolutionary War captain Daniel Shays that took place in western Massachusetts in 1786 was the event that got the attention of the founding fathers. The Shay’s Rebellion demonstrated to the founding fathers that the Articles of Confederation brought commercial problems, threaten civil order, and conflicts between states. Likewise, at the constitutional convention the founding fathers crafted and ratified the U.S constitution to address the problem the Articles of Confederation could not tackle. Unlike the Articles of Confederation, the divided the powers of the national government into three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. Furthermore, the constitution established a one true currency system and presented the job duties and requirements the three branches and individual states. Unlike the Articles of Confederation, the constitution presented the rights of its people (Bill of Rights) and a system of check of balance and separation of powers that the United States as democratic country. The Articles of Confederation was a popular democracy with its chaotic results and the constitution was a responsible democracy with its civilized outcomes.

In 1763, the French and Indian War ended, leaving Great Britain with large debts. In order to help with the debt, Great Britain passed laws to tax the colonists. The colonists were furious. Were the American colonists justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain? Yes, the American colonists were justified in waging war to break away from Britain because the British Parliament was over taxing the colonists, the colonists were forced to stay on the East side of the Appalachian Mountains, and they had to pay to house and care for British soldiers.

After the Shay’s Rebellion, governors felt like the Articles of Confederation needed to be reform and a stronger federal government would be necessary. During the Shay’s Rebellion, farmers tried to stop the judges from going to work and they revolted. The government reacts by sending a state militia,

Shays Rebellion Illustrates the weaknesses of the Articles of confederation under which we now live. The Articles of Confederation can not regulate trade, levy taxes, or unify these 13 colonies. These problems cause

The topic of revolution is extremely subjective. What may appear as an insurrection to some might not be as extreme to others. When talking about the American Revolutionary War, however, the answer is clear. While the War certainly brought about change within the United States, it wasn’t necessarily very revolutionary. The most important aspects of the colonies, such as ideas about government, various types of societal equality, slavery and freed blacks, and the rights of women remained for the most part, unaffected.

8. Shay’s Rebellion- farmers in the central part of Massachusetts with the leader Daniel Shays seized the armory in Springfield, Massachusetts before the state militia put down the rebellion and executed several of the conspirators. Exposed the weakness of the American government under the old “articles of confederation” added urgency to the meeting in Philadelphia to replace articles with constitution. A bunch of farmers put a threat on government. See whiskey Rebellion 1794, the government was stronger with the constitution.

With the creation of the Articles remained the lack of a strong central authority to resolve disputes between the states. To organize the states for the collective good, including the organization of a militia, was crucial to the development of the Constitutional Convention (Hamilton et al., 2008). The aftermath of Shay’s Rebellion reinforced the fears of national leaders about the dangers of ineffective state governments and of popular democracy out of control. In the climate of economic turmoil and repressions, the Philadelphian convention was conned to prescribe solutions to the Articles of Confederation. Although the initial thought was instructing delegates to propose revisions for the Articles of Confederation, instead, they wrote an entirely new constitution instead (Hamilton et al., 2008)

The Articles of Confederation was a loose “league of friendship” between the thirteen colonies that would create a confederation in contrast to Great Britain 's unitary system. While the Articles of Confederation helped establish a systemic role in trying to unify many of the states under a weak central government, it later created many more problems than solutions. One of them being that Congress had no ability to propose taxes to deal with war debts and running the government. Another weakness was that Congress did not have the ability to regulate commerce among states and foreign nations which hurt Congress’s credibility. One of the most considerable weaknesses of Congress under the Articles of Confederation was its failure to provide for a strong central government. The Articles of Confederation was created to not compare with the totalitarian regime of the British and made sure of not creating a strong central government. The problem was that without a strong central government it eliminated all sovereignty that the central government had, giving increased sovereignty to states which lead to increased chaos. It is seen that Shays Rebellion was that nail in the coffin of The Articles. Lead by David Shay a group of farmers who had served in the Continental Army marched to Springfield, Massachusetts to stop the state court from foreclosing on the veterans farms. Congress’s failure in being able to formulate a militia and stop the disgruntled farmers was the end of The

Thomas Jefferson believed the Shay’s Rebellion was a very significant event. In the year 1787, he wrote a letter, conveying his idea of rebellions. “Yet where does this anarchy exist?” a line written in Jefferson’s letter. This tells us his idea of Shay’s rebellion. From this one line we can conclude that he does not believe there is a real chaos going on. “God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion.” What he means by this is that rebellions sometimes do need to happen. It makes up what helps us learn and improve. “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” When he says this he means that sacrifices have to be made in order for us to

Daniel Shays’ rebellion consisted of the angry farmers who were being over taxed to the point of homelessness they had marched on to the continental stores to show their mistreatment (shaysrebellion.stcc.edu). The main point to the march was to oppose the taxing of the farmers’ needs so heavily. The farmers had been subjected to high taxes and, when they failed to pay, lawsuits were given to them (shaysrebellion.stcc). After having to endure the unfair treatment the farmers decided to attempt to make the government see their faults and change the balance of power over to the central government instead of the states. After Shays’ Rebellion, Washington wrote to Madison describing the current state of the nation and the chaos unfolding (Washington). Washington saw the disorderly conduct The Articles of Confederation have caused. The economy had suffered as well as the people and he sought a way to improve the unity of the nation. Not only did the lack of strength in the government become a reason to abolish The Articles of Confederation, but the lack of funds also had a

In 1776, the American people declared themselves an independent nation. The American people were traumatized by the Revolution and feared a strong central government. This led to their first attempt at a government, the Articles of Confederation, which ultimately failed. After this let down of a government, the founding fathers wrote the Declaration of Independence, which would become the law of the American land. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were two influential individuals, who were originally involved in the writing of the Declaration of Independence. Both were involved in the political side of the Revolutionary war, but when speaking of it, told alternate versions of the war. As they approached the end of their lives, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams dedicated themselves to telling extremely differentiating versions of the Revolutionary War; Jefferson focusing on the glory and Adams focusing on the hardships, while Jefferson’s version is the only one recorded in the textbooks students use today.

I believe that Shay’s actions were absolutely necessary because we fought against Britain who was doing the exact same thing as congress. They needed funds after the french and indian war just like we did, and they taxed us to cover the costs just like we tried not to do, but ultimately failed. As it states on pg. 195 of the textbook, “After the revolutionary war, the United States experienced a depression, a period when economic activity slows and unemployment increases,” meaning that the newborn nation has a new demand for resources, money, cooperation, and agreement. However I do believe that, while necessary, was a little overboard. I do believe that what he did was needed but to do it in such a manner that you almost start a revolutionary

A motivating force behind the revolution was the American embrace of a political ideology called "republicanism", which was dominant in the colonies by 1775. The "country party" in Britain, whose critique of British government emphasized that corruption was to be feared, influenced American politicians. The commitment of most Americans to republican values and to their rights, helped bring about the American Revolution, as Britain was increasingly seen as hopelessly corrupt and hostile to American interests; it seemed to threaten to the established liberties that Americans enjoyed. The greatest threat to liberty was depicted as corruption. The colonists associated it with luxury and, especially, inherited aristocracy, which they condemned.

The nation fell into a recession after the Revolutionary War and the disastrous financial situation allowed by the Articles only made matters worse. The problems with the Articles became undeniable in 1786 when Daniel Shay, a Massachusetts farmer and retired captain in the Continental Army, led his fellow farmers in resistance against farm foreclosures. He led armed bands of these men against the courts of western Massachusetts in an effort to force a closure of the court system (Text, 110). The rebellion was defeated by January of the following year but it was clear that change was needed.