The Right for Self Determination for South Sudan 2011 Essay

According to the conflict theory of dependency, Sudan was taken advantage of, then eventually left on its own. One

China has been working on the Sudanese Government and other parties through exchanging visits, sending a special envoy, making phone conversation, and conducting coordination in various places including the UN. Under China’s presidency, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1769, paving the way for an AU-UN hybrid peacekeeping force entering Darfur. The Chinese Government has also sent a special envoy to Sudan and continued with its efforts. Besides, China is the first country to commit to and take part in the peace-keeping mission in the Darfur region. At present, the advance team of 140 military engineers has entered the Darfur region and the rest is to phase in shortly. China appreciates and supports the efforts made by the AU , UN envoys on Darfur, and will donate fifty thousand dollars to the UN Trust Fund, which finances the envoys’ mediating work. China traded weapons to South Sudan in order to receive the precious oil. China is respecting their policy which is non-interference in their country which results them in not prevent/ resolving the crisis in South

The Genocide in Sudan has gone through a serious phase, some of which overlaps, and continues to destroy the civilians identified with the Fur, Zaghawa, Mass alit and other “African’ tribes living in the Western Region. In researching, articles indicate Human Rights have described the traditional livelihoods of black Africans in Darfur as a huge crop. Most of these black African tribal populations grow their crop by farming millet and other grains, fruits, gum trees, raising herds of castle, camels, horses, donkeys, and other smaller animals. Unfortunately, the majority of Sudanese, African and Darfurians claim their living from the land they have to inherit over the generations, which they have to cultivate. The Africans that control the village has to report to the tribal leaders and the regional Sheikhs. Settling a dispute, land tights and the claims carried out through the people. This has to be oral arrangements and agreements, from a point of view, these people have the right to work the land and trade

In 2006 the Sudan Liberation Movement split into two main groups. Sudan Liberation Movement (Minnawi) - this group is led by Minni Minnawi and signed the Darfur Peace Agreement in May 2006. Minnawi served as the Chairperson of the Transitional Darfur Regional Authority from its formation in 2007 to his dismissal in December 2010. The SLM-Minnawi faction formally withdrew from the peace agreement in February 2011. Sudan Liberation Movement (al-Nur) - this group was formed in 2006 and is led by Abdul Wahid al-Nur. It has rejected the Darfur Peace

The Sudan is home to two civil wars taking place dating back hundreds of years. “The older of the two, pitting the Muslim revels from the south, has claimed 2m lives in the past two decades, and spurred 4m people to abandon their homes.”(Economist 11) Although the two sides in this old war are close to a peace resolution, a new insurgence has begun in the region pitting “Arabs” against the “black Africans”, in an effort to attract peace concessions from the Sudanese government just as the older rebels did years before. An uprising by rebel groups against government targets sparked this new war because they felt neglected by the Sudanese government. But the response of the government to the new revolt falls extremely short of peace concessions, and instead perpetuates an environment of violence, torture and depression. The government has given its own militia, the janjaweed, free reign to pillage, rape and kill black civilians in a futile attempt to squelch the revolt. This can be see as an “ethnic cleansing” in which the government feels that the killings of blacks will hopefully rid the country of the rebels given that the Darfur rebels are mostly black Africans. Thus, the Sudanese

Ever since the start of the civil war (December 2013) in South Sudan, tensions have been running high between two opposing groups. Those who support the President, Salva Kiir, and those who support his fired deputy, Rick Machar. This conflict has caused food shortages and disease for many people. The one thing the parties have in common is the brutal violence especially towards women. According to the article,

Sudan has had internal problems for many years. The country negatively affected itself from within. No outer force caused the issues at hand. Sudan experiences their first civil war in 1956. The issue came from economic, political, and social domination of largely non-Muslim and non-Arab southern Sudanese. The war lasted for about sixteen years and finally concluded in 1972. Unfortunately the violence

