The Rhetorical Analysis Of Cear Chavez

By using strong pathos, Chavez is able to evoke emotion and illustrate the harm that comes from violent actions. In his passage, the author uses pathos to evoke emotion in order to deter violent actions. Chavez says, “Our conviction is that human life is a very

By using powerful, evocative phrases in his writing, Chavez adds polish to the article. For instance, he says that he is “not blind to the feelings of frustration, impatience and anger” (Chavez 47-48). This potent metaphor adds liveliness to his writing, eliciting the same feeling as a rousing speech. Additionally, Chavez concocts a catchy saying that rings true for many people: “The rich may have money, but the poor have time.” (92-93). His use of metaphors and idioms transforms his article from simply functional to a powerful addition to the argument against nonviolence.

Multiple times, throughout the text, Chavez uses pathos to appeal emotionally to his audience. Chavez builds a connection and empathy with the readers and persuades them to be people who fight for causes nonviolently. In the sixth paragraph Chaves states that, “men and women who are truly concerned about people are non violent by nature. These people become violent when the deep concern they have for people is frustrated and when they are faced with seemingly insurmountable odds.” Chavez states that everyone who actually cares about people should be nonviolent, that they shouldn’t have to resort to violence because they don’t need it. This quote builds a connection and causes self-reflection for the

In enjoying, as well as closely examining, an article written by Cesar Chavez on the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., which was published in a magazine of a religious organization devoted to helping those in need, it becomes evident that Chavez, through the use of many rhetorical devices and literary tools, feels very strongly on the thought of nonviolence being superior to violence. According to the labor leader and civil rights activist, nonviolence will always conquer violence, which Chavez makes clear through the use of rhetorical tricks such as allusions, specific word choice and sentence structure, strategic tone and by appealing to the values of his audience.

Chavez uses rhetorical choices such as pathos in his speech to obtain sympathy from his audience. He wants people to understand that supporting violence will lead to the deaths of innocent lives. Chavez uses words like “injury” and “death” to evoke the readers while he explains how violence can end a life. These words are strong terms which provokes the audience’s emotions. For example, “violence will escalate… many injuries and deaths…” (Chavez). Chavez wants the readers to know that violence isn’t the only solution to problems because eventually

Many of us today know about Martin Luther King Jr. “I have a Dream” speech; yet, Cesar Chavez gave a similar speech about a different crisis and we fail to recognize it. Martin Luther King, Jr. became a leader in the Civil Rights Movement to end racial segregation and discrimination in America during the 1950's and 1960's. He hoped to obtain equality through nonviolent actions. Cesar Chavez was the leader of the United Farm Workers of America, who saw the hopes for better lives for Mexican, Mexican American, and Hispanic workers in the United States. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Cesar wrote about two very different topics they tend to have many similarities throughout their speeches discussing what we as a nation need to do to solve each problem.

César Chavez once said, “Nonviolence is not inaction. It is not discussion. It is not for the timid or weak. Non-violence is hard work. It is the willingness to sacrifice It is the patience to win.”. His words inspired one young man to turn his life around and become a man of character who used his experiences to help others. In his essay “César Chávez Saved My Life” Daniel “Nene” Alejandrez tells his story of the struggle and anger towards many injustices that happen around him and his journey from channeling that anger through crime to using it to start a foundation Barrios Unidos, to help men in prison overcome poverty, and the drug and violence culture surrounding them. In his essay, Alejandrez uses key scenes from his life to convey his main theme of spiritual connection to overcome the many hardships the Latino community faces in this country.

In paragraph five and six he describes what effect nonviolence can have on people to how it can change. Chavez uses pathos to show how the poor are struggling. Chavez uses detail to consider who the people are and what they’re feeling. The speaker observes that, “a direct appeal from the poor struggling nonviolently against great odds, they will react positively.” He uses detail on describing people; giving examples and explaining emotions by making connections. The speaker argues that, “If we resort to violence then one of two things will happen: either the violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers.” This analyzes imagery used to appeal to emotions, and determine the consequences of

“We advocate militant nonviolence as our means of achieving justice for our people, but we are not blind to the feelings of frustration, impatience and anger which seethe inside every farm worker.” First Chavez uses emotionally charged language, such as militant, that carries strong emotional weight. Secondly this quote uses the emotional character of a widely revered back bone of the United States, the farmer. Finally using emotional words such as frustration, impatience, and anger makes the literal connection in the reader's mind to the emotional distress people go through. It is not only through emotion that Chavez strengthens his appeal, however, as he also employs clear and direct logic in his

Chavez’s main rhetorical strategy was pathos. Pathos led to how the story impacted the reader’s beliefs; pathos is used to affect the feeling of the reader. It is effective because it allows the reader to connect with what is being said. Chavez uses the pathos argument to show American’s feelings, “the American people and people

Pathos is a quality that evokes pity or sadness on an actual life experience or literature. Chavez uses pathos in order to appeal to the audience’s emotions, values, assumption and sense of identity. It is an expression of hatred and darkness in the world of literature. For example, Chavez applies this concept of Pathos to the audience when he states, “The fast was meant as a call to sacrifice for justice and as a reminder of how much suffering there is among farm workers.” This assertion appealed to intended audience because it symbolize moral and spiritual uniqueness. Chavez was a devoted catholic who took priority in helping humanity. He wanted the audience to learn about their human rights and worked diligently to humanize them from

Today I am going to talk when I moved from Venezuela to the United States.

Every leader's goal is to better something. In Barack Obama's case, and Cesar Chavez’s case they both want to better our union from different aspects. In the “Remarks of Senator Barack Obama: ‘A More Perfect Union’”, and “What the Future Holds for Farmworkers and Hispanics” the authors make a claim that they want to better the union. Obama wants the whole Union to better Itself by working together, whereas Chavez hopes that with bettering the union comes with better treatment of Hispanics and Farm Workers. Both use ethos, logos, and pathos to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of their argument.

In the height of the civil rights movement violence was typically the route taken to solve what most would call problems.Though throughout the piece written by civil rights leader Cesar Chavez, there is a clear message that the only way to have a significant amount of change is through the act of nonviolence. With the use of powerful diction, appeal towards the underlying faith of his readers, and a contrasting argument against his belief, it all comes down to the fact that the people will come to definite conclusion that they have no doubt as to what the proper way to handle the situation is.

Dr.Martin Luther King was a huge advocate for nonviolent protesting during the civil rights movement. In his letter written in the first person, he explained and defended his well-known policy of nonviolent protesting and resistance.He also gave his four basic steps for a nonviolent campaign stating” collection of the facts to determine whether injustices are