The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)

In this paper, we will be discussing how Sarbanes Oxley has affected the American business and if it has accomplished its goals. The goal of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is to convey confidence in the stock exchange, but it does not defer all immoral activities that take place on the stock exchange. People no matter the law, are responsible for the quality of their work and are accountable for the integrity of themselves and their company. Their own ethical values can take precedence over those set by Sarbanes-Oxley. Not all values are equal in quality, and a person may go above the rules delegated by Sarbanes-Oxley, however, there is another side. Sarbanes-Oxley has created a fear among business practitioners that this new set of standards

In 2002 the telecommunication company, WorldCom committed one of the biggest accounting scandals of all time. They perpetrated over *1 $3.8 billion in fraud, leading to a loss of 30,000 jobs and $180 billion losses for investors . This is one of the several accounting scandals that led to the passing of Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which introduced the most comprehensive set of new business regulations since the 1930’s. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is an act that was passed by United States Congress in 2002. This act safeguarded investors from the likelihood of fraudulent accounting practices of publicly traded organizations by authorizing strict reforms to advance financial disclosures and prevent accounting frauds. With SOX being an extremely important piece of legislature it is necessary to understand the reasons why SOX was passed, how it was passed, what it entails, the aftermath of the act. To understand the events that lead to SOX passing it is imperative to grasp the business regulations that existed and allowed these accounting scandals to occur.

I think that the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) has been feasible in managing tricky financial reporting from major corporations. It has a much lower influence on the misappropriation of benefits. No law or Act have the ability to cover all human predisposition to endeavor relationships with good offense. The law made it harder to quote out of context the association's cash related affairs and made the results more extraordinary (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2013). SOX have increased auditor’s vigilance and tightened management's responsibility for reporting misappropriating assets (Church & Shefchik, 2012). Here are two reasons I trust SOX was successful. First, this Act was powerful enough to cause chief executives to consider money

Fraud is an issue that causes major scandals, although it is a very ancient scheme. Recent fraud events gave light to gaps that facilitated its events. Its extent was drastic by affecting financial markets that eventually trickled into global markets. Major organizations and countries worked cohesively and continue to address the gaps and, in effect, implemented strict compliance regulations to diminish and refrain fraudulent activities. Strict compliance regulations are examples of a fraud response plan the small family business could have implemented to refrain the perpetrators from fraudulent incidents, protect organizational assets and the organization’s going concern.

When revisiting some history where scandals have taken place such as Enron or WorldCom, it became necessary for stronger controls to be put in place and have all people involved held accountable for their actions. It is for this reason that Sarbanes-Oxley Act is in place. It has not stopped fraud from occurring; however, it does create a deterrent. In reading about the Societe Generale fiasco poor IT security is the focal point in this fraud. Stronger security controls will be the only way fraud of this magnitude will not take place again.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act. An act passed by U.S. Congress in 2002 to protect investors and the general public from the possibility of accounting errors and fraudulent practices by corporations. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), named after U.S. Senator Paul Sarbanes and U.S. Representative Michael G. Oxley, which contains eleven sections, mandated strict reforms to improve financial disclosures and prevent accounting fraud. The eleven sections of the bill cover responsibilities of a public corporation’s board of directors, adds criminal penalties for certain misconduct, and also requires the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to create regulations to define how public corporations are to comply with the law. SOX other main purpose is also

Enron was a one-hundred billion dollar company in 2000, until questionable accounting practices, known as mark-to-market, saw their stock prices drop from ninety dollars per share to just pennies (Ferrell, Hirt, & Ferrell, 2015). All of the top employees were charged and convicted of various crimes and sentenced to time in prison. Because of loss of confidence among investors, the government put into place the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). SOX is a set of requirements put into law in an attempt to regulate corporations’ accounting practices, in an attempt to protect stockholders. Sox has proponents, but it also has it’s critics. Some experts claim that it has helped weed out some of the corruption in business accounting. While other

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, frequently known as the SOX. The act was passed on in 2002 as a federal United States law. The law was drafted in response to the numerous numbers of financial scandals performed by high profile corporations such as Johnson & Johnson. The action has created a new company standard of responsibility in order to protect the valued stakeholders, as well as the public, from the deceitful practices of various organizations. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Sarbanes- Oxley Act (SOX) was created following the discovery of unethical and fraudulent activates of companies likes Enron were made public and lead to a major crisis (Fraser & Simkins, 2010). The SOX Act is a code of conduct that public organizations must abide by an was form to ensure that corporations not only make ethically decisions for legal decisions and practices as well. Public organization must abide by the state and federal laws that SOX consists of and their attorneys must report any violations. Organization must create code of conduct policies and ensure employees abide by the policy. Whistleblowers are protected under the SOX Act and any employees that were terminated under unethically and illegally can be reinstated and paid

Retailing is one of the largest industries in the United States and accounts for approximately 10 percent of the gross national product. A retailer is someone who purchases items from a supplier or wholesaler for re-sale at a profit. The retailer earns his or her living by making a profit on the re-sale. Retailers purchase a product, mark up its cost, and advertise it for sale. The mark-up process is the key to the retailers business because if the product is marked up too high, consumers will not buy it. If it is marked too low then the retailer will have lost profits and the supply may be quickly exhausted. Another key to the retail business is knowing what the customer needs or wants and when, how much the customer is willing to pay for the product, what the competition is charging, and where to find the product at the best possible cost to make a profit.

In response to the accounting scandals at Enron and Worldcom that caused huge losses to shareholders and spawned a crisis in investor confidence, the U.S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002. Sarbanes Oxley specifies that publicly traded companies must protect whistleblowers from retaliation, or face large fines and legal actions. SOX protects whistleblowers from adverse employment actions, such as demoting, discharging, suspending, threatening, or harassing. The protection provided by SOX is critical so that individuals are encouraged to report unethical behavior by a company/business rather than being afraid of taking on a huge company.

Has the U.S. Corporate Sentencing Guidelines or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act promoted ethical behavior by employees, or have firms only been interested in avoiding or reducing jail time for their executives?

For this assignment I am going to try to describe the cost and benefits of implementing the Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX) for a company. I will then move on to describe what it is, how to go about it, and what a company may need to properly implement it.

During the decline of Enron and WorldCom ignorance existed and was better professed by Enron CEO Jeffrey skilling who claimed in congressional testimony that, “I’m not an accountant” (2012). Statements such as these lead to the development of The Sarbanese-Oxley Act of 2002. The Enron executives pursued multiple deceitful actions such as fictitious sale along with bogus revenue streams, concealed losses, inflated inventories and manufacture phony profits. Post 2002, The Sarbanese-Oxley Act addressed many of these issues by furthering audition standard that were previously unheard of. Let’s face it as Denny Beresford, former Financial Accounting Standards Board chairman, who was named to the board of directors of WorldCom Inc. Stated that,

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was enacted in July 30, 2002, by Congress to protect shareholders and the general public from fraudulent corporate practices and accounting errors and to maintain auditor independence.   In protecting the shareholders and the general public the SOX Act is intended to improve the transparency of the financial reporting.   Financial reports are to be certified by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) creating increased responsibility and independence with auditing by independent audit firms. In discussing the SOX Act, we will focus on how this act affects the CEOs; CFOs; outside independent audit firms; the advantages and a