The Scopes Trial is a standout amongst the most well-known trials in American history. The trial was a lawful case in 1925 in which a substitute high school teacher, John Scopes, was charged with violating Tennessee 's Butler Act, which made it illegal to teach Darwinism in any state-financed school. This trial was a gathering between various polar opposites, for example, Fundamentalism and Modernism. The clash between fundamentalism and modernism during the Scopes Trial had a significant impact
The 1920’s was an extravagant decade in American history. Many people had bought new items, such as radios, and played the stock market without worrying about the loans they used for the new items and stock market. The 1920’s also brought about change in the United States, such as women’s suffrage and Prohibition. Despite Prohibition making the consumption and possession of alcohol illegal, many people went to speakeasies to drink alcohol. The government could not effectively control the drug and
The twentieth century Scopes trial may have started out as a simple debate between evolutionists and creationists, but quickly escalated to a debate of historic proportions. The 1920s were times of change in the United States, from women getting the right to vote to prohibition to changes in education, such as the Butler Act, which created unease and animosity throughout the country. The Butler Act of 1925 prohibited the teaching of evolution and any other theories that deny the story of the divine
prohibited teachers from teaching about evolution in any state funded school. John Scopes, a teacher in the small town of Dayton, Tennessee, taught a lesson to his students about evolution months after the state passed the Butler Act. Although the Scopes Trial provided a precedent for the clash of traditionalistic and modernistic thinking it created a paradigm shift in the traditional structure of the school and education system. In the early 1920s most students did not attend school. Particularly in the
enacted laws to limit the immigration of those they did not believe were worthy of becoming Americans. Politicians justified this “pseudoscience movement seeking to influence immigration law by invoking eugenic ideas to limit immigration to members of ethnic groups whom eugenicists consider biologically superior” (Eugenics Movement, 2011). The federal Immigration Act of 1924, “established an immigrant quota system based on country of origin. Eugenicists believed that the limitations would rescue the
Wiggins identifies several ways in which the American Society modernized during the interwar period, the time period between World War 1 and World War 2. To be considered modern a country had to become industrialized. "Industrialism is a way of life that encompasses profound economic, social, political, and cultural changes." (Modernization) America made three profound social changes which modernized the nation. The American government tried to improve education throughout the nation, especially focusing
fought to up hold the law of prohibition by keeping immigrants and foreign nations out of the U. S’s affairs. While other groups turned to criminal actions such as violence and murders instead of using their rights to free speech. It changed the education in local schools twisted government officials and further worsened racism and segregation in the country. While prohibition was trying to make a positive impact in
of Health and Human Services (HHA), which is responsible for providing medical and health care services for federally recognized Indian and Alaskan Native American tribes within the United States ranging from community health to primary health care services. The Indian Health Service provides health care and medically needed services to American Indians in health care organizations and medical facilities, which include substance abuse centers, mental health care facilities, hospitals, clinics, and
with a sample population of 277 African Americans and 101 Whites living in Baltimore. The subjects had their knowledge of the Tuskegee study assessed by 6 questions, 5 of which had one factually correct answer. The final question asked participants if they believed a similar study would be possible to conduct in the present day. Mistrust in
be taught in public schools with evolution. “The idea that students should hear both sides of the evolution debate enjoys widespread popular support. An opinion poll from the Pew Forum on Religion in Public Life revealed that nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that creationism, in some form, should be taught alongside evolution”(Warnick, 2009, p. 305).” Creation and Intelligent Design theories should be taught in public schools, with evolution. Teaching about evolution with no clarity of how or