As I am right now, I tend to think little about politics unless something big happens to draw my attention to it. I know that this is a bad way of thinking because what happens in politics direct pertains to me. I’ve gotten better in the last year due to checking news every day to see what has been happening in the political world. The sources I tend to use the most for viewing political issues and news are ABC News, Fox, CNN, and The Economists. All of these I believe to give the most accurate information, but also have their own bias views on the subjects that they discuss. A lot of the time, most people and news sites do not agree with my views or opinions, but since all I want to know is the facts of it, I just look passed their opinions
Ignorance due to inability to spot biased is a monumental issue in the U.S. In 1984, people did not have an option on who or what to believe. They were all required to watch a Two Minute Hate so they would dislike what the Party wanted them to dislike. The people could only see what the Party wanted them to see as no other channels they existed. In fact, the telescreens could not be shut off at all. Constant exposure to the Party’s beliefs caused people to be biased towards the government’s views. In this country, people hear, watch, and absorb news every day, but they do not always see or hear the presented bias. For example, Fox News is conservative-leaning and MSNBC is more liberal (Garrett 2&3). People who only watch one news channel without acknowledging or spotting the bias tend to accept what they hear as fact without a second thought. Depending on where information is collected or heard, the person forms opinions based on bias rather than facts without realizing the error in their wapithes and become easy to manipulation occurs.
I would to sit and read CNN or Fox News, and not feel like I’m being lied to or pulled on one side. I would like just the news. The only way I can at least acquire a firm understanding of something is by reading multiple new sources. For example, if I want to know what is going on with social issues, I will first go to Huffington Post. Then I will go and find one of the main primetime news like CBS, ABC, or NBC news to compare to Huffington Post. The last search I will do is for an extreme conservative news site like Fox News. When I done reading all three articles, I generally have a good understanding of the
“Just the facts ma’am,” this simple, yet authoritative phrase is from the 1949 – 2004 (off and on) Radio/Television/Movie franchise named Dragnet. The character Sgt. Joe Friday of the Los Angeles Police Department spoke these words on multiple occasions during interrogations where his subjects were rambling and he needed, objectively, just the facts.
These news outlets, as well as talk radio, at least get people involved in the political world and drive conversations. Many who watch or listen to them have other sources from which to gather information, such as their local newspaper. For every disparaging remark made about my choice of news outlets, I can find 10 more to counter the remark anywhere on the web. For example, Rush Limbaugh said that Bartlett has now gone over to “the dark side.” Another example is from The Christian Science Monitor, “Fox News was among the top four outlets cited as people’s main source of news.” For a 19 year old actively involved and working college student, I do not have the time to find and read scholarly papers because any and all elections would be over by the time I did. In the meantime, I will continue to listen more to the news radio and read news websites while discerning what is actually news and what part is for entertainment
Often times people utilize certain sources and watch certain news channels because these viewers can relate to the views on these sources. It can make one believe that his/her perspective is correct simply because that is what the new source is providing. Viewers watch news sources that share the same opinions as their own, because these viewers are just as bias as the sources; these viewers favor one side, as do the news sources. John Stossel, a Fox News reporter discusses the book “Bias” with author Bernie Goldberg, an ex CBS News reporter. John expected for ABC to read the book and disagree with Bernie on the ABC news channel (Goldberg and Stossel). However, these people were proud of not reading the book and gave it no attention. Even if one does not agree with a certain viewpoint, it is very important to hear the different perspectives because it allows the viewer to see and hear other people’s opinion. Because most news sources do not include all sides, it becomes difficult for an individual to
Technology has forever changed the way we receive our news and has irreversibly changed the landscape of the media. The growth of cable television and the shift from television to the internet have facilitated the growth of both infotainment and narrowcasting. The main question that we’re asking today is how both infotainment and narrowcasting have an impact on politics in America. To better understand this question, we must first know what infotainment and narrowcasting are.
