The Root Cause Of Gun Violence In Bowling For Columbine By Michael Moore

In the 2002 documentary Bowling for Columbine, American political activist and filmmaker Michael Moore sets out to explore the primary causes of the 1999 Columbine Highschool massacre, as well as the roots of gun violence in the United States in his trademark provocative yet satirical manner. Bowling for Columbine takes a deep and often disconcerting investigation into the motives of two Colorado student shooters, responsible for the deaths of over 12 people at Columbine High School on April 20, 1999, and examines other gun-related issues as well. From obtaining free guns at a bank, to reviewing America’s violent history, and interviewing a variety of people, Moore demonstrates that the conventional answers of violent national history and entertainment, as well as poverty are inadequate of causing this violence, for other nations share the same factors without the same levels of carnage. In order to arrive at a possible explanation, Moore takes on a deeper inspection of America’s culture of fear, and violence in a nation with widespread gun ownership. Ultimately, the documentary implies that the high incidence of gun deaths in America is caused by the deadly combination of cultural paranoia and easy accessible firearms that is, to some extent, effectively established through rhetorical techniques of ethos, logos, and pathos.

In the film, Bowling for Columbine, the director Michael Moore takes an extent look at what could have made these teenagers to do such a thing. He doesn’t just look at the terrible event at Columbine High School, but also at the NRA's effects on people, the 2nd amendment, other school shootings, and how the United States compared to other countries gun-control explanations such as Canada. Michael Moore looks as a sociologist would such as C. Wright Mills in which he explores the outside factors of the individuals, but how the personal troubles of the two teenagers involved are related to immense conditions of our society. He doesn’t look at the intellectual make up of each person who creates a crime, but instead looks at how our society as a whole views guns and their uses.

He shows that although the US has many similarities, both have a high level of gun ownership (although he does have a biased spin on this as he interviews a man in a gun shop), we both have a relatively similar amount of immigration and racial diversity, we have a similar amount of poverty. He does this to show that none of this has anything to do with the United States unusually high level of gun violence. He ten points to our media, ours is vastly filled with violence and fear whereas the media in Canada focuses on speed bumps as we saw during the video. The community also said that they were not fearful and would leave their doors open at all hours of the day, this is something that would be unimaginable at least for me and I believe many Americans. I’m not sold on the idea that fear is what causes us to be a more violent society not only in terms of gun violence but in all violence. I believe that there may be other reasons that could explain our high level of gun violence. In the end Michael Moore while some of his evidence was lacking and/or biased did a decent job at trying to convey his

In this essay, I will be discussing the gun violence in America and I will be using different sources to help support my essay. I will be using three sources HBO Documentary “Violence: An American Tradition”, Amanda Marcotte’s “Overcompensation Nation: Toxic Masculinity and Violence.”, and Todd May’s “Is American Nonviolence Possible?”. I believe the gun violence in America comes because of the economic inequality, social status and, cultures. Gun violence is correlated to “toxic masculinity”. In her article, ‘Overcompensation nation’ Amanda Marcotte claims that gun violence in America can be correlated to a kind of over the top masculinity that’s toxic.

Another school shooting goes down and is preyed upon by the media for a gripping new story. Jonesboro, Arkansas, West Paducah, Kentucky, and Littleton, Colorado all have one thing in common. All these places are sites where school shootings have occurred. Why do school shootings happen and who is to blame when they do happen?. These are two questions that are still trying to be answered. Some people say that school shootings are due to the excess marketing of violence in movies, television, video games, and music. "'There is a difference between what one has the right to do and what is socially responsible', he says. It appears that they have targeted a mass audience for this material, and then they're 'horrified' when it's

The fear that something unpredictable can happen at any time has been injected into our society. Whether it be a terrorist attack or a school shooting, it’s practically impossible for anyone to see these incidents occur. Due to these situations, the media and corporations have our society almost paranoid. In Michael Moore’s documentary, Bowling for Columbine, we can see that our society isn’t one that is usually violent or dark, but it’s the fear the drives the American history of Gun issues and shootings.

