The Roles Of Bandura's Social Learning Theory

One of the central tenants of Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory, which is also called Social Cognitive Theory, is that “aggression in children is influenced by the reinforcement of family members, the media, and the environment” (Bandura, 1975, pp. 206-208). Evans (1989) suggested that the basis for Bandura’s theories came from work completed by researchers Miller and Dollard (1941) who suggested that human development is actively influenced by “response consequences” (Evans, 1989, p. 4), but regardless of the impetus for Bandura’s work, he is most known for his work regarding aggression in children. This paper will focus on why the principles of Bandura’s Social Learning Theory will benefit leaders in school environments as they

Observational learning and cognitive variables help explain human behavior and can be utilized in a wide variety of areas. The Social Learning Theory (SLT) suggests that individuals learn a considerable amount of their behavior by observation and imitation of others (Powell, Honey, & Symbaluk 2017. It can be used to produce distinct interventions and treatments for those in need. A review of a variety of studies in aggression, stalking, business, and simulations investigate distinct ways to make use of the many components of the SLT. It was concluded that the SLT is diverse, it allows the creation of different treatments that help individuals in numerous areas.

The educator and learner are both vital to the learning process in order to perform new ways that enable them to see the real world as their field of experience

Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory describes the process through which people acquire new info, forms of behavior, or attitudes from others firsthand or vicariously. The likelihood of a behavior presenting itself will rely on the amount of reinforcement it receives and the value that the individual associates to it. While some behavior may be rewarded, others may produce unfavorable responses. An individual will learn from the consequences of these actions and when a similar situation arises, they will alter their behavior according to what was most successful in the past.

Lifelong learning is fostered when the teacher is a mentor and coach who shares an enthusiasm for learning. By demonstrating that fun and creativity are parts of learning, students will be able to find joy in learning. Instead of a behaviorist classroom of skill and drill and motivation based learning, a constructivist classroom is what I plan to implement. With a hands-on approach and self-discovery, constructivism focuses on the journey to discovery and the individual student. One aspect of learning I plan to implement in

Within the Inspiring Education document, the vision for core competencies in 21st century learning requires a “shift away from traditional dissemination of information and re-call of facts” (Alberta Education, 2010) and instead focuses on student centered learning models of inquiry and discovery. This shift in educational practice requires students to acquire new abilities and focus on “higher-order thinking skills, deeper learning outcomes, and complex thinking and communication skills” (Saavedra, 2012) and involves teachers creating appropriate instructional and assessment practices.

My role as a teacher is to assist and offer activities that enhance academic, social and emotional development by using strategies that incorporate all learning styles. Curriculum should be student centered and the student must play a part in their own learning process. To facilitate meeting the educational goals of my students my instructions must be clear and uncomplicated when delivering a lesson. Integrating and accommodating a classroom of students from a variety of backgrounds and proficiency levels can be challenging. Therefore, it will be my responsibility to determine individual learning styles. Furthermore, assessments and observations will provide me the opportunity to choose curriculum and experiences that take into account each student’s instructional needs. In order for students to develop intellectually they need opportunities to discover for themselves and practice in authentic situation that improve their own unique abilities. Presenting young students with unconventional means for acquiring knowledge (e.g. internet access, iPads) and allowing learners a number of ways to demonstrate what they have learned, will motivate them to respect and support their own

The purpose of this speaker's message was simply to challenge us to think about the "how" students will acquire and demonstrate knowledge and consider "why" we choose certain modalities to learn content in our classrooms. The biggest immediate takeaway I have is to make sure that I am empowering my students to take ownership of their learning. What that looks like varies from class to class, but it is an important first step in ensuring my students are active learners and innovative

Wilson (2004) then shows that teaching pedagogy or practice merged with the students’ social needs can and does enhance student learning, because it motivates and engages the student. This, Wilson (2004) validates, stating that all students bring challenges to the learning environment, the solution is for faculty and administrators to anticipate these differences in students and consider Chickering & Gamson's (1987) seven principles along with Wilson's (2004) strategies for enhancing the learning environment.

Akers and Sellers (2013) has stated that social learning theory is an expanded theory of differential association processes and improves it with differential reinforcement and other principles of the behavior theory. They added classical conditioning (the sharpening of involuntary reflex behavior); discriminative stimuli (internal stimuli that lead to signals for behavior); schedules of reinforcement (rewards and punishment ratio following behavioral feedback); and other theories of behavior (Akers & Sellers, 2013).

Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory is a theory that includes development theories in order to understand how children learn. Bandura’s theory is based on how people can learn by observing others, how internal mental states influence people, and how learning something does not change one’s behavior every time. Bandura was able to find out that people learn by three observational models. The first model is the live model which includes observing how someone demonstrates the behavior, the verbal instruction model which learning occurs through auditory directions, and the symbolic model where modeling occurs through media sources such as internet, movies, and books.

I believe that intrinsic factors play an equal role in the outcome of both the interest profiler and work value assessment results. Albert Bandura’s social cognitive theory influenced my idea of this possibility. I learned from him that intrinsic and external factors play an important role in shaping an individual. Bandura identifies that our environment alone does not produce causation, but instead personal factors we experience is what has a significant affect on it (Bandura, 1999). Personal factors are unique to us and are correlated to age, gender, race, and even religious beliefs. The way we act, think, and respond is created by a combination of both intrinsic and external forces. It is these forces that guide our decision-making process that helps create our personality and interest. Bandura refers to the combination of environment, intrinsic, and external factors as multicausality (Bandura, 1999). As I looked more closely at how each individual intrinsic factor affects our personality, I found a study conducted by researchers with Michigan State University that further identified how age specifically influences our personality traits. The researchers found that there is a slight change of personality from emerging adulthood to adulthood. (Hopwood, et al. 2011). Which added to a past study conducted by Erick Erickson. Erickson identified a shift of values through his research on the generativity-versus-stagnation stage. He stated that our career interest will shift

I appropriate 21st century learning and the technological tools that are available for today’s student. Therefore, my philosophy includes a student-centered approach to planning and facilitating a knowledge based course. My mission includes: positive learning, to spark the learner’s enthusiasm and quest for knowledge, and to ensure a strong foundation for lifelong learning.

Based on Bandura’s social learning theory, human development is continuous. This concludes that people are constantly changing, developing, gathering skills, watching and performing. Using Ben as an example, he gradually learned certain things in the ESL classroom. As I previously mentioned, writing was very difficult for him upon arriving to the U.S. Ben first learned how to hold a pencil properly, overserving from others and pictures that we provided to him, then he learned how to write his ABC’s, next he learned how to spell his name, and lastly proceeded to form words and write out short paragraphs independently. This demonstrates a smooth process, which Ben had to perform before attempting to write short papers in class.

In this student-centered philosophy, learning is loosely influenced by the facilitator. As such, independence, exploration and hands-on learning is successfully fostered. The distinction between teachers, trainers and facilitators must be duly noted in order to fully grasp their role in this philosophy. Teachers are typically content driven individuals who impart the knowledge of concepts and theories, whilst trainers are skill driven individuals who train people to develop practical skills and competencies in a particular area. In contrast, facilitators are process driven individuals aiding engagement