The Stanley Street Mystery-Personal Narrative

After a long day of pondering who the murderer was, Officer Darren decided to go out for a drink at the local pub. He saw Mr. Craill across the bar, and watched as he ate a huge meal consisting of a hamburger, fries, beers, steak, and mashed potatoes. It was quite peculiar that Mr. Craill was able to afford such a meal, because he did only have a part time job at a small town burger joint. Several things seemed suspicious that day about Mr. Craill, especially the fact that the gate that separated Craill’s yard from Dorothy’s yard was open along with Craill and Dorothy’s back

Recently a guy Named Ronald Lee Moore, who is now dead, had been linked to the death of a 17 girl that was strangled. Deirdre says, “ What makes more sense? That little seventeen- year old, never been in trouble with the law Adnan killed someone or that Ronald Lee Moore, rapist and murderer who got out of prison thirteen days before Hae disappeared, that he killed someone?” (Koenig, “What We Know”). It could have been that man, because he killed one girl already. What would be stopping him from killing another? When the investigators went to Leakin Park they found a few items. The condom wrapper, shell casings, rope, and liquor bottle found in the park near the burial site were never tested for DNA (Koenig, “ Leakin Park”). With the DNA evidence actually being tested, they could effortlessly tell who may have been involved or not, because you can’t just acquire another person’s DNA without them touching the object. Another point that needs to be brought to the table is that it could have been Mr. S. that found the body. He says he pulled off because he had to pee from the 22-ounce Budweiser he was drinking (Koenig, “Leakin Park”) For one, who pulls off and goes to the bathroom in a park known for burying dead bodies? In addition, it takes a pretty shady person to drink alcohol before arriving back to work. Also, what would be the chances of him walking to the

The numerous similarities and differences were profound between the stories “Invitation to a Murder” and “The Dying Detective”. A commonality is the fact that both stories were foul-play mysteries. In “Invitation to a Murder”, the reader was led to believe that the murder of Gregory Abbot would be a physical assault as there were a variety of murder weapons resting the center table. Among those weapons was a long- bladed kitchen knife, an iron pipe, a thin strand of wire with wooden grips on each end, an amber bottle with skull and crossbones, and a revolver. Additionally, this led the reader to believe that these items would somehow be used by Eleanor Madeline Abbot to murder her husband. Moreover, Mrs. Abbot did not inform the men that the

The case I chose to write on is based on a DVD that we watched in class called ‘Beaten by a hair’. In this case, a woman was reported missing after she went to work and never returned home. After the police discovered a bloody pillow case in the woods, near her house, they linked it to the missing pillow case in the woman’s room, and then realized that they had a murder case on their hands. A mystery in the case was that one of the local neighbors had mentioned seeing the woman leave through the front door of her house but the evidence says different, so investigators had to find out who left the house that morning. I am interested in this case because it was very intriguing how the forensic officers put all the pieces

Last night London was startled by a crime of incredible ferocity and rendered all the more notable by the high position of the victim. Sir Danvers Carew, a MP, was murdered not far from the Thames River on the alleyway close to the Billy Goat Tavern. This happened at around eleven until two in the night. He was clubbed to death with a heavy cane. There is no apparent motive for Sir Carew’s murder.

Hello, good afternoon everyone, I would like to give special thanks to everyone who has attended trial today, especially the jury and the judges. this today I am presenting my side of who is the killer in the night drive. In the short story, Night Drive, we were left with a major question at the end of the story. Who is the killer on the frighteningly eerie Colchester road? The evidence we have concluded from the broad sources that we have, we think that Mr. Tabor is the killer. Now we will verbally express our evidence to support our claim.

