The Soft Drink Manufacturing And Carbonated Beverages Market Essay

The soft-drink industry capitalizing on creating the best product. Each product has a different taste, formula, and color to entice the consumer. It is important for the product to remain innovative in order to keep the consumers interested. The suppliers can easily differ, because they do not hold much value or put

Change Lab Solutions. (n.d.). Breaking Down the Chain: A Guide to the Soft Drink Industry. Retrieved from http://changelabsolutions.org/sites/default/files/ChangeLab-Beverage_Industry_Report-FINAL_(CLS-20120530)_201109.pdf

The existing concentrate business is largely controlled by Coca-Cola Company (Coca-Cola) and PepsiCo (Pepsi), together claiming a combined 72% of the U.S. carbonated soft drink (CSD) market sales volume in 2009. Refer to Exhibit 1 for an illustration of the CSD industry value chain. For more than a century, Coca-Cola and Pepsi have maintained growth and large market shares through mastering five competitive forces, shown in Exhibit 2, that drive profitability and shape the industry structure.

The soft drink industry has an oligopoly market structure, with PepsiCo and Coca-Cola being the two main competitors. Coca-Cola is #1 in soda sales, PepsiCo #2 and Dr. Pepper- Snapple #3. Other competitors in the beverage industry are Monster Beverage Corporation, Nestlé S.A., Red Bull GmbH, as well as local and regional companies such as 7-up, Jones Soda, Faygo and Town Club (“Pepsico Inc 's”, n.d). “Approximately 64% and 17% of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo’s valuation, respectively, comes from

The market share of soft drink industry actually has to maintain by spending and investing huge amount of money on advertisement and marketing. The advertising cost of Coca-Cola was $3.3 billion in 2012. Such a high cost makes it very hard for a new competitor to survive in the market and expand visibility. Moreover, due to the highly recognized brand name of Coca-Cola, the strong loyal customers’ base would not easy to switch to a new product. Therefore, it is nearly impossible for a new comer to compete in the soft drink industry.

Today’s global soft drink industry that is worth approximately 511.6 billion dollars can trace its history back to the days when the first mineral water was found in natural springs (Reuters, 2014). According to Bellis (2014) people who started bathing in natural springs instantly realised that it is a healthy thing to do and due to that it was said that mineral water has healing powers. The carbon dioxide or in other words the magic that was behind the bubbles in natural spring water was soon discovered by the first scientists (Bellis, 2014). Later this wonder was the basis of invention of carbonated soft drinks, like coke. The first soft drink which was simple lemonade made out of mineral water, lemon juice and honey was

However, no matter what the advertisements claim, the statistics concerning the shares and value of each company cannot lie. The Coca-Cola Company dominates the soft-drink market by owning four of the global top five soft-drink brands, which include Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta, and Sprite. The Coca-Cola Company makes or licenses more than 400 drink products in more than 200 nations. In 2006, Coca Cola’s sales reached 24,088 million dollars and had a net income of about 5,080 million dollars, with 71,000 employees working in the company. PepsiCo, Incorporated is the largest snack maker and second largest soft-drink maker in the world. It sells beverages and snacks in approximately 200 nations as well. In 2006, its sales reached 35,137 million dollars and had a net income of $5,642 dollars with 168,000 employees working in the company. With these numbers, one can assume that Pepsi is earning more profit if wages payouts are not considered, but Pepsi has a large number of workers working for

The soft drink industry in the United States is a highly profitably, but competitive market. In 2000 alone, consumers on average drank 53 gallons of soft drinks per person a year. There are three major companies that hold the majority of sales in the carbonated soft drink industry in the United States. They are the Coca Cola Company with 44.1% market share, followed by The Pepsi-Cola Company with 31.4% market share, and Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. with 14.7% market share. Each company respectively has numerous brands that it sales. These top brands account for almost 73% of soft drink sales in the United States. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. owns two of the top ten

convenience and gas, fountain, vending, and mass merchandisers (primary part of “Other” in “Cola Wars…”

In 1886, the Coca Cola Company was developed but it wasn't until 1898 that the fierce competitor Pepsi-Cola entered into the market. These 2 companies are the two major players that dominate the consumer beverage (soft-drink) industry. Coke and Pepsi have since been competing to rein the global market in consumer beverages. The market of drinks in the United States alone is valued at more than thirty million dollars annually. With the growth of these two companies, PepsiCo has developed and acquired additional products outside the scope of just the consumer beverage industry, these products have helped the company to increase their exposure and position in the global market. This has not been the case for the Coca Cola Company; they

In 1886, the Coca Cola Company was developed but it wasn 't until 1898 that the fierce competitor Pepsi-Cola entered into the market. These 2 companies are the two major players that dominate the consumer beverage (soft-drink) industry. Coke and Pepsi have since been competing to rein the global market in consumer beverages. The market of drinks in the United States alone is valued at more than thirty million dollars annually. With the growth of these two companies, PepsiCo has developed and acquired additional products outside the scope of just the consumer beverage industry, these products have helped the company to increase their exposure and position in the global market. This has not been the case for the Coca Cola Company; they

When there are industries you can always count on them having competition. The bigger the player, the harder they can play. The big players always attempt to take many of the small competitors. When this happens they can expand their market share. A perfect example for this is the soft drink business; Pepsi and Coke have always been rivals to each other.

In the market, the soft drink industry is currently growing, with hundreds of registered brand names for carbonated soft drinks within the United States.

There are more than 900 registered brand names in the US. The top 10 brands are marketed by the 3 leading US soft drinks companies which are Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and Dr. Pepper/7up. The cola flavor is the most popular of carbonated soft drinks in the US with 65.7% of the market share. The orange flavor comes in 3rd with only 3.9% of the market share. As far as market segments are concerned there are only two segments; the regular carbonated soft drink and the diet carbonated soft drink (Kerin & Peterson, 2007).

The economics of the concentrate business and bottling is different from each other in terms of number and size of rivals and cost structure etc. Concentrate business has few buyers and through its value chain compare to bottling business has many buyer and mid-way player in the soft drink industry. The concentrate manufacturing process involved a little capital investment in machinery, overhead, or labour to reduce the risks whereas bottlers involving high capital investment. Franchise agreements with soft drink industry allowed bottlers to handle the non-cola brand of other concentrate producers. It also allowed bottlers to choose whether to market new beverages introduced by a concentrate producer. Concentrate producers product cost structure is mostly based on variable costs such as advertising, promotion, market research, and bottler support however, bottler products cost constitution is mostly based on fixed costs and have higher cost leverage. Concentrate producers also took charge of negotiating customer development agreements with nationwide retailers such as Wal-Mart. Concentrate producers collaborated to make more profitable control with bottlers, for example, raw material negotiation with suppliers and sales price