preview

The Role Of Crime In The Victorian Era

Decent Essays
Open Document

Queen Victoria ruled England from 1837-1901; Before this era, the majority of criminals were sentenced to death. Briefly into the Victorian Era, Queen Victoria began to punish criminals rather than execute them. The crime rate began to decrease because the criminals were genuinely learning from their mistakes, rather than being immediately assassinated. Criminals became reluctant to reoffend, in fear of punishment. Along with the crime rate, the severity of crimes also went down; crimes were abundantly less brutal. As stated in the Law and Crime in Victorian England, “In addition, crime became less violent. About 90 percent of the cases serious enough to go to trial were crimes against property. Riots, brutal robberies, and murders became uncommon.” (Joyce Salisbury & Andrew Kersten). This statistic exemplifies the impact Queen Victoria had on crime throughout the Victorian Era. Due to Queen Victoria’s rule, criminals were no longer sentenced to death, but able to learn from their mistakes. All in all, Queen Victoria helped to decrease the crime rate by punishing criminals. …show more content…

In the 1840s, “drunken riots at sporting events were common” (Law and Crime in Victorian England, Joyce Salisbury, Andrew Kersten). Eventually the rowdiness subsided and if it were to occur, it was highly frowned upon… most of the time, even news worthy. Towards the 1880’s, crimes was at an all time low, and most crimes committed were surprisingly mild such as, “theft, stealing from shops or street sellers' stands, pickpocketing, and burglary.” (Law and Crime in Victorian England, Joyce Salisbury, Andrew Kersten). The police system was now much stronger, the security was much better, and the cities were much safer. Crime was significantly more scarce and anything that could harm the citizens or cities was completely unacceptable. Therefore, anything from shoplifting to sport game rowdiness ended in severe

Get Access