If the UN was to interfere with the death of so many people, it would give the rest hope that one day they would not have to live in fear of the killing squads that were sent out to remove every last one of them. China and Russia were there trying to take control of the Sudanese government and give them a stronger foothold in that area. However, the UN was not ok with the Russians and Chinese being there so they sent several hundred troops over there, but the Russian and Chinese troops outnumbered the UN’s troops 100 to 1. The UN pulled its troops back so Russia and China were the two powers fighting for the control of Sudan. In August 2004, The UN sent in over 4,000 troops to try to take control of the capital city but they were met with Russian resistance. In a matters of days, they had taken the capital city and started tending to civilians of Sudan that were injured in all the fighting. In 2006, more than 3.5 million people needed food assistance. The Russians pulled out months later and China soon followed suit. Sudan was soon run by its own government thanks to the UN’s

These people did not have proper roads they didn't have any buildings, they did not have clean water, so be appreciative of what you have. This book was written because it strides towards freedom of war and keeping peace. Sudan has had two wars now, the first civil war in the years 1955 to 1972, and the second Sudanese Civil War went on in the years 1983 to 2005.

The politics are way different over there than here. Executive authority is held by only one person, Omar al-Bashir, who is the president, the prime minister, head of state, head of government, and the commander in chief of the armed forces. Another thing that is different is their flag. It has three horizontal bands with red on top, white in the middle, and black on the bottom. On the left side of the flag, there is a green triangle that points to the right from the top of it. The red band means the struggle for freedom, the white means peace, light, and love, and black represents the people in Sudan. Their government type is a presidential republic. Their

All beginning in the late 1980’s, General Omar Bashir took over Sudan using a military Coup, therefore allowing the National Islamic Front to worsen the problems. Weapons started to flow into Darfur because of these conflicts, and little by little the native farmers started

This Law seriously violated the 1972 peace agreement, forcing the south to adopt Arab culture, language and the religion of Islam. The Nimeiry government was strengthening Sudan’s ties to Egypt and Saudi Arabia, as economic hardships drew it away from the Soviet Union and closer to western nations. During the 1980’s, strikes, riots and shortages of goods and services had devastated the nation. The discovery of natural resources, such as minerals and petroleum that were discovered in the south added to the problem. Although the discovery of natural reserves should have helped Sudan’s economic situation, it became another source of conflict between the north and the south over who would control it.

While still struggling to achieve peace with Sudan since its independence in 2011, South Sudan is now rife with inner-conflict. Rebel forces led by the former Vice-President Riek Machar want to overthrow the South Sudanese government, led by President Salva Kiir.

From 1972 onwards, the government “usually ran Darfur through officials brought in from other parts of Sudan, mainly from Khartoum” (Darfur: Origins). What Britain did basically doomed Non-Arab Darfur to “a future as an underdeveloped colony of Sudan’s Arab-speaking Nile Valley heartland” (Darfur: Origins).

The origin of the war between these two regions goes back to the 1950s when the country, which was previously two separate nations, was made one after World War II by the west. Shortly after this union, Sudan was emancipated from England. 1983 marks the beginning of the violent relations between the North and South Sudan. The initiation of this conflict was brought forth by the Islamic Sudanese of the North, invading with military force the Southern Sudanese Christians . From 1983, it is estimated that at least two million people have been killed in the violent duration of this genocide, most of whom are of the Christian faith and lead non-violent civilian lives. Attention on human trafficking was brought into the international community’s scope with close proximity to the beginning of the violence as two professors from the University of Khartoum shed light on the subject. Ushari Ahmad Mahumud and Suleyman Ali Baldo learned about the genocide and enslavement being practiced on the Dinka people, a tribal group in the southern Sudan, and upon this discovery they dicided to investigate it further. What they found was that raiders from the north were killing the Southern Christian men and kidnapping the women and children to be sold into slavery. The most disturbing part of this discovery was the newfound knowledge that this had been going on for over two years. Professors Mahumud and Baldo