The Roman Empire : The Fall Of The Roman Empire

The fall of the Roman Empire was much more complex than fall Gupta India and Han China. There were many internal and external aspects that affected the decline of the Roman Empire, dealing with unrest between the people and unrest from outside sources of invasions as well. Many signs leading up to the fall of Rome began late in the second century. Population decreased and the death rate became higher than the birth rate. The reason populations started to dwindle is due to plagues taking place in the empire, and the diseases and death due to the plagues hurt the population and disrupted the economic situation. Since so many people were dying, there were less labor workers. Due to this the Romans had to hire Germanic soldiers, which negatively affected their civilization economically. The Germanic soldiers had to be paid for their duties, and it

While the fall of the Roman Empire is well known, the exact causes of why it fell can be difficult to pinpoint. Many historians believe that Rome 's downfall was due to poor leadership, weakened economics, or perhaps a combination of the two along with other seemingly unrelated factors. However, there is a string of evidence suggesting that there were three main components that took place to bring about the fall of the Roman Empire. These determinant attributes did not happen all at once, and there was a domino effect with each one directly influencing the others. The fall of Rome occurred after a series of preventable events, including unacceptable emperors, the heavy reliance on slaves, and the increasingly uncontrollable borders of Rome.

A second reason Rome fell was because of the natural disasters such as earthquakes and tsunamis. For example, according to The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman empire, “. . . the Roman world was shaken by a violent and destructive earthquake . . .” (Doc. F)This illustrates that the earthquake that hit Rome destroyed just about all of their culture. This also illustrates that many people died and were injured. This is important because Rome was already falling, so the earthquake hitting made it even easier for the Roman empire to fall. This is also important because many Romans lost their houses so they had to move to find somewhere new to live and support their families, which made their population smaller. With the cities’ populations smaller it made less

At the start of the common era, the Roman Empire had grown to control the Mediterranean world. This made the empire both feared and admired. When Rome reached its height in both wealth and status, it began to experience problems that led to the fall of the Roman empire. To this day, historians still debate how a once great empire fell. There were two major internal and two major external causes for the fall of the Roman Empire.

Rome was once a powerful aristocracy empire that was feared and didn't want to mess with but down the line things went wrong time and time again like the negligence of the army, the constant natural disasters, and the treatment of their citizens, because of this happening Rome eventually fell and was no more.

Rome was, in its more wholesome years, a prosperous city-turned-empire with many brave hearts fighting to expand it. Rome started out as a small and humble town around 750 BC, and, a few years later, took advantage of this weakness and obscureness and put its amount of hard-workers to use. They took over Greece and many others, also creating one of the most powerful and humongous armies to behold the Mediterranean World. Everywhere from Scotland to Egypt to Asia Minor to Spain, there were Romans. Though, why, in 5th century AD, did it fall?

For hundreds of years, the Roman Empire influenced most of the world today by architecture, art, philosophy, engineering, and government. For about 1,000 years, the Empire of Rome was in control of the Mediterranean world. As the empire prospered it was starting to fall apart. Most of the problems occurred from within Rome itself as well as other outside invasions that also led to the fall of the Roman Empire. Most scholars ponder on what exactly led to the decline Rome. The primary reasons for the ¨Fall¨ of Rome were disasters (Doc F), foreign invasions (Doc C/D), and diseases (Doc F).

The great Roman empire started as a small city in around 750 BCE. But Rome quickly grew from a small city to a large empire pouring over its boundaries into foreign lands with foreign people. This empire grew bigger and stronger till I was one of the strongest empires in history. One question many people have is how did an empire so strong, suddenly fall into nothing. The answer is in these primary reasons for the fall of Rome.

The fall of the Roman empire was due to many things. Three of the main reasons were that Rome was so big that the borders couldn’t be protected. Most of the emperor's were assassinated or killed and battle, the currency went downhill which destroyed trade, and many Germanic tribes attacked at around the same time and took over Rome. The end of the Roman Empire is mostly caused by these reasons. Since Rome was so massive the outskirts of the empire was not very well protected which made it easier for attacking cities to just walk on in.

The fall of the Roman Empire is one of the most important and world-shaping events in history, but it provides more than just an interesting study of the past, it also holds many important lessons for Americans and the western world today.

The reason for the fall of the Roman Empire is a controversial topic under much historical debate. How did such a great empire, known for being one of the largest that lasted over a millennium, fall?

Ancient Rome was an empire so dominant, wealthy and economically- stable which came to a dramatic fall in the period of 250AD- 500AD. Ancient Rome faced unexplained unfortunate events which crumbled the Great Empire from the affluent empire to a impoverished society. For centuries historians have timelessly theorised and analysed many debates and research in relation to the Fall of the Roman Empire. What really caused the predominate Roman Empire to fall? Did Rome fall naturally? Was disease, such as malaria a major contributor to the Fall of the Empire, Was man -made infrastructure a problem during Ancient Roman times? Was the fall a natural event? Was the climate changing causing natural disasters? Maybe, perhaps, all the theories interweaved with each other at the same time causing a catastrophic downfall, defeating the Ancient Roman Empire. Edward Gibbon (Gibbon, 1909, pp 173-174.) quoted,

Rome was a great civilization that lasted for years. The civilization was so successful and strong that it had power over most, if not all of it’s surrounding lands. They had powerful soldiers and great armies that successfully fought to protect Rome, and also to invade new lands to conquer for Rome. They adopted many types of belief and cultures from the new lands they conquered. Rome seemed to be unstoppable at this point, but however, there had to be a time where Rome would fall. The fall of Rome was not just some random occurrence, but instead Rome fell due to various problems. Rome declined and eventually fell because it suffered from Political, Economic, and Social problems that it could not fix.

In the later half of the fourth century the Western Roman Empire fell after nearly a five hundred years of dominance and is still widely considered the world’s greatest superpower (Andrews). Many people attribute the crumbling of the empire to multiple different reasons, like corrupt and insane leaders to overspending and inflation. As J.B Bury said once “the fall of the roman empire was a series of contingent events. In this paper we are going to cover the three main reasons. Political and Economical problems plus problems with the military(Wood).

To begin with, one reason why the Roman Empire fell was due to their military weakness. They got weak by when they abandoned parade ground drills. They also got weak and lazy when they thought that their armor started getting heavy, therefore they did not want to wear it. According to Vegetius, the roman historian, they did not wear their armor so they were exposed to wounds, in which they wanted to run and not fight/battle, for the roman empire. Once the military