The Rigoberta Menchu Controversy

Her view on the importance of education for girls in her country, but not only on her country. “I speak not for myself but for those without voice.. those who have fought for their rights...their rights to live in peace,their rights to be treated with dignity up their rights, to equality of opportunity, their right to be educated”,she also said this. She rose to fame as a speaker for promoting education for girls that are in the swat valley of Pakistan. She didn’t just stand for her village girls but for everyone who know the importance of education and want to be educated. Because she disobedience the Taliban rule she was able to bring change in her society and make an impact all people around the world by making them aware girls live under taliban rule and the importance of education for women.

In, “Testimony: Death of a Guatemalan Village,” Victor Montejo describes events surrounding the military régimes occurring throughout Guatemala. The book itself is an eyewitness account detailing one instance of violence between the indigenous peoples village's "civil patrol" and the army. This occurrence leads to the execution and imprisonment of many villagers. Even though the book is mainly a testimony by one person, in which he discusses the personal conflicts and struggle between himself and the army, the account is structured around the Guatemalan civil war and the conflict between the government and civilians. The Guatemalan Civil War occurred between the years 1960 to 1996. It was a battle between the government of Guatemala and

In summation, “Despite the mysteries surrounding it, Machu Picchu is recognized as one of the world's great archaeological wonders.” (Source 1) . Machu Picchu is a breathtaking site for the entire family, and is fun and educational, at the same time! I know, crazy. But anyway, surely now Machu Picchu is calling your name, so go have fun, explore and be happy in the beautiful land that is Machu

Binyon states his claim in the title of his article, and throughout the text, he provides evidence to support and strengthen that claim. He makes use of background information to help the reader understand the principles behind the Nobel Peace Prize, and he makes comparisons that give the audience a perspective of the controversy that they might not have had originally. Binyon creates an effective argument that shows the audience how detrimental it is to the award’s reputation because of the unfair circumstances that led to President Obama’s

Elie Wiesel is known to be a deserving recipient of the Noble Peace Prize because as written in Pbs.org, Wiesel “was a witness for truth and justice…not with a message of hate and revenge, but one of brotherhood and atonement” (Egil Aarvik). Almost immediately, Wiesel’s trustworthiness will spark and the audience will feel an immense amount of admiration and trust for him and what he has to say since only a selected, amazing individuals have received the Nobel Peace Prize. The Nobel Peace Prize will serve as a message that the speaker has dedicated an immense amount of time for a greater good and to help others; it is without a doubt prestigious and respected award. Similarly, the reputation of Elie Wiesel and the fact that he advocates for peace and to save suffering victims around the world will make the audience conclude that he has had experience in humanitarian and peace attempts and organizations. As a result, Elie Wiesel’s reputation will without a doubt increase his credibility and authority throughout the text. The audience will be aware of his actions in the past and they will trust and admire Wiesel. The credibility and authority he has built through his reputation and public image will benefit him in regards to persuade his audience to kill indifference and help those who are still to this day suffering. His public image is seen as one of a dedicated individual who is a leader and encourages others to peacefully stop intolerance and indifference and that builds his credibility in the eyes of the

Some people don’t know the great and amazing place called Manchu Picchu, which is an old Inca building that many architects admire. Those people don’t know that thousands of tourists and visitors come to look at it, wonder about its past, and to reflect off of it. In source two, the author states that “A world heritage is a place that is amazing. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization support that Machu Picchu is a world heritage.” This shows the reader how important and stunning Machu Picchu was. In this essay we are going to talk about what was so amazing about Machu Picchu, how it affected the environment and how it inspired architects, and how and who made it.

The general argument made by Michael Binyon in “Comment: Absurd Decision on Obama Makes a Mockery of the Nobel Peace Prize” is that many recipients of the Nobel Peace Prize have not actually achieved peace. More specifically, Binyon argues that Barak Obama should not have been awarded the prize. He writes “rarely has an award had such an obvious political and partisan intent. This is correct because it demonstrates a lack of the integrity that this award was I tended to uphold. More specifically it is believed that this was a way for the Norwegian Nobel Committee to show approval for America’s election of its first black president and in hope that Washington will “honor its promise to re-engage with the world”.

Additionally, her use of ethos allows her to present herself to t audience as a reliable figure by saying, “some people call me the girl who was shot by the Taliban… some people call me a nobel Laureate now.” She convinces the audience of her credibility by reminding them of her personal experience and that she stands as a credible source. Malala says that the award is not only for her, but “ the Nobel Peace Prize money [will be dedicated] to the Malala Fund”, the official organization led by Malala Yousafzai. She builds on personal examples from her life to support the issue, which shows that she has first-hand experience with the problem and that she is dedicated to finding a solution.

