The Role Of Juvenile Offenders In The United States

Over 1/3 of the 11,000 index crime arrests were juveniles under the age of 16.

There have been many studies conducted that examine ways in which the juvenile justice system responds to female offenders. Historically juvenile female offenders have been treated under status offense jurisdiction (Zahn et al., 2010, p. 10). United States Courts would exercise the principle of “parens patriae” to place the female in detention as a form of punishment for misbehavior (Sherman, 2012, pp. 1589-1590). This principle also remains prevalent as it pertains to how the juvenile justice system currently responds to juvenile female offenders.

The reservation of the Convention on the Rights of a Child (CROC) had played invaluable role in charging the way in which young offenders are dealt with within the Australia Criminal Process. Including the introduction of the theory known as Doli Incapax meaning the age of criminal reasonability, the Young Offender Act 1997 NSW as well new law regarding the rights of a child once they have been arrested. It is evident that these while some of charges are still ineffective in dealing with Young Offenders within the Criminal Justice System the majority of them are in place for the greater good and are assisting young offenders when it relates to the Criminal Justice System.

Did you know, that in the United States alone, Over 200,000 children are charged and imprisoned every year as adults? Early in the 20th century, most states established juvenile courts to rehabilitate and not just punish youthful offenders. The system was designed for children to have a second chance at their lives. “A separate juvenile-justice system, which sought to rehabilitate and not just punish children, was part of a movement by progressives to create a legally defined adolescence through the passage of child-labor and compulsory education laws and the creation of parks and open spaces.”(How to reduce crime Pg 1) Although the view on juveniles committing brutal crimes is nearly inconceivable, it is not a solution to give juveniles adult consequences because the effects of the adult system on juveniles are not effective.

An estimated 250,000 juveniles are tried, sentenced, or incarcerated as adults every year across the United States.With most offenses being non violent, these juveniles go to adult prisons where they are with convicted felons that have committed murder, rape, assault and much more. The youths in adult prison have no form of rehabilitation to better their lives or seek a form for help. With the supreme court ruling that juveniles who commit murder, could not be sentenced to life in prison . Juveniles now can not be tried as adults since they are legally not an adult and would have a second chance to society.

the safety of the community by performing safe and secure facilities which keeps the prisoners and offenders under control. In prison there are wide facilities are available for offenders and prisoners such as medical treatment, educational and vocational programs. These programs are there to help the offenders become better citizens. Corrections are providing the services to each state now for centuries. Every state has its own history of corrections, and every state is responsible for their department’s action and workers behavior. There are so many important rolls, regulation and lessons still need to be learned. Correction is not only for held the people behind the bars; it gives prisoners to reform and rearrange their lives in order.

In addition, near 90,000 Juveniles offenders are held in some type of residential facility in the United States. As with adults, the incarceration of juveniles is often justified as keeping communities safer, but according to Matt DeLisi and colleagues (2011) confinement in juvenile facilities negatively impact on youths’ physical and mental health and increased subsequent offending. As with adult offenders, we must do a better job of deciding whom to send to prison and ensuring that programs are available for them when sent to prison. Targeting intervention within the facilities is essential due to many of our youths having mental health issues and those individuals of criminogenic (substance abuse offender) addicts

The problem with having a not reliable home is that it generates huge numbers of runaways that are easy targets for pimps; such runners engage themselves in sex activities in exchange for food, shelter or even are exploited by known company. In the United States, such victims are citizens, non-citizens, and most of the cases those children are labeled as prostitutes or juvenile delinquents, and the big problem is that they are treated as criminals rather than being identified and treated as trafficking victims. Thus, these victims should be placed on environments where they can receive protective services rather than being treated as criminals and delinquents. I believe that the law should protect those children in an effective way and reinforce

There are serious flaws with the way the US judicial system prosecutes juveniles. Although there is a juvenile court system in place to try youth offenders, the way it is being implemented is different between each state. In addition, some states even go further and try youth offenders, depending on the crime they committed, in an adult criminal court. In recent years, juvenile crimes face harsh punishments in the US, and the number of juvenile offenders sent to youth courts is decreasing, based on the data (“The Sentencing Project – Juvenile Justice,” 2015). This decline of cases being sent to the juvenile courts indicates that more cases of youth crime are being transferred to adult courts. Trying a child as an adult contradicts to UN’s rights of the child as listed on FACT SHEET: A summary of the rights under the Convention on the Rights of the Child (p.1 – 4), which shows that by transferring a child to an adult correction facility, we are denying that child of his/her rights.

As juvenile crime increases over the years due to gang activity, bullying, etc. many offenders are given a life sentence without parole. There isn 't a clear boundary that marks at what age should they be treated as adults because the severity of their action always effects that. Should a 6-year-old be convicted with life in prison or should they let them go? Is a 16-year-old enough to be charged with murder like an adult would be? These are some things that cross people 's mind when it comes to this subject. When the real simple question. Is it correct to give a juvenile offender life in prison?

When it comes to the criminal justice system there is one focus whether it is related to children or adults. That focus consists of a set of officially prescribed rules for the behavior of people within the systems legal control. It is important that structure is established so that we can maintain effective outcomes. When it comes to Juveniles it is very important to try and enforce rules or laws early on so that they can realize the outcomes their mistakes may have on them.

Once they turn into the adult age they begin to commit more serious offenses and end up in prison for longer prison sentence and foster homes are consider as home for them.

One would think that juvenile offenders are different from adult prisoners, but most are not. There are however, some unique issues that juvenile offenders face within the criminal justice system. One issue is juveniles and the death penalty. Some states allow the death penalty for juveniles, but in 2005 the Supreme Court deemed this practice unconstitutional. Significant questions were raised concerning the development of juvenile’s human brain and the maturity level of juveniles and capital punishment. The Supreme Court stated in a five-to-four decision that juveniles younger than 18 at the time of their offense could not be executed. The justices also stated that executing juveniles was a violation of the cruel and unusual clause of the

In the state of Tennessee, the process of having juvenile records expunged can be extensive and time-consuming. The individual must be at least eighteen years of age and have exceeded at least one year from the most recent delinquency adjudication. Additionally, the individual must have never been convicted of a criminal offense as an adult or have never been convicted of an offense following the transfer from Juvenile court. Likewise, the offender must have never been convicted of a sexual offense either as a juvenile or adult and does not possess in his record any adjudication of delinquency for violent sexual offenses (2015 Tennessee Code, Title 37 - Juveniles, n. d.). Further, the offender must have maintained a pattern of conduct which

A 15-year old juvenile delinquent from Minneapolis, Minnesota, finds himself in handcuffs after a fight with a classmate. Witnesses say it wasn’t much of a fight. “It took him (Peter Driscal) by surprise, he didn’t see it coming and when he did, it was too late” says one of the school's student. The fight took place during and after school. Sources say that the offender did what he did because Peter got him in trouble. Also, they fought because the offender thought Peter wasn’t afraid of him. The offender is a very troubled boy. He thinks he can only trust people if they are afraid of him. That is also a reason for the attack. Witnesses say that the offender started fighting him then knocked Peter too the ground and starting bashing his head