The Selection and Role of a Jury in a Criminal Trial Essay

A jury is a person who is un-qualified and not paid who is selected at random to participate in the court hearing. To be

I do not believe that the way the jury is selected and the way it operates is the correct way to do it. I believe this due to the fact that not much is known about the people who are selected and that they have no experience in Law. This means that they might not understand the case and they could even be a bit biased.

conversation I had when we were debating whether to try and pick a jury here

If the people of the jury were to

Juries have been utilized in the system of law and order for more than 1000 years. Their original purpose was to provide local insight and information that acted more as a witness rather than final decisions. By the late 15th Century, the jury system had been recognized as an important faction in the legal system and had become independent as it matured from simple witness to decider of fact. Consequently, the jury system became undeniably important following the Revolutionary War. The right to trial by jury was symbolic in the sense that it represented the overthrown power of the king.

Jury duty is lampooned frequently in the popular culture as being a dreadfully boring waste of time and energy that keeps us all away from the more important things in life such as family, work, and getting drunk. Indeed, most of the time, juries see cases that are often dull and certain. Unfortunately, not all cases can be high profile, riveting murder cases that Nancy Grace can shrill on and on about for months on end. Perhaps worst of all, it is something that we are forced to do, and Americans tend to not like being forced to do things. However, there is no better way to grant impartiality to criminal procedures than the jury system. The jury system allows us, the average American, to have our say in the criminal justice process in perhaps the most important role: we can determine whether or not a person is guilty of a crime and we can do so uninhibited by our own personal biases, the biases of judges, and the biases of the federal government.

as to what is the relevant law, and the jury then have to apply the

In a trial by jury, the judge and jury hear the case. The way in which juries are and operate is governed by the Jury Act 1977 (NSW). The adversarial system ensured that just outcomes would be achieved within the jury system through the Jury Amendment Act 2006 (NSW) as this changed the juries verdict from unanimous to majority. Despite there being arguments that suggest majority verdicts compromise the standard of proof ‘beyond reasonable doubt’, in that there is one juror who had doubt, the jury system ultimately achieves just outcomes for all parties involved as to date there have been no reported cases of injustices occurring as a result of it. These beliefs are reflected through the “Independent Juries” (SMH, 2001) as this article said that most jurors are able to understand the duty that they must perform and also that there should be no doubt that the media may influence the juries decision.

Is the Jury somehow being manipulated, or even

juror including race and sex. Part of the reasoning behind the right to a jury

The eighth stage of a criminal trial is the deliberation and verdict (Bohm & Haley 2012). This is where the jury looks over all the evidence presented in the case by the prosecution and the defense and decides of guilt or no guilt and in some cases a hung jury. The way the jury determines this is by a vote of the jurors. Once the verdict is reached they advise the judge and return to the courtroom and the verdict is read aloud. (Bohm & Haley 2012).

A jury has been described as a convention of a sworn body of people with the aim of rendering an impartial verdict. These randomly selected twelve people are American citizens in the tax payers and voters databases. The right to a jury trial is a constitutional right available at the request of the parties, whether civil or criminal cases . The jury is known as the fact finder as it decides on the material issues of the case. After hearing facts from both sides and seeing evidence, the jury is instructed by the judge on applicable laws. The next step is the jury deliberation which leads to the final

The selection of the jury is super important because you need people who aren't going to be biased about a certain situation or the race of the individual on trial so the verdict is fair. The selection of the jury has to be full of people who are honest, un-biased, not an impulsive decider, and not afraid to voice their opinions. I would look for juror's with these

A jury is a body of lay citizens’ unsystematically chosen from the general population to help assist justice and swear to inquire on a matter of fact with the evidence provided to them in court.

In a criminal trial, the state must prove that the defendant committed the crime the Supreme Court has either 10 or 12 juries who job is sentence based on if the defendant is found guilty. In Johnny trial (which is an examination of evidence before a judge, to decide guilt in a case of criminal or civil proceedings) the judge instructs the jury and explain the law. Then witness is called and evidence on Johnny’s case will be presented. Jury found the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.