The Right For Individual Legal Age Essay

The legal drinking age in the United States will always be a point of contention. No one can settle upon a drinking age that everyone is in agreement with; should it be 18 or 21? Ages 18 and 21 are the most popular options, yet neither one has 100% of the vote. With the current legal drinking age in America standing at 21, meaning that people under the age of 21 cannot purchase or consume alcoholic food or beverages, there is the question of whether or not to lower it to 18 or 19 years old. This paper will argue that the drinking age should be lowered, and examine its impact on State University.

Many freedom of speech and expression issues that receive media attention have to do with the adult population and what they feel their rights are. What many fail to recognize is the fact that the youth today are also dealing with freedom of speech and expression issues in their own lives. The freedom of speech and expression issues that young people deal with are just as important and are handled in the same manner as any other freedom of speech issue. Three articles from The Associated Press deal with freedom of speech and expression of middle and high school aged young people. These articles shed light on what types of First Amendment issues the youth today are dealing with.

In order to understand these sub-cultures, one must first comprehend Elazar’s political culture typology. In the 1960s, Elazar reasoned that the United States’ values and attitudes could be identified through three political cultures which were formed based on the ideals of immigrant ancestors and also through migration patterns throughout the country. These three cultures—moralistic, individualistic and traditionalistic—align with the three primary political parties in the United States—democratic, independent and republican. He also found that when divided into thirds—north, central, and south—the country would classify itself, the north being moralistic, central being individualistic and south being traditionalistic based on the similar values and outlooks of the people that settled in these areas.

This was the party slogan for the political culture in George Orwell’s novel, 1984; a stark, depressing world where “Big Brother” is watching you at all times. The political culture of the Untied States, thankfully, is a much more democratic and freeing environment. “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness...” is what we live by, not “Freedom is slavery.” The political culture of the United States is made up of two main concepts: liberty and equality. These will be discussed in this paper.

Political culture is an individual's' shared structure of qualities, convictions, and propensities for conduct identified with government and legislative issues. These goals and examples of conduct create after some time and influence the political existence of a state, local or nation. Political culture is essential since it sets up the scenery against which legislative issues develop. It sets up the external furthest reaches of what is conceivable, or plausible in the political domain.

Drinking alcohol otherwise known as ethanol is a legal drug manufactured in different percentages and various drinking beverages. Ethanol is a naturally occurring colorless liquid produced by fermentation which is an anaerobic chemical process which yeast decomposes sugars and is converted into alcohol and carbon dioxide without the presence of oxygen. Normal alcohol percentages range from about 2% up to 60% and while some other beverages can range higher. In the U.S. there has been recent studies to deny the proposal to lower the alcohol consumption laws from 21 to 18. The drinking laws in the United States include The National Minimum Drinking Age Law which was passed on July 17, 1984 by the United States Congress to structure and control the consumption of alcohol. The National Minimum Drinking Age Law prohibits any age limit under 21 to

In the United States, a citizen is considered an “adult” at the age of 18, and with that new title comes many responsibilities, such as the right to vote and to join the army. However, the legal drinking age in America is twenty-one. This issue has been a major controversy for some time now that faces both national and state governments. Should the drinking age be lowered to the age when legally a person becomes an adult and assumes all other adult responsibilities, or should it remain at a higher age to allow people to grow more mature and, hopefully, make more responsible decisions?

According to Caldwell (1961) the juvenile justice system is based on the principle that youth are developmentally and fundamentally different from adults. According to Mack (1909) the focus of the juvenile justice system has shifted from “was the crime committed” to “why did the child commit the crime”, “how can we help the child”. When performing as it is designed and up to the initial intentions, the juvenile court balances rehabilitation (treatment) of the offender with suitable sanctions when necessary such as incarceration. According to Griffin (2008) in some cases juveniles may be required to be “transferred” to adult court. In this paper I am going to discuss the three primary mechanisms of waiver to adult court: judicial waiver

There are many people who receive life in prison without parole sentences for committing crimes like homicide. Some of the people that receive these sentences are juveniles. Many people argue that juveniles should not be sentenced as an adult because their brain is not fully developed while others argue they should. Juveniles should be able to receive the “life in prison without parole” sentence because although their age is different than adults, their crime is not.

Either to try individuals as adults or juveniles has evoked profound strife. I strongly believe that all individuals over the age 15 should be tried as an adult no matter the crime. According to the Justice Department, serious illegal offenses such as rape, assault, robbery with violence, and drug negotiation have increased among juveniles to 30% with 10% of all homicides by juveniles. To begin with, juveniles have the ability to plan a kill. As well as acknowledging that a crime by a juvenile is no different than a crime by an adult.

Life sentences are given to criminals who are utterly aware of their actions. Juveniles who commit murder or any other crime are not fully conscious of the actions they have committed. The abolishment of life in prison for juveniles who commit murder should be considered. Adult criminals are sentenced to life in prison because they’re completely developed and self aware of their actions. Juveniles have not fully reached their peek of self awareness which makes them prone to impulsive decisions. Many of these juveniles who are placed in detention centers due to crime have mental disorders, brain development issues, and broken families. Juveniles should not be sentenced to life

Just imagine if your child was charged as an adult and sent to prison or jail for 40 years over accidently giving a friend a small paper cut. How would you feel? Wouldn’t you want justice in your child’s safe? Well...

As more minors commit murders, courts must decide their punishments. There are two sides divided on punishments for juveniles. One side wants children to be never be tried as as adults (no matter the crime). The otherside wants to allow for courts to charge children as adults; with a reasonable excuse to (like murder). Kids who intentionally commit murder, rape, or other major offenses must be tried as an adult and be charged with life without the possibility of parole. It is only fair for the safety and peace of our citizens, to try child offenders who committed a serious crime as adults.

The laws concerning the minimum drinking age in this country sometimes seem ridiculous and unnecessary. In this paper, I will discuss why certain laws are unfair and I will provide alternatives to certain problems concerning underage drinking and binge drinking.

Though once assumed to be simply miniature adults, children, any persons under the age of 16, no longer have full legal capacity. The limitations on legal capacity, however, serve to protect them from acting on less than adequate knowledge rather than to restrict them; therefore, children have sufficient legal capacity that any persons under 16 might ever need.