The Standards Of Accounting Standards

The field of accounting is constantly evolving. This is true not only for the theory of accounting itself but also the entities that govern its theory and practice. Presently, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) are faced with some of the biggest challenges to date. To understand the significance of these two boards, it is necessary to understand their histories, relations between the boards, and the standards that they set. Also how the knowledge of these boards and the field they lead, gained through the masters of science in accountancy

A joint convergence committee created the members of (FASB) and (IASB). (IASB) is recognized as an independent accounting standard-setting body that is similar to (FASB) that joins (GAAP), and is governed by the (IFRS) foundation. Due to this convergence, (AICPA) believes U.S. adoption of a single set of high-quality, globally accepted accounting standards will benefit U.S. financial markets and public companies by enabling preparation of transparent and comparable financial reports throughout the world, (American Institute of CPAs, 2016). Secondly, (AICPA) is dedicated to supplying the whole accounting profession with information, tools and IFRS.com for instance to assimilate as well as implement a new set of standards. As the (AICPA) supports continual convergence of reliable accounting standards between (IFRS) and (GAAP) the mission of completion between (IASB) and (FASB) is prolonged. (AICPA) will always support funding mechanisms of the body-making

The globalization of markets over the past 50 years has led to the demand for increasingly comparable financial statements across countries. In response to this demand, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was formed with the purpose of developing a set of high quality global accounting standards. Although a majority of developed markets have adopted the international standards, the United States has not. One reason for the delay in adoption is that many of the standards are very similar. However, there are also several key differences between the two. Presently, the United States Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the IASB have

Financial accounting has become more complex as our country grows. The United States has established a core financial body to ensure all financial statements are published within the prescribed guidelines so that any creditor or investor is able to read and understand the information. The FASB was created to ensure that these guidelines are followed and they are well-paid individuals so there is little chance of them keeping ties with their private firms which creates a trust with the public. The FASB crated a conceptual framework that all companies must adhere to. This ensures that investors, creditors and the public receive an honest

The effort of moving towards international convergence of accounting standards has risen since the end of World War II, resulting to the revolution of financial reporting. “IFRS for example are accounting standards issued by the IASB, an independent organisation based in London, UK” (Ball, 2006). IASB is primarily established to promulgate IFRS and are responsible to set rules that can be equivalently implemented by public companies internationally. Uniform accounting standards are simply demanded in order to produce a comparable accounting information as many big companies begin to enlarge their territory beyond their home country. Therefore, many professionals believe that a transparent and understandable financial reporting could be produced by using uniform standards. However, the competency of uniform standards alone in producing uniform financial reporting is arguable due to significant factors. The existence of varieties in capitalism by individual countries have restricted the ability of uniform standards in regulating local financial reporting. Plus, the distinction in institutional influences make it harder for uniform standards to work efficiently in various political conditions and to agree with different types of regional legal structures. Besides, cultures and religions also play an important role in accounting industry as they have the power to shape national economies. Therefore, regardless of many benefits that uniform standards could bring, there are

With the number of countries that have switched to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for their financial reporting, as well as the continued efforts made between the IFRS and US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP), it is evident that international convergence is an overall appealing idea for global reporting. With that said, US GAAP has worked with IFRS to create a universal standard; and while progress has been made to diminish variances between the standards, there are still large, if not unattainable, efforts ahead of us. The hype over a proposed uniform set of global accounting standards appears to be stunted by the lost efforts in the convergence project between the US GAAP and IFRS. As the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) moves forward with its standards setting, there must be a reevaluation of the goal for reporting standards and efforts with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

The international financial accounting standards is a non for profit private sector. Their aim is to serve the public interests. With the growing globalisation of business and finance, it has stimulated a standardisation of accounting standards among countries. This measure aims to

The International Accounting Standards Boards (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) are making an effort to converge to develop International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by gathering accounting standards that can be used in financial reporting whether it is in the home country or in the host country. Both the International Accounting Standards Board and the US FASB have proven to be vital promoters of the globalization of international financial accounting standards (Kirsch, 2012). These efforts have focused on a cohesive setting that will eliminate the controversy that revolves around accounting standards. I will present to you the facts and differences between the two, state the facts and identify

Across the world, many businesses and markets have adopted the use of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). People and organizations in the business world are increasingly demanding conformity and this has necessitated the shift from the U.S Generally Accepted Accounting Standards to the IFRS. However, in the United States, there is still much reluctance to adopt this change and these has caused a lot of heated debate on whether the businesses and markets should conform to the rest of the world.

By means of conceptual framework, FASB is able to issue consistent useful standards. However FASB has been criticized for not having a formal post-implementation of standards for reviewing the effect of a newly issued accounting standard [Christine, 2011]. But the biggest criticism that the US standard setting board was more rules based and should take a more principles based approach which is more associated with IASB but it can also be said that FASB uses the principles to somewhat produce the rules for the preparers of accounting statement [Schipper 2003].

Though IASC worked hard to achieve a global accounting standard, it failed due to various factors. One of the main factor was that “A standard that is being accepted by one authority should also be accepted by other authority as well.” But IASC failed in this factor since these standards were not accepted by other leading jurisdiction.

(a)On 1 January 2005,all the stock exchange listed companies in Europe adopted the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) written by the international Accounting Standards Boards. According to IASB, the setting body of IFRS, their primary objective is to develop a set of high quality, transparent ,understandable, global accepted financial standards in the public interest (IFRS 2015) . Furthermore, the statement made by European Commission also explained the benefits including the elimination of barriers to international trades, the increasing of transparency and comparability of company accounts, the improvement of comprehensive strength and the rapid promotion of economic growth (Commission 2002). Based on the public

Since 2005, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) have encouraged countries to adopt a set of accounting standards that is internationally recognised in order to improve transparency between users and providers of financial reports. The understandability and interpretation are also important factors behind the driving forces of implementing such a standard.

With the globalization of international trades, it is necessary to design a common accounting language to compare the financial performance of companies from different countries. For this reason, International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) publish the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) which are principle-based in order to improve the quality of financial reporting and to harmonize accounting standards in 2001.

With the globalization of international trades, it is necessary to design a common accounting language to compare the financial performance of companies from different countries. For this reason, International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) publish the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) which are principle-based in order to improve the quality of financial reporting and to harmonize accounting standards in 2001.