The Statement Of The Marshall Plan, 1947

First and foremost, a great deal of Europe’s success would not have happened without its initial aid from the United States. After helping destroy so much of the continent, the U.S. pumped billions and billions of dollars back into the European economy through The Marshall Plan. It was named after Secretary of State George C. Marshall, who said “The world of suffering people looks to us for leadership. Their thoughts, however, are not concentrated alone on this problem. They have more immediate and terribly pressing concerns where the mouthful of food will come from, where they will find shelter tonight, and where they will find warmth. Along with the great problem of maintaining the peace we must solve the

Citizens of Europe were living in shambles (See Fig 2). Politically, Americans knew spreading capitalistic ways in Europe would gain support from the Europeans, giving the United States trