The Second Amendment Protects Citizens

Guns under the control of the government are able to show who is buying the guns and is able to tax the guns. Gun control is the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians. I chose to do the moral issue of gun control because I am for limited gun control. In this paper, I will argue whether gun control is necessary for the United States or does the government have the right to ban guns from the citizens.

The matter of gun control has become an increasingly controversial issue. Whenever, a nationalized tragedy ensues that involves gun violence, the question on what to accomplish regarding America’s gun control takes center stage. While exploring this topic, this essay will attempt to discuss the circumstances that prohibit a person from possessing firearms, also regulations to prevent these persons from possessing firearms. Upon reflecting on the personal side of the gun control debate, stricter gun control begins to infringe upon our rights, as citizens and they should concentrate on enforcing the current laws in the books, instead of making additional laws.

America is the most well armed nation in the world, with American citizens owning about 270 million of the world’s 875 million firearms (Marshall). Indeed, this is more than a quarter of the world’s registered firearms. The reason why Americans own so many guns is because of the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Rauch) This amendment guarantees U.S. citizens the right to have firearms. Since this amendment is relatively vague, it is up for interpretation, and is often used by gun advocates to argue for lenient gun laws. Hence, gun control is a frequently discussed controversial topic in American politics.

Because of many incidents involving handguns, and any other type of gun, the government has been trying to push a gun ban law. As a result of this rumor and possible law, there have been numerous outbursts of support and resistance. Some people believe that banning firearms would be a benefit to our nation’s safety and its population’s safety, while others oppose this proposal and say that guns are not the ones that need to be controlled, people should be the ones that are controlled. During this decision, people from different organizations have expressed their own views and thoughts. Gun control has both positive and negative effects on U.S. citizens.

There is presently much controversy regarding the U.S. and its position concerning gun control. With recent events such as the Newtown, Connecticut (a mass shooting involving 29 persons shot dead) dominating media devices, the public has become agitated concerning gun laws. The fact that these legislations provided an environment where guns can be used by a series of controversial individuals triggered alarm and influenced the masses to lobby with regard to reform. Even though gun control is especially important when considering conditions in the contemporary U.S., it is also significant for the authorities to acknowledge that guns are an active part of society and that people who meet a series of requirements associated with gun ownership need to have access to weapons.

Gun control is the set of laws or policies that regulate the sale, manufacture, transfer, possession, modification, and/or use of firearms by civilians. Are the United States’ current laws for gun control effective? Is the U.S. in need of reform or enactment of new laws? Alarming statistics indicate that the status quo is ineffective. Gun control laws in the US should be stricter and uniform since there are an unusually high quantity of gun-related incidents in the U.S.. Additionally, countries that have more rigorous gun control are shown to have drastically lower gun-related death rates. Through stricter gun control, we may protect the country and its future generations from people who should not be able to obtain firearms.

Gun homicides and mass shootings have taken the spotlight in news headlines around the globe. With such disasters like the Paris theater shooting and Sandy Hook, the push for new and improved gun legislation has become a controversial debate for several governments. The debate revolves around the effectiveness of gun regulations, or gun control. Merriam-Webster defines gun control as the regulation of selling, owning, and use of guns (Gun).

Gun control has a history dating back to 1791, when the Second Amendment of the Constitution was ratified. However, more recently, the debate over gun control has escalated into a much more public issue to which many citizens can relate. After all, stories about incidents involving guns appear frequently today in newspapers and on television or the radio. One could say that the debate started with the passage of the Gun Control Act of 1968, which banned ownership of guns by certain groups of people and regulated the sale of guns. Since then, two main groups have gradually appeared: people who oppose strict federal

Each gun related incident that occurs in the United States is recorded and factors in to the major decision of removing all guns from citizens. It has been estimated that economically, the cost of gun violence is on the border of $100,000 billion per year. In 2002, 71.1% of murders, 42% of robberies, and 19% of aggravated assaults committed in the United States, involved firearms. In 2001, nearly 30,000 Americans died as a direct result of gun fire. (Chemerinsk. 477-485.) These statistics factor into the limits and restrictions given to individuals of this country. Conditions of our right to bear arms should remain free enough for us to be able to protect ourselves from being overthrown by our government, but not without guidelines and regulations for us to follow in order to have those rights in a functional society. (Chemerinsk.

Gun Control has been a controversial topic within the United States for several decades. Many of whom argue against it, stating that laws regarding gun control are unnecessary and not needed. However, gun control laws are unequivocally needed more than ever in today’s society. This paper will examine the topic of gun control and gun violence, thus providing evidence as to why the United States needs to implement stern rigorous laws in order to deter the amount of gun related criminal acts.

Gun control policies regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession and use of firearms. In The United States the issue of gun control has been a hot topic for many years. The second amendment to the constitution "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" means that individuals may own guns, not just police and military however; Democratic lawmakers believe this may not be the way the amendment was intended to be interpreted. One problem with this issue is determining the rights of the people as they were intended by our forefathers. Since 1791 Americans have had the right to keep and bear arms, the misuse and illegal acts of criminals have brought this right under “fire”. In January 2004, three authors reprinted and analyzed

Gun control can be defined as the entire laws that legalize the invention of firearms in a certain state. In other words, it is the regulation of distribution of firearms in a country. For a couple of years, government has struggled to reduce the rate at which firearms are used in a country. This has helped to reduce various crimes that were carried out by people who were said to own guns. Research shows that about 90% of deaths originate from use of firearms. For this reason, it is crucial to eradicate use of firearms by people. Although, they are some benefits of legalizing use of firearms, people have argued that use of guns should not be controlled as it reduces sense of self-defense. This essay will clearly address various advantages and disadvantages of gun control.

Gun control, or firearm regulation, can be defined as the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians. In America and countries across the world, the distribution and legalization of guns and gun related products has created great controversy in contemporary politics. The purpose of the debate being an attempt to find the middle area between constituent safety and rights of civilians to own or protect themselves. Both sides of the debate have their advantages and disadvantages. The question that arises is does gun control legislation actually protect the constituency rather than just take away rights?

The decision on whether to enforce laws restricting the usage has been a prominent political topic in recent times, but do most people truly comprehend what the term gun-control means? When the results of surveys regarding gun-control “depend in part on how you ask the question”, it does not suggest that all the restrictions that the term gun-control encompasses are completely understood (Perez-Pena). As this could be the difference between having the right to own firearms, or having them eradicated from the United States, it is important to not be indecisive. Gun-Control can be defined as a “term that covers any sort of restriction on what kinds of firearms can be sold and bought, who can

Gun control refers to the restricting of an individual from possessing and using a gun by law. In the current world which we live today a lot of aspects which pertains the issue of gun control can be best measured through the process of conducting surveys and coming up with answers which will provide truthful answers to the issue discussed. In most nations across the world, they have formulated a policy which is used to restrict or permit the use of firearms which includes putting some of them as lenient. It is also true those jurisdictions in a given state power to regulate the contact to any given firearms and restricts individuals who are given the authority to have access to guns. In this argumentative paper, I will discuss the impacts of gun control and argue for their control. What the arms has caused over the time and how we need to regulate them from civilians’ for instance in the United States, there are a lot of guns in circulation as citizens are allowed to possess gun which makes them dangerous as they can cause death anytime. Therefore, due to the presence of exposure of civilians to guns ownership many people have lost their lives hence in order to curb this new rule and regulations and the amendment of laws should be put in place to make sure that guns ownership is controlled.