The Skokie Case

With this portion of response including the metaphor wall of separation, it is this figure of speech that historians have concluded to be the surrounding justification of what is currently utilized throughout the findings of courts and moral explanation of the separation of church and state as we currently know it today. However, even that assumption has been challenged on several levels from Chief Justice’s findings of various Supreme Court cases, including Justice Hugo Black’s restatement in the 1947 Everson decision, to the scholarly reflection of numerous university faculties attempting to prove point for rationale of a lesson delivery at the public university level (Hemmer, 2009; Araujo, 2013).

After reading the article titled, “The Challenge of Policing in a Democratic Society: A Personal Journey Toward Understanding” by Officer Charles H. Ramsey, I was able to relate with his view points and argument. In this article Ramsey, who was a sergeant for the Chicago Police Department discussed the core of ethics. His main example was the Holocaust in Europe during the 1930’s and 1940’s. Ramsey stated police officers worked together with the Nazi soldiers during this time and in return were not protecting their citizens. Similarly, when the police made no intervention to the killings and hangings of blacks in the south of the United States during the Civil War era.

In Alabama, Liles C. Burke has been selected for the government region court in the Northern District of Alabama. As of now, he fills in as a judge on the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals. He is additionally an officer in the Judge Advocate General's (JAG) Corps of the Alabama Army National Guard. In two striking cases, Burke protested overbroad use of weapon laws. In the two cases, he was a nonconformist in the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals. The two cases later went to the Alabama Supreme Court, which toppled the feelings and vindicated Burke's disputes. 2015's Tulley v. City of Jacksonville, Ala., was the primary case. Jason Dean Tulley straightforwardly conveyed a gun into a credit union. He was spotted by an on-holiday officer and

The case study of The Thompson family presented in Chapter 10 of our textbook, “Essentials of Human Behavior” delivers a scenario that many individuals longing to become parents are faced with in life. As the wife of a retired military Staff Sergeant, this case study is a reminder of my experience of my husband’s two deployments to Iraq. The Life course perspective gives an outline of how people’s lives are shaped by different life events that we have abso1utely no control over and the also the challenges associated with managing the stressors of life. In this case study I will analyze the challenges that Will and Felicia Thompson are faced with in their transition of parenthood.

In response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Santa Fe Independent School District V. Doe (SFISD V. Doe) case, Chief Justice Rehnquist commented, “It [the ruling] bristles with hostility to all things religious in public life” (“United”). Separating religion and state has always been a matter of concern for the United States, as shown by the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment of our constitution. Although there have been many cases revolving around the relationship between the church and the state, SFISD V. Doe is among the most notable. By examining the background, reflecting on the decision, and analyzing the impact of the SFISD V. Doe case,

Application/Analysis: The court agrees that the state has a legitimate interest in protecting its citizens from fraud, but in this instance, the court takes issue with the fact that a sole authority, the secretary of the Public Welfare Council, can decide what is considered a valid religion. The court states that the secretary “is empowered to determine whether the cause is a

The Dred Scott case came at a very turbulent time in American history. It came

Officers responded to North Scott Hall to investigate the report of a 19 year old male UW Oshkosh student checking in with an odor of marijuana on him. The male admitted to smoking marijuana and drinking alcoholic beverages. He was warned for Use of Marijuana and cited for Underage Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages (2nd offense).

Bruce Klunder was not purposefully executed but he was killed standing up for something he believed in. When Joanne began working at the Student Christian Union Joanne and Bruce began to take children on trips to the South. Bruce and Joanne took groups of children on field trips to the South to show the kids the effects of segregation. From there he decided to form the C.O.R.E which was an organization that believed in racial equality. He and the C.O.R.E members went to every protest against unfair housing, and education. “He frequently did picket duty, demonstrating for fair housing, and against segregated public facilities and discrimination in hiring.” (http://ech.case.edu/cgi/article.pl?id=KBW 1997). When he heard about a segregated

After evaluating Skloot's claim in paragraph four on page one hundred thirty, I as well do believe that Southam probably would have continued to inject patients without their permission if it wasn't for the arrangement he made with Emanuel Mandel. Mandel, Southam, and the staff at the Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital(all but three) were going to inject the patients without telling them they contained cancer cells. This is the start of proving that Southam would've still injected patients without their permission because when he had the opportunity he was going to make the staff at the hospital do his research by injecting the patients for him so he wouldn't get in trouble because they weren't necessarily his patients.

The spiritual practices of a nation's citizens are no business of a ruler since his power lies in the legislation and is but a representation of the people's will. Secondly, Kant identifies the tying of a people to an unalterable religious symbol as "wholly impossible." Such an action not only endangers the rational capacity of the immediate recipients, but binds future generations, as well, and as such is intolerable and unjust.

I believe that it´s the same offender in the Parkinson case and the Johnson case, which is making the offender a serial killer because he has killed 3 people and it has been over a period over 30 days. By looking at different serial killer typologies my firm belief is that this offender will fall into the lust serial killer typology. I concluded this by firstly looking if the crimes were act-focused kills or process kills, I concluded it was process kills because the offender had taken the time to abduct both Parkinson and Johnson and didn 't just kill them right away like an act-focused killer would do. With the offender being a process killer he could only be organized as well because process killers cannot be disorganized. The offender would either be a lust killer, power-control killer or a thrill killer. I concluded that the offender in this case would not be a thrill serial killer, since this kind of murderer gets off my seeing his victims suffering, which is the most important factor for this type of offender. In the Parkinson and Johnson murders there were no signs of torture on the victims bodies and therefore I do not believe that this offender would be a thrill serial killer.

Recalling Hunt’s definition of moral regulation describing such a concept as a method of governing where specific attention is paid to a specific group, the image which arises presents a host of government officials overseeing the group which needs to be regulated. However, Hunt draws away from this simple mentality taking a less convention approach arguing that such regulation is not limited to solely government officials arguing it stems from a variety of social bases, from the elite to the disadvantaged. Three distinct positions are identified through which moral regulation occurs, these being; from above, the middle, and below. Moral regulation from above follows the common way of thinking seeing that this method is reliant on government officials and state enforced policies designed to contain a group who appears to be deviating from the normative. The middle ground of moral regulation is condensed with religious organizations and the like which are the only group able to push their agenda

By discussing some of the advantages and disadvantages of administration and politics dichotomy, an opinion of whether it is useful or impossible will be made. Wilson’s politics administration dichotomy refers to the idea that administrative decisions need to be made without political influence. One argument to this is that politics has transformed, let’s say, the role of a city manager from a neutral expert to a problem solver and dichotomy should be replaced with an expanded base of professional values for them.

The purpose of this essay is to discuss the public interest and the administrative responsibility. Discuss some of the recent ethical obligations confronting public administrators in their day to day decision making. Also we will examine the recent trend in privatizing government functions. Finally, we will discuss if privatizing posses any type of dilemma’s for the attainment of public interest.