The Standards For The Iasb And The Ifrs Foundation

Despite those enormous advantages, it has been argued that IFRSS adoption lead to significant costs. The main argument is that IFRSs do not consider local needs and priorities as every country has their own ‘business environment, legal systems, cultures, language and political environment’ (Henderson and Peirson, 2000 cited from Malthus, S., 2004). However, to overcome this problem, IASB can accommodate flexible reporting standards that enable companies to choose alternatives that are more suitable for their external condition. It is opinion of some opponents of IFRS adoption that IAS is ‘insufficiently detailed’ (Uddin,M.S., 2005, p.4) that require accountants’ and auditor’ professional judgment. However, overly detail might be contra productive and not flexible in anticipating every changes and differences.

In May 2008, the AICPA’s Governing Council designated the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) as the body authorized to establish international financial accounting and reporting principles under rule 202 and 203 of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. Below is an illustrative Independent Auditor’s Report on financial statements issued in conformity with IFRS.

As stated earlier, the IASB arose from specific needs of the accounting industry and the public. As international trade has increased, the need for transnational accounting information has increased as well. This sparked the demand for development of international accounting standards to make financial data between countries more comparable. In 1973, the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) was formed to develop these international standards. The standards issued by the IASC, prior to 2001, were called International Accounting Standards (IASs). In 2001, the IASC made the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) the official international standard-setting body. The standards issued by the IASB are called International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) (Schroeder, Clark, & Cathey, 2011, p. 82-87).

A joint convergence committee created the members of (FASB) and (IASB). (IASB) is recognized as an independent accounting standard-setting body that is similar to (FASB) that joins (GAAP), and is governed by the (IFRS) foundation. Due to this convergence, (AICPA) believes U.S. adoption of a single set of high-quality, globally accepted accounting standards will benefit U.S. financial markets and public companies by enabling preparation of transparent and comparable financial reports throughout the world, (American Institute of CPAs, 2016). Secondly, (AICPA) is dedicated to supplying the whole accounting profession with information, tools and IFRS.com for instance to assimilate as well as implement a new set of standards. As the (AICPA) supports continual convergence of reliable accounting standards between (IFRS) and (GAAP) the mission of completion between (IASB) and (FASB) is prolonged. (AICPA) will always support funding mechanisms of the body-making

For nearly half a century, a movement has been underway to establish a high-quality, comprehensive set of international accounting standards, with the goal of facilitating international trade and investment. In the global capital market, differences in the rules of accounting for the purposes of recognition, measurement, and reporting of financial results have impaired the smooth transfer of information across borders. Given that it accounts for nearly a third of the global market, there is considerable pressure for the United States to conform to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as promulgated by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). While moving to a single set of accounting standards could create

The FASB has the mission of create and improve the accounting standards and the financial reports by the nongovernmental organizations, offering useful information that allows investors and other users to make decisions. The implementation and improvement of the standards is made taking into consideration the opinion of all the parties interested and it is supervised by the Financial Accounting Foundation’s Board of Trustees. This process open to the public participation warranty the transparency into the standards-setting process. Therefore, the FASB issue a variety of reports requesting feedbacks on its standards setting activities. (FASB, Standard-setting process, n.d.)

On November 18, 2002 the FASB and IASB came together at a meeting in Norwalk, Connecticut to start the wheels in motion for the purpose of establishing a new set of financial standards. The FASB and IASB are committed to create financial standards that will be accepted both domestically and internationally that are of high quality and compatible for financial reporting. At present more than a 100 countries already use the International Financial Reporting Standards. The U.S. at present has not accepted a changed in accounting procedures; therefore, this is going to be a major task for both the FASB and IASB to complete successfully this union. I do believe that the partnership between the FASB and IASB will achieve the goals of creating a common financial reporting set of standards that will be accepted by all.

Still in flux: Future of IFRS in U.S. remains unclear after SEC report. (n.d.). Retrieved January 16, 2015, from http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2012/Sep/20126059.htm

In 1973, the private sector International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was formed. The IASB is a natural extension of a global market that has been evolving over the last three decades. The IASB formulates and publishes accounting standards to be observed when presenting financial statements and promote their global acceptance. As an overarching mission, the IASB works to improve and harmonize accounting standards, regulations, and procedures as it relates to financial statements. IASB standards provide a reference model and set of examples for financial reporting in developing countries. The IASB has no authority with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) or the Securities and

International standards on auditing were set to provide guidance for audits conducted all over the world. As globalization becomes more prevalent, it is essential that these standards are set to provide guidance in the conductions of audits internationally. Even though there are international standards, each country can develop their own set of standards and adopt some of the aspects of the international standards on auditing. However, there is no requirement that the standards set in a particular country have to be completely identical to those provided by the IAASB. Both the US and China are powerful world leaders with their hands in investments all around the globe. As there is always a risk of financial reporting fraudulency, it is essential that each country has their own standards when it comes to conducting an audit in their country. In the US, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) established Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) to be used as guidance for the CPA’s who are engaged to perform an audit. However, after the the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) was created to oversee the audits of public companies in order to protect stakeholders interest in the preparation of informative, accurate and independent audit reports. Even non-U.S. public accounting firms that audit or play a substantial role in the audit of U.S. issuers, brokers, and dealers are subject to oversight by the

On 1st April 2001, a new body named as International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) took over the responsibility of ISAC for setting International Accounting Standards. The IASB adopted the existing IAS issued by ISAC and standards of Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC). However, the new standards developed and issued by IASB are known as International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

The existing Conceptual Framework of IASB’s was developed by its predecessor body IASC (International Accounting Standards Committee) in 1989. The material on the objective of financial reporting was first revised by the IASB in 2010 with the US national standard-setter, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). This ED sets out the proposal for a revised Conceptual framework. It has been developed on the behalf of responses received on (‘the Discussion Paper) which was published in July 2013. (IFRS, May 2015)

International Accounting standards board (IASB) with its capable team of professionals issues International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in order to deal with the problem of asymmetric information. The main purpose of standards is to provide information to the users as to the basis on which the accounts have been prepared to bring about uniformity in financial reporting and to ensure consistency in the data published by enterprises. The general idea is to harmonize accounting standards around the world, however there are contrasting views on the subject.

The IASB has complete control over of all the methodical matters concerning the IFRS which includes:

Recently, on July of year 2009, the International Accounting Standards’ Board (IASB) released the International Financial Reporting Standards for Small and Medium-Sized Entities (IFRS for SMEs) .