The Stages of Group Development

“What do you care what I think anyway? I do not even count, right? I could disappear forever and it would not make any difference.” These are common thoughts that people may experience as they advance through Tuckman's stages of group development. In the 1985 movie, The Breakfast club, all five stages of Tuckman's group development can be seen.The Breakfast Club is about a group of students who unfortunately broke school rules, and was given detention as punishment. They had to complete nine long hours of detention. Although, they go to the same school, and the know of each other, they do not know each other. Superficially, the students do not have anything in common. As the time passes while they are in detention, the students began to confide

Working in a group to achieve a high quality group project can be one of people’s most difficult school experiences. Working in a group is tough because there is often someone who does not pull their own weight. “There are five stages to group development, adjourning, forming, storming, performing, and norming” (John & Wiley pg 166). Christine’s group from the Case Study the Forgotten Group Member is in between the Storming and Norming Stages. The Storming Stage “is dealing with tensions and defining group tasks,” while the Norming Stage is dealing with high emotionality and tension among the group members” (John & Wiley pg. 166). Christine and her group could have had better

In today's session, Group members were presented with education regarding the stages of change and the characteristic of each stage of change. Group members were then identified and shared which stage of change that he/she presently was in; and discuss how to progress to the next stage of change.

Norming - this is the stage “it can be done”. Group cohesion takes place. Ref: Ann Gravells as above.

The four stages of group development are forming, storming, norming, and performing. None of the stages have to go in a particular order. Forming is the first stage where people join together for a reason. Our group formed because this class put us together, which was mainly based on the need to fulfill the goal of passing Small Group Communication and doing a service project together. This happened when we filled out the sheets about our skills and whom we would and would not like to work with. We were then all introduced to our new groups in class.

The Performing stage was the last stage of Bruce Tuckman's four stages of group development until the 70's when Tuckman felt the importance to create an additional fifth stage to his model the "adjourning" which became the last stage. A group (shift) reaches the performing when all it members solves the conflict in the Norming stage therefore had establish the norms of the group and the members are operate as one. Thus, the group identity is finalized, in our experience it was a unique one.

The phases of group improvement are Shaping: a gathering of individuals meet up to finish a common reason. Their underlying achievement will rely on upon their commonality with each other's work style, their experience on past groups, and the lucidity of their doled out mission.

Working as part of a group, was a lot more complicated than I had expected. Specifically I learned that not every member of the group approaches the project with the same degree of seriousness and interests. Some members of the group, like myself enjoyed doing the research and gathering information on our topic. Other members, hated doing the actual research, but totally enjoyed making the video and webpage. Still other members, chose the dreaded path of procrastination. These were the member who kind of soured me on group work. I felt it wasn’t right for some members to do a lot of work and others

For growth and development of a group you must go through the stages of group life, which consist of the beginning, middle, and end. According to Tuckman, the path that you follow is forming, storming, norming, and performing.

Tuckman proposes that groups develop via five stages; forming, storming, norming, performing and finally adjourning (Archee, Gurney, & Mohan, 2013a). The first stage, known as forming, involves clarifying the task and purpose of the group, and identifying boundaries of both the task and interpersonal behaviour (Archee et al., 2013a). For the presentation task we were randomly allocated into groups. This worried me greatly as I have struggled in the past with group members who do not contribute equally or see the task as important as other group members. To avoid this problem, the group collectively determined and agreed upon a number of ground rules. For example, we decided that all group members were expected to contribute equally to the presentation, all group members were expected to attend and contribute at all group meetings, and all group members would adhere to agreed upon deadlines. Having failed to do this in previous group assignments, this clarification stage

The Tuckman Model of Group Development has 5 stages: Forming, Storming, Norming, and Adjourning (Maples, 2008). During the first session of MOP, everyone was tasked with forming their own small project team. The very first class workshop activity involved meeting two new people and introducing one of them to the entire class. The aim of the activity was to indirectly assess who we would want to be in a team with, based on our perceptions of a person’s behaviour, values, and work ethic. Most people would want to be in a team with people similar to them on a surface level (age, gender, ethnicity) and on a deeper level (personality, attitudes, believes, values) (Liang, Shih, & Chiang, 2015). We were free to choose whoever we wanted in our team under the condition that the team we form is diverse.

Storming is one of the more difficult stages of group development and can often lead to team tension and potential failure. Stein (2014) adds that behaviors during the Storming stage may be less polite than during the Forming stage, with frustration or disagreements about goals, expectations, roles and responsibilities being openly expressed. Members may express frustration about constraints that slow their individual or the team's progress; this frustration might

Group development- The development of a group normally goes through the following stages (Tuckman 1965)

The forming – storming – norming – performing. My team was formed by our module instructor which obviously gave us a guide to execute our group task. When it comes to storming, we encountered a hitch because one our group member was inactive all through and that initially hindered our functionality as tasks were delegated to each member. Our disagreement or hitch in the group was due to unavailability of one group member which affected us immensely but we handled it by assigning the task to another group member and communicated swiftly to our instructor about the situation. Our group tasks were already delegated to each member and we knew what was expected of us to perform optimally and score

In a group project, there should always be someone that must be the leader. Someone that will be organizing the group, taking all the responsibility, and see that everyone was doing the work. A leader is someone that others would look at, and follow what he/she says. As a leader of a group, you compromised yourself to your position, and try to succeed so others can do their work perfectly.