The Role Of Nature And Nurture Development At Childhood Stages

The debate between nature versus nurture keeps coming out these years whenever people talk of children’s developmental issues. In the topic of bullying, there are both nature and nurture reasons to make a child acts aggressively. According to Klahr, Klump and Burt (2014), children’s antisocial behaviors are strongly affected by the environmental factors. These factors included negative parenting styles and parent-child relationships. In this way, if a child sees his or her parents act aggressively toward others, so it is predictable that the child is likely to bully his or her peers to some extent.

The classic debated topic of Nature versus Nurture has been and will always be a quarrelsome subject in the scientific world. Meaning, the issue of the level to which environment and heredity sway behavior and development in a person. Nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. This means the behaviors is based on the inherited makeup of an individual and is an influence of the growth and development of that individuals’ all through life. On the other hand nurture is causes of behaviors that are environmental. This Intel’s the influence is from the individual’s parents, siblings, family, friends and all other experiences that individual exposed to during life. However, these concept of ideas supports the inborn genetic framework,

The old and popular debate between ‘nature vs. nurture’ has generated a lot of interest in newborns, who were previously thought to be ‘blank slates’, and has contributed a lot to developmental psychology, a field of psychology focusing on studying infants. It is now generally accepted that both nature and nurture make equal contribution to the infant’s development.

One of the main, and most controversial topics discussed in a child’s development is, nature vs. nurture. Nature pertains to genetic influences that a child has inherited from their parents, such as traits, abilities, and capacities. For instance, what color eyes the child may have, how athletic they may be, and even their brain development. Whereas nurture, refers to the environment the child is raised in and how this shapes their behaviors. Such factors can include, the family’s socio-economic status, schooling, parental discipline, as well as whether the child is provided with enough resources. When it comes to nature or nurture having a stronger influence then the other, the answer is both, nature and nurture, influence the outcome of the child. This idea that both nature and nurture, play a part in how the child will develop, is known as the nature-nurture continuum.

* Nature proponents argue that an evolutionary and genetic foundation produces commonalities in growth and dev.

Are these aspects affected by nature or nurture or both? ”Developmentalists consider everything from genetic codes that lay down the foundations of growth to the countless environmental factors that shape development across the life span” (Berger, 1994, p. 6). Both genetic and environmental factors can shape a child’s development. Early childhood teachers cannot change genes of a child, but they can endeavour to foster learning and development. The first five years of development come on apace and are faster than at any other time. So early childhood teachers need to understand developmental norms and what will affect children. Then children can be given opportunities to experience all their skills to develop comprehensively and pay attention to the things that impact on them.

The nature versus nurture debate is the scientific, cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are caused primarily by nature or nurture. Within the field of psychology, this so-called nature-nurture debate, is very often associated with the issue of intellectual quotient, better known as IQ. In the past psychologists have argued that the way in which a child developed was based solely on nature, genetic or hormone-based behaviors, or nurture, environment and experience. Nevertheless, this extreme way of thinking is now long outdated, and it is clear that both nature and nurture have great effect on our intellectual development. The question now lies in just how much impact each has on an

Nature Vs Nurture centers on how much of a person’s biological, cognitive, personal and social development can be attributed to either the genetic (hereditary) determinism i.e. nature or the environmental determinism i.e. nurture.

In the in Neurons to Neighborhoods text, the authors makes the argument that all developmental studies, including heritability and genetics, can adequately inform society on environmental factors because genetics and the environment work in conjunction with each other, as opposed to separately from one another

Development occurs between many contexts for example the child's genes interacting with the child's home and their family members, pre-school settings and early childhood practitioners, facilities and business' in the community working together to support and educate a child as advocated by the bioecological model (Hayes et al, 2017). Children are highly influenced by people and places that they are introduced to, these influence development both directly for example early childhood practitioners, or indirectly for example the wider community (Hayes et al, 2017).

There once existed a debate amongst the psychology community: whether it was more beneficial for a child to receive ample amounts of attention and care during childhood, or, if benefit was found in allowing the child to naturally discover the surrounding world without cultural influence. Theoretical studies into human development have been conducted in attempt to discover which were more plausible, “Nature” or “Nurture”. It is fully understood that a developing person has genetic predispositions which could alter his/her development. However, I will explore both natural human development, and development through nurture, providing evidence on how both affect such aspects as interpersonal

The debate between nature verse nurture theories focus on whither a person’s development is dependent upon ones genetic blueprint or the

Development includes division as well as growth and the characteristic of gradual changes from an initial constant state to a later highly diverse state. The epigenetic approach, which has been influenced largely by evolutionary theory centres on linking non-obvious environmental experience in influencing development rather than in born programming. Within the epigenetic view, development cannot be simply determined by genes or by the environment, but both genes (nature) and environment (nurture) play a role in the development of the individual’s mental capacity.

The development of human being during the entire course of life, focus on biological and psychological growth (Berk, 2010). Human development hold several outcomes that are altered by both positive and negative influences. Genetic (nature) and environmental (nurture) influences place significant impact on human development. In fact, Pinker (2004) submits that behavior is the result of a complex collaboration among inheritance and environmental factors in human development, ultimately supporting that nature-nurture work collectively (Pinker, 2004).

Human development is a very complex process – from conception to death. There has been a long debate on whether human development is determined by nature or nurture. If their growths were all guided by nature only, they would all be born with a mind of “blank slate”. This means that they do not have any inborn ability to do anything when they are born. On the other hand, if their growth was determined by nurture only, it would mean that they were fully equipped with all the skills they need in their lives when we are born. In other words, all the physical and mental skills they have right now would have been inherited from their parents and the environment they grow up in has no effect. This essay will focus on the effects of both