Compare And Contrast The Sniper And The Man He Killed

someone, is it good or bad? Regretting or happy? “He’s an enemy” he thought. “I don’t regret anything” he said getting angry. He turned from the dead bodies for a second. A person was standing in the distance. He pulled out his gun. Sniper was getting ready to shoot again. The light shined on the person. It was his mother. “Luka” she said. “Luka”. He put his gun down. Then the sniper ran up to his mother and hugged her. Both of them were silent.

The two text are similar for various reasons. They are generally similar because they both have someone attempting to deny or rebel against society or government and they both get are unsuccessful and killed in the end. As seen in Harrison Bergeron this conflict occurs when Harrison

after reading reviews from him thank you ma'am I have came up with a few similarities and one difference one somewhere or is that the setting in another is the characters change of heart the differences how the short stories end

American Sniper by Chris Kyle Do most people worry about getting killed by other countries in the U.S.? Probably not, they trust their troops of active men and women serving for their country. However, in Chris Kyle’s novel American sniper, staying alive is a requirement of the U.S. Navy SEAL. Through characters, conflicts, and theme, Chris Kyle pulls the reader into the story all the way till the last word. After reading this book, people will never look at a american Navy SEAL sniper the same ever again.

Before reading the book American Sniper, I would tell you I was aware of what are military and seal teams do. Now, I can tell you i've never been more wrong. In the book American Sniper the reader gets a first hand account of the battle field and what goes into making someone a Navy Seal through Chris Kyle's personal accounts. Kyle takes the reader through his life beginning with his upbringing in Texas and finishing with his homecoming from war after his fourth deployment. The book is meant to show and encourage other young aspiring people to learn about and possibly pursue a military career, but as Kyle says, “it's not for everyone.” I personally really liked certain aspects of the book, and only disliked a few often repetitive scenes. If you have ever been interested or wondered about what our unsung heros have to go through everyday while you are safe at home than I suggest you give this book a read. I promise you won't be let down.

Fahrenheit 451 and Equilibrium Synthesis essay Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, and Equilibrium, directed by Kurt Wimmer, have similarities and differences. Both of these have conflicts throughout the story but they both express them very differently. In Fahrenheit 451 they are not allowed free thought and books while in Equilibrium they are not allowed emotions. Also in Fahrenheit 451 the characters address things more calmly and in Equilibrium they do things with more violence and aggression.

Are you happy about what you are doing? If you are happy about your task, the task can be easier. By doing something you are passionate about, you feel more fulfilled.

According to dictionary.com justice means “the ideal of fairness and impartially, especially with regard to the punishment of wrongdoing and the reward for right doing.” In my opinion, I strongly agree that justice is served to the main characters in “The Sniper,” “Lather and Nothing Else”and “Vital Factor.” To begin, justice is served in “The Sniper” because the consequences for the protagonist's actions and what he did was correct because it is his task to fight for his side and by doing that he has to kill the opponent.Also, in “Lather and Nothing Else” the character's phenomenon is that the Barber did not kill Captain Torres when he had the chance to do so, and that might be his only chance to get to kill the person who kills people in “Rebels Gang” which the Barber is an informant for. Finally,“Vital Factor” justice was served, when the main characters repercussions are that Crowder got a taste of his own medicine for all the times he used others, his consequences came to play when Wilkins got to go back home. In the three short stories, justice was rightfully

Another commonality they share is that they are both timeless stories and they do not date themselves heavily with pop culture references the exception of this some now out-of date language that is not used any more. Both use deeper meanings and themes that stand the test of time, including the morality of hunting and the mind of a murderer. These two idea’s will remain intriguing for years to come.

First, the plots of both works need to be discussed and explained how they are different. The stories of both works have basically the same

The commonalities that run through both texts are the focus on slavery and the lives of the enslaved people in particular. Both attempt to reveal something about these interesting topics. Both of these texts are set in the time leading up to and during the Civil War.

In these two stories the interlopers, and the machine that won the war there are many differences between the two. There are similarities like the people in the stories wanted to kill someone. Both stories have many differences and some similarities

Situational irony in the two short stories helps to turn ignorant decisions the characters made into unintended repercussions. Both stories have ironic ending lines that define the authors’ true theme. In the case of “The Sniper,” the irony comes when the protagonist goes to examine the body of the man he has just shot. When he arrived “The sniper turned over the dead body and looked into his brother’s face” (O’Flaherty 349). The sniper fought for a cause he believed would make his world better, but instead ended up unknowingly shooting his brother. The sniper acted without knowing for sure what he would affect, but he believed he was doing the right thing, which ended in tragedy. The irony in “The Necklace” comes when Madame Loisel approaches Madame Forestier and explains how awful her life had become because of paying off the debt for the diamond necklace Madame Forestier had loaned her. Madame Forestier responds, “‘You say that you bought a diamond necklace to replace mine?’ ‘Yes; you didn't notice then? They were

beat faster. It was an enemy car. He wanted to fire, but he knew it

“Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind.” This quote is by John Fitzgerald Kennedy to the United Nations General Assembly, September 25th, 1961. What John Fitzgerald Kennedy is actually saying is that if the world does not put an end to, then war will end the world and then there will not be anybody left for the wars to kill. The relationship with this and the two readings is that it shows how war can bring people who have bonded together apart by tearing them apart. Since the beginning of time, war has been tearing people apart by pitting them against each other. It can be either friends vs friends, family vs family, or maybe even neighbors vs neighbors.