A possible theme of this novel deals with media. Dave Cullen wrote this book to right all of the

Bowling for Columbine is a documentary about how guns are a bad influence and pollute the mind, rather than supplying safety, which is the real reason behind the possession of a gun being legalised. Michael Moore, the film maker, wrote and produced the film to emphasise his point on why guns should never be sold or purchased again. The main story Moore focused on was one that was absolutely shocking and could astonish you from start to finish: The Shooting at Columbine High School. The ordinary and average school was put through an attack by two absent minded children who destructively killed 1 teacher and 12 students, not including the many more they injured. Moore also tried interviewing people whose lives had been affected due to guns.

Michael Moore's "Bowling for Columbine," a documentary that is both hilarious and sorrowful, is like a two-hour version of that anecdote. We live in a nation of millions of handguns, but that isn't really what bothers Moore. What bothers him is that we so frequently shoot them at one another. Canada has a similar ratio of guns to citizens, but a 10th of the shooting deaths. What makes us kill so many times more fellow citizens than is the case in other developed nations? Moore, the jolly populist rabble-rouser, explains that he's a former sharpshooting instructor and a lifelong member of the National Rifle Association. No doubt this is true, but Moore has moved on from his early fondness for guns. In "Bowling for Columbine," however,

Bowling for Columbine, a film directed by Michael Moore, compares the United States to other nations with gun violence statistics while also analyzing the possible causes for the data. The nations that America is compared to in the film all report significantly lower gun violence rates, even as few as one gun related incident a year, yet the usual causes are still encountered in said nations. Moore states the components believed to cause gun violence are, but not limited to alienated youth, heavy metal music, Marilyn Manson, violent TV and motion pictures, video games, heavily increased number of gun ownership, and the violent history of the United States. Moore claims these elements are also encountered in the other said nations with substantially

Bowling for Columbine is an interactive documentary directed by Michael Moore (Fahrenheit 9/11, Where to Invade Next, Sicko). This film looks into the possible influences on the Columbine High School Massacre, which has brought Moore a lot of international recognition and given him the opportunity to attain an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature. I will be discussing a societal reading of what could have caused the tragedy of Columbine back in 1999, which these ideas were brought up by Moore in this film. The main ideas this documentary explores is fear, racism and the accessibility to weapons in America. One of the first ideas brought up in this film is gun accessibility.

The Techniques of Michael Moore in Bowling For Columbine to Present the Message on Gun Control

When Michael Moore first created the documentary, “Bowling for Columbine”, in 2002 he not only wanted to raise awareness around the tragedy that was the Columbine Massacre, but wanted to look beyond that and dig deep into finding out the political events that led up to this tragic event. Michael Moore wanted to seek to investigate and confront leading, powerful politicians for allowing this violent culture to worsen for their own benefit through creating this documentary. It is clear that Moore loves his country but hates its current politics which is why he decided to make Bowling for Columbine as it both highlights the issues surrounding Americas current Gun laws whilst investigating the truth behind the Columbine Massacre and the political events leading up to this tragedy. This reading will explore Michael Moores political stance whilst investigating the power of the NRA (national rifle association) and the manipulation of the media whilst finding out the political events that led to the Columbine Massacre and changing the way Americans think about their 2nd amendment (“right to bare arms”). It will also talk about Americas violent history.

The high amount of fear of violent victimization among United States citizens (Reid & Conrad, 2004; Fisher & Sloan, 2003; Warr, 1985) is reinforced by the relatively high rates of violent crime (Rand & Costanello, 2006) and misleading media coverage further dramatizing violence rates (Potter & Kappeler, 2006). Lauristen, Rezey and Heimer (2013) point

With violent lyrics in music, video games with violent themes, hyper-violent horror and action movies and more, entertainment media has been under the microscope as a primary factor in causing violent behavior in youths for years. Ever since the Columbine shootings in 1999 and the subsequent blame being placed on the video game DOOM and heavy metal artist Marilyn Manson, the news media delights in finding new violent entertainment to link to youth violence, especially if a massacre is involved.