preview

The Secretary Chant, By Marge Piercy

Better Essays

What attitudes does each of the three authors have about the consequences of work? The authors of the three texts all share a similar attitude towards the consequences of work, which is that it can be detrimental to one's physical and mental wellbeing. Author of text One The Secretary Chant, Marge Piercy describes the stressful life of a secretary and how the accumulation of stressful events leads to the secretary feeling mechanical and dehumanised. Piercy implies that, with overwork, people can begin to lose a sense of who they are. In this instance, the Secretary believes she is no longer a human, but instead a part of the office as her voice has been lost in the quantity of work that must be done. Similarly, Steven Poole, who wrote text …show more content…

This is further enhanced by the use of emotive language and a detached and melancholy tone. The use of the verb, "hang," and the noun, "chains," acts as a possible allusion to other historical events of oppression such as slavery. Such vocabulary choices emphasise the way in which the secretary feels trapped and objectified in her own work environment. The secretary feels trapped because of the way that she has been objectified, which suggests that she is only valued for her ability to work like other office equipment, evident in line 1 where she states, "my hips are a desk." The mechanical way that the secretary is employed establishes how she no longer feels as though she is a human. Instead, she is simply part of the office and the repetitive onomatopoeic, "buzz," and, "clicks," that define workplace environments. This is supported by line 21, where the persona states, "file me under W because I wonce was a woman." In a similar way, text 2 considers the damaging effect of work through a satirical narrative voice. This is achieved by exploring how humans are essentially slaves of the digital world. When humans go on holiday; an event that epitomises quite the opposite of work, they are still plagued by, "the fear that catching up on a fortnight's email will be epically disgusting labour." Whilst the prospect of reading one's emails is not the crux of the article, it acts as a humours anecdote that reminds readers of the dangers of letting the digital world control them. The light-hearted narrative voice of the text is emphasised by the use of colloquial terms and inclusive language, such as, "that first volume of Karl Ove Knausgard you've been meaning to read," as it appeals to the demographic of The Guardian and encourages the

Get Access