I, Detective Wilde, am being assigned the opportunity of a lifetime! Solving the murder of Richard Webster is what's going to determine whether I receive a spotlight in the newspaper. Business has been slow lately so this will help pick it up. Ahead of the interrogation, I gathered data on the victim and each of the suspects. Some background research shows that the Webster Network of co-workers are troubled: Richard, a class A jerk, Hugh, a broken businessman, Rita, in a troublesome relationship, H.T., a misanthrope, Dee, too loyal, Del, a sloth and victim’s cousin, Justin, once jailed for computer hacking. I am going to tactfully style my questions so they will be spouting a fountain of truth. According to my calculations, everyone who is

It was the midst of day, June 30, 20--; an ill-pleasuring mess had been proposed to the police of Detroit. The corpse of an old, clumsy, joke of a gentlemen, found covered in newspaper dumped into a dumpster. The corpse was dismantled, mangled, and at the same time of many other killings. The detective, Ms. Liu, immediately concluded the cause of death and the murder weapon.

On Thursday last week, two murders have taken place. Myrtle Wilson, wife to a small garage owner, was hit and killed instantly by a speeding car two evenings ago. She had run out into the middle of the street for unknown reasons when the ‘death car’ hit her. The car was allegedly a yellow or green color and was guessed to be traveling around 40 miles per hour when it hit Myrtle. This car was coming from New York; it swerved a little but did not stop when passing

for possession of stolen vehicle and they would be arriving in the area to take

They brought her down to the station to be questioned. There were two people in this tight, dark, eerie room. The police and Miss strangeworth stared intensely at each other for what felt like hours. It was silence but you could hear Miss Strangeworth crying of fear. The officer began to ask simple questions. He started with the ‘who’ of this investigation. “I am the only one writing these letters” she confesses “But I have a letter on almost everyone in this small town.” The officer asks for how long she has been writing these letters

That’s the 2nd one in 3 weeks, exclaimed Detective Clyde Allen saying this while looking down at the brainless body in the dumpster. ‘’it’s past the coindences, were looking for an individual. These murders must be connected in someway. ‘’ said Allen’s partner Karl Jefferies. Seeing there are no witnesses to these crimes we’re going to have to see if there is a connection between the threee and that might give us a lead’’ said Allen to Jefferies.

David Birnie, an Australian Serial Killer was known for abducting, raping and killing. He was responsible for killing four women partnered with his girlfriend Catherine Birnie between October and November 1986. The murder took place in the suburbs of Perth in Willagee, in the house that was classified as the ‘House of Horrors’, Moore house street, Perth Western Australia. In David’s attempt to rape the fifth victim and later on kill her, she narrowly escaped from the couple’s house, half naked running across the street shouting for help. Later on with the Police arriving at the Birnie’s doorstep, the couple were arrested and interrogated for several hours. David being the first to confess, was sentenced to four consecutive sentences of life imprisonment in 1987 and twenty years later he committed suicide by hanging himself in his cell on October 7, 2005. This case study will integrate the Psychological research and theory to outline about the causes of Birnie’s behaviour, and why he offended.

As if to build up to the change in writing styles, Washburn begins the story of the crime scene with a briefly detailed overview of the weather conditions and the time of year the murder occurs. They are described as being “a slow moving storm…bringing several inches of snow” and “the Saturday night after New Year’s Eve” respectively (163). So the story goes, Sheriff Parker leaves the police station to make his final rounds on Sunday morning just before he is to be relieved from his shift and, in the process, comes upon the frozen body of Elsie where upon which the writing style takes an immediate shift. As if recounting the obsessive detail of a scene within one of Arthur Conan Doyle’s tales of the great Sherlock Holmes, Washburn begins the scene’s analysis through the emptiness of the scene,

We go to the end of the nineteenth century to Canada. In Toronto, terrible and mysterious murders commit. Detective William Murdoch gets involved. He is already experienced person in his sphere, because of that he tries to use his own methods of investigation. Murdoch calls his methods a new science forensics. Forensic doctor Julia Ogden supports him. She is loyal and always ready to help. Julia can give advice and explore the bodies. William is very