preview

The Rhetoric of LBJ: Speech Addressing Discrimination and Voting Right Legislation

Good Essays

Over Come we Shall On March 15, 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson addressed a session of Congress to urge the passage of new voting rights legislation. President Johnson’s speech was in response to the unjustly attack of African Americans preparing to march in Montgomery. In his address Johnson confronted the problem of racism and racial discrimination. He declared that “every American citizen must have an equal right to vote. In order for Johnson to handle the American crisis and simultaneously settle into his new position as chief executive, his rhetorical debut as president would have to be one that offered Americans the confidence to believe he was not simply a political …show more content…

One notices a comparison between Johnson and King. Johnson, like King, also based his speech in the light of principal. For an example, Johnson states, “The Constitution says that no person shall be kept from voting because of his race or his color. We have all sworn an oath before God to support and to defend that Constitution. We must now act in obedience to that oath.” Johnson unspoken claim is, he is a man of his word and if one is an American then one should hold true to the word of the Constitution. Johnson’s narrative of the American Promise was mainly a story of the nation's commitment to freedom and equality. The speech began by identifying these two ideas in a conventional way. He discussed freedom in terms of political liberties, and equality is discussed in terms of equal rights or equal opportunity. The struggle for civil rights, he suggested, was about guaranteeing those principles. Johnson emphasized the exercise of freedom and equality, which he claimed “takes much more than just legal right”. Rather than only guaranteeing equal rights and opportunities, he suggested that to “make good on the promise of America” also meant giving all citizens “the help that they need to walk through those gates. He invited citizens to think not only about political rights but also about the circumstances under which freedom and equality flourish. Whereas freedom

Get Access