The Rules of Life: Epictetus’ View
As rational beings, we can become conscious of the law that guides all things. Virtue consists in conscious agreement with the inevitable order of things. According to Epictetus’ The Enchiridion, one acts with the virtues of Stoicism: human imperfection, prudence, temperance, and courage. We can relate what Epictetus is saying to our own lives. It appears that some comfort comes in knowing that one has no control over the predetermined.
Epictetus represents a myriad of concepts. One concept of which being that one should live with the awareness of human imperfection and finitude. He expresses the sentiment that one is able to relinquish the
…show more content…
However, if one does not want to put the labor in, then he should set his sights on something that is attainable with such a frame of mind.
Temperance is a sign of moral excellence. Epictetus says that one ought exude self-control at all times. For, it is inevitable that one will find oneself in the face of adversity, rumor, and conceit on numerous occasions in a life span. Epictetus dispenses his insight into this matter:
Be silent for the most part, or say what you have to in a few words…Divert by your own talk, if you can, the talk of those with you to something appropriate. If you happen to be stranded among strangers, do not talk…If someone reports back to you that so-and-so is saying bad things about you, do not reply to them but answer, ‘Obviously he didn’t know my other bad characteristics, since otherwise he wouldn’t just have mentioned these’…wish to have happen only what does happen, and for the person to win who actually does win, since that way you will not be thwarted. (XXXIII)
Epictetus directs one to see the stability in leading a frugal life. Perhaps one may be lead to believe that Epictetus is contradicting himself in some instances. As it is easy to see that he says, talk with few words, and then continues to mention that one must change an inappropriate subject by diverting your own talk. However, the best way to consider this is to realize that every circumstance is
However, for a disabled slave in the Roman Empire, this attitude was what allowed him to stomach his life, and his options. Nowadays, a person with an injury, theoretically, has options to heal and possibly correct it. Epictetus did not. He also did not live in a society where basic human rights were exercised in the way we expect now. Stoic philosophy, for Epictetus, was a set of guidelines he could use to ‘roll with the punches’. Many other people, when in situations where they have very little control, have turned to Stoic, and specifically, Epictetus’, philosophy. James Stockdale was a prisoner of war in Vietnam. He endured years of torture and brutal conditions and survived because of Epictetus’ Stoic
He interrogates his audience continually and each subsequent confrontation cheapens the last. Epictetus proves his habit, asking, “Is that shameful to you which is not your own act, that of which you are not the cause, that which has come to you by accident, as a headache or fever? [Moreover, this fever, if one is poor, will more than likely kill the individual in this era, thus justifying the rich’s fear of poverty.] If your parents were poor, and left their property to others, and if while they live, they do not help you at all, is this shameful to you” (537)? While true, Epictetus presents a valid argument when he explains that men should not fear what they cannot control. However, fearing the surrounding conditions of what one cannot control serves as the chief stressor for the rich. No hypothetical person that Epictetus describes prefers relegation to his or her social status, and those that are at the bottom, like himself, have nothing to value. Thus, Epictetus’ stoic ideology is born. Moreover, one might argue that the scenarios described in Epictetus’ quote does not quite align with the philosopher’s thesis. Likewise, his audience must consider all aspects that might make the rich frightful of hunger, poverty, and the death to which the lifestyle will
you must speak to them in a calm and sensitive way (one would do so at all other times, but this is currently even more important)
Born of different backgrounds, upbringings, and experiences, Epictetus and Seneca are Roman philosophers who outwardly appear very different. Epictetus spent most of his youth as a slave while Seneca was born into money and became a tutor of Nero. Although these two men seem to be very dissimilar, they each shared a common purpose in studying philosophy and teaching people on how to live well. Each suggested different paths for how to do so. Epictetus suggests in his book, The Discourses and The Enchiridion, that living a life in accordance with nature could be achieved by living moderately. Seneca suggests in his work, Letters from a Stoic, that a happy man is self-sufficient and realizes that happiness depends only on interior perfection. Despite the differences, both Epictetus and Seneca are considered Stoics because of their shared belief in the idea that character is the only guarantee of everlasting, carefree happiness. The world outside ourselves will never give us happiness, nor will it be responsible for our unhappiness. It doesn’t matter what’s happening outside ourselves, Epictetus and Seneca claim that the only thing that matters is how we interpret those events. Further evaluating Seneca’s, Letters from a Stoic and Epictetus’s, The Discourses and The Enchiridion, we will clearly be able to differentiate the two in their ideas and opinions regarding stoicism and the keys to living a well, happy life.