Throughout the beginning of her testimonial, Rigoberta Menchu defines her life and circumstances through suffering eyes. Tradition teaches her that life is about pain and hardships that must be endured. Generation after generation has accepted this lot in life, which is inevitable. She feels suffering is her peoples fate. Yet in Chapter XVI a profound movement occurs within her consciousness. She starts questioning the inevitability of suffering, wondering if it is somehow preventable. She also implements her communal outlook on life to encompass other Indian communities besides her own. Her knowledge of the injustice being rained on her people is realized to effect neighboring communities as well. Being suffocated by oppression,

I like many others find the accusations that Menchu lied presumptuous because in my eyes they haven’t proved anything and we don’t know if the so called “evidence” can be relied on as the truth because first of all we all know of the economic hardships that the people of Guatemala face and that the person that said that he was Rigoberta’s brother could have been paid, also we don’t know what the relationship between Rigoberta and her half-sister was like and she could be saying things out of spite due to Rigoberta’s success. I believe that if these things were actually true why these people haven’t come forward in public to discredit Rigoberta Menchu.

Rigoberta Menchu, a Quiche Indian woman native to Guatemala, is a recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for politically reaching out to her country and her people. In her personal testimony tittled “I, Rigoberta Menchu” we can see how she blossomed into the Nobel Prize winner she is today. Following a great deal in her father’s footsteps, Rigoberta’s mobilization work, both within and outside of Guatemala, led to negotiations between the guerillas and the government and reduced the army power within Guatemala. Her work has helped bring light to the strength of individuals and citizen organization in advocacy and policy dialogue on the world scale. In a brief summary of the book I will explore why Rigoberta Menchu is important to

Additionally, She Investigated the World by analyze, integrates, and evaluates sources of evidence to develop a coherent, well supported response to a global question in this case Menchu analyze how she was going to give rights to Indigenous people. Also, she communicates her Ideas by sharing her thoughts about discrimination and oppression on Guatemala. She usually, “Demonstrated her understanding of diverse audiences by communicating and collaborating using verbal and nonverbal behavior, language, and strategies appropriate to specific audiences”.

“I, Rigoberta Menchu” by Menchu is an autobiography that details the genocide of the Mayan people in Guatemala. The book has earned her the Nobel Peace Prize in 1992 for publishing the truth about the trials and tribulations that the indigenous people of Guatemala faced. The problem is that the autobiography has been found to be untrue. The details of the book were fabricated by Menchu, in an attempt to send her message about the indigenous Guatemalan people 's struggles. This has created a controversy amongst Latin American scholars, as well as amongst the education system that requires the autobiography as reading material. The entirety of the situation has even called into question whether or not the content of the book could be taken seriously as material because of this fabrication.

Machu Picchu is a physical symbol of the culture that created it. It is located in the Andes Mountains in Peru, South America, high above the Urubamba River Canyon Cloud Forest. The Incan capital, Cuzco, the closest major city, is forty three miles northwest of this landmark. Machu Picchu is five square miles and eighteen square kilometers in size. This ancient civilization has an altitude of eight thousand feet and is surrounded by towering green mountains. Although covered in dense bush, it had many agricultural terraces that were sufficient enough to feed the population. Due to water from the natural springs as well as the agricultural terraces, it had the ability to be self-contained. Machu Picchu was created by the Inca culture for

On July 12, 2013, 16-year-old Malala Yousafzai, delivered her first public speech, to the United Nations Youth Takeover, where she persuasively articulated her aspiration to reach out to young, adolescent advocates the deficient nature of education, specifically in regards to women and young children. During Yousafzai’s advocacy for children’s right to education, her spoken ambition was to reach a global audience in hopes of bringing awareness to a troublesome issue. Likewise, throughout the speech, Yousafzai effectively expressed her gratitude to the people who have made an influence in her life, including the champions of the world Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, and Muhammad Ali Jinnah as well as the countless teachers she had who motivated her to persist in further educating herself. Nevertheless, she also commendably reveals through her Nobel Peace Prize Speech that the award is not only for herself, but, consequently, for those “disregarded” children who continually yearn for education on a daily basis. This successfully demonstrates that she is not above those children, but, instead, stands with them. In several illustrations, she conveys the notion that she is not going to stand idly by and witness young girls being denied their rightful education. Accordingly, Yousafzai deliberates, it is moral and upright to fight for what one believes in.