In 1968, Hensley initiated a more comprehensive survey on how national bias may affect the decision-making of the ICJ members. With the data covering ICJ’s decisions on 54 claims in contentious cases between 1946 and 1964, he analyzed a total number of 638 votes. In this research, Hensley found that the votes of regular judges from party states and ad hoc judges deviated from the votes of other Court members by 22% and 44%. While similar deviation are also found in the voting record of the advisory opinion. Hensley argued that national bias not only affects the judges’ decision making in contentious cases but also extended to advisory opinion cases. By highlighting how the voting patterns of the national judges differ from judges from non-party
Women have expressed their political allegiance long before the dawn of modern era. However, the quest for equality has always been undermined by the male dominance throughout the history. Even in the most developed countries like the United States of America, women were not entitled to the same rights and privileges as men. “In Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote. The Supreme Court upheld state court decisions in Missouri, in which a registrar had refused to, register a woman as a lawful voter because the state 's laws allowed only men to vote”.
The news is here to inform the public about current events and issues around the world. However, each news station has its own bias towards certain events. Where some news stations are far left and others are far right, the viewers seem to be affected on both sides either way. Nonetheless, the viewers themselves are not completely innocent in this situation. The viewers will watch specific news stations to have their ideas or biases validated. People usually do not like to be challenged, especially after a hards day of work. This group of people consists of adults above the age of thirty. It would be nice to come home and have something to can agree with. The reasoning behind this, people tend to be more fond of news stations that gives them
The American political system is based on democratic principles that use the voice of the people to decide what policies it will and will not act. Except our government is not a direct democracy instead it is a republic which means that the people vote on representative who they feel best represent their best interest to go and speak on their behalf at the capital. The problem that can arise when you are using this system is that sometimes the people we put in charge go against what the general population wants and these people who were put in charge decided to do what they feel is best course of action instead. The problem that comes out of this is whether or not a society that is based on democratic principles where every citizen should has an equal voice to determine the political direction of their society, and that no one should have special rights or privileges that is not accessible to everyone else in that society. Should we allow “experts”
A news programs bias and political party standings can effect what types of propaganda they show of certain candidates. For example, FOX news is a strictly Republican news channel, it supports Republican candidate, meanwhile news channels such as MSNBC and PBS are extremely democratic programs and support Democratic candidates in elections. News programs political bias can affect the way that particular program portrays a candidate for an upcoming election and a candidate’s portrayal can change a voter’s opinion of a candidate and can cause that candidate to lose viewers’ votes. The broadcasting of malicious rumors and gossip in any form by news programs gives a negative conception to a viewer. No viewer wants to vote for a candidate that is portrayed in a way that makes the viewer believe that they are bad for the country. Every viewer needs to take in to consideration the political bias of a news program before changing his or her opinion of a candidate as well as do some research on the candidates of an election themselves.
In America today, most people have their own political views. Some are legitimate, and some are the cause of one main problem: media bias. Certain media outlets are promoting biased political views on television, the internet, and social media. People that watch and read these biased media sources are constantly believing more and more of the false information that they are presenting. Media bias and fake news in the United States is a major contributing factor to many citizens’ political views, especially as a result of news outlets that promote a liberal agenda.
People automatically assume that a news organization’s bias is strictly a bad thing, while this does seem like a bad thing, the bias is negated by the sheer quantity of news sites that you can easily visit, this may take some additional time, but it doesn’t have to take a long time, while you’re stuck in traffic you can just pull out your smartphone and look at some news sites. If you find that one site has too much of a bias that doesn’t mean that you should just ignore that site completely, instead you should look for the same news story on a different site that has a different perspective, instead of just looking at the media from one point of view, look at both the left and right point of view. This bias allows for a look into how both sides see an argument, while one side may see something as a good thing, another side may see it as a bad thing. This allows you to get into the mind of the news stations and their reporters. While you're watching the news always maintain a level of skepticism about what the news station is saying. Skepticism is key to watching the news in any environment, without any level of skepticism you quickly become a mindless zombies that just believe something because it was said on Fox NEWS or MSNBC. You should take into account all the things said by the different news stations in order to formulate
men salaries. The research has helped me to understand what should I do to let the
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the stages in development of someone that I know. Describing the continuous and discontinuous development that is occurring at various stages of their young and middle child life span. In each section of my paper I plan to include specific subsections on the biosocial, cognitive, and psychosocial development of my chosen subject. This chosen subject will be my eleven year old sister, Faith Elizabeth Lattimore. Faith is currently developing in her early years of middle childhood. Piaget describes middle childhood as the time for concrete operational thought, characterized by new logical abilities about direct experiences and perceptions.(Berger, 2011, p. 319). Faith loves to sing,