As Epictetus opens his handbook with the line, “Some things are up to us and some are not up to us,” a precedent is set for the entire following of the nature in his teachings (Hackett, 5). We are not merely an individual seeking something better in life, but an individual who can control his/her own path as long as we follow the context of staying true to ourselves and not wandering outside of our own capabilities. “Our bodies are not up to us, nor are our possessions, our reputations, or public offices, or, that is, whatever is not our doing,” is a prime example of what we cannot control, death being one of these (Hackett, 5). Our control is limited to what we can grasp and be in power of, and whatever is out of that reach should not be looked
When he was gifted with his liberty, Epictetus started “teaching principles of personal freedom and tranquility” (Traylor, 2004. P 11). His followers became so numerous that it alarmed the Roman Empire rulers. When the emperor requested that he “shave off his beard to show the public his subservience to the emperor”, he declined (Traylor, 2004. P 12). Subsequently, Epictetus was ordered into exile. In Greece, his place of exile, he opened a small school. According to Traylor, this school taught students “how to live a life of serenity and purpose” (p 12). Traylor wrote, “He was said to be a kind and good-hearted man, passing away around the year 130 A.D” (p. 12).
• Assume the individual is telling the truth. Speak to them in a calm and sensitive way. Listen carefully and make sure you record what was said including date, time and place.
The Epic represents some kind of order in the then chaotic experience of life. Represented in this line of progressive thought, where people are trying to make sense about their momentum in this progressive task of building a society which knew how to perceive itself only by means of myths and symbols.
Odysseus can be described as an epic hero because of his love of homeland. During his time stuck on an island Homer describes Odysseus’ state as, “The sweet lifetime was draining out of him, as he wept for a way home… all the days he would sit upon the rocks, at the seaside, breaking his heart in tears and lamentation and sorrow as weeping tears he looked out over the barren water. (Hom. 152-158)” After 7 years of being stuck on an island Odysseus’ longing to be home overtakes him and he becomes miserable. His love for homeland is so strong he gives up a godess. This shows he would give up anything including his other temptations for his family and home. Another example of when Odysseus shows passion to get home is when he tells his men to not eat the Lotus. He says, “All hands aboard: come, clear the beach and no one taste the Lotus, or you lose your hope of home (Hom.86-88).” Eating the Lotus flower makes people not want to leave the Lotus island. Here, Odysseus states in order to return home, his crew should not eat the Lotus. This is important because he not only wants to return home, he wants his crew to return home.
Thrasymachus' perspective of human nature is that we all seek to maximize power, profit and possessions. He gives the argument that morality is not an objective truth but rather a creation of the stronger (ruling) party to serve its own advantage. Therefore definitions of "just" and "unjust", "right" and "wrong", "moral" and "immoral" are all dependent upon the decree of the ruling party. Thrasymachus argues that acting "morally", in accordance with the ruling party, benefits the ruling party, while acting "immorally", injures the ruling party and benefits oneself.
Born of different stations, languages and creeds, Epictetus and Seneca are Roman philosophers who externally appear to be very different. Epictetus was born to a slave mother, sold as a slave himself and spent the majority of his youth as a slave in Rome. Seneca was born into money; he became tutor to a boy named Nero who later acquired position of Emperor of Rome in 54 A.D. Though these two men seem to be from very different worlds, they have a shared purpose in studying philosophy. The purpose of their writings was to teach people how to live well. Though they had a shared purpose, they suggested its achievement through different means. Epictetus professed an ‘expect the worst so you wont be disappointed when it happens’
Merriam-Webster defines temperance as a moderation in action, thought, or feeling; to have restraint. In the Bible it means being able to master your own desires; to not be puppeteered by your peers, by the world’s offerings, or by your own motives and passions! It is an “internal” restraint. Galatians 5:22 introduces us to the “Fruit of The Spirit” and temperance is one of those fruit. Viewing fruit from the natural sense; we know that fruit is beneficial to the body. Nutritionists have gone as far to categorize fruit and label some as “Super Fruit”. These types of fruit have additional health benefits that not all fruit offer. For example: pineapples are a powerful anti-inflammatory, mangos and raspberries are immune boosters, pomegranates offer more antioxidants than that found in green tea, and strawberries increase brain health and function.
Epictetus was a Stoic philosopher who wrote, The Enchiridion, a manual which instructed people on how to live their life ethically and honorably on a social level. His belief was that regardless of personal conditions, people could live with pride and discipline. Epictetus tells us differentiating between what is in our own power to control and what is not is the key to a noble life (281).
Epicurus lived a life of simplicity, and studied at great length what happiness meant, and announced a set of insights that we only need three things to be happy. These were not of grandeur, riches, or fame, they were simple truths that hid underneath those desires. His beliefs were as follows, that you need your friends around, not just on an every so often basis, regular contact is what counts. Secondly, working for yourself instead of others, getting a sense of helping people out of your work. And lastly that we need to stay calm. We will always be in search of happiness, and the Epicurean lifestyle may be of some insight to us even in the present day.
Temperance is abstaining from the desires of the greatest pleasures. These pleasures can be found in the consumption of food and drinks. They are a result of mainly the sense of touch. While the rest of the senses follow after. For example, the smell of food, it is creating power to the pleasurable operation of items that are interrelated to the sense of touch (McManaman). Temperance, therefore, applies to living a healthy lifestyle. To be healthy you must abstain from the things that are bad for you and have moderations of what is beneficial. When you eat more than the stomach can accommodate, it will stretch extraordinarily large. Therefore, the body’s blood supply will divert to the stomach instead of the rest of the body where it is supposed to be going. The result of this is feeling tired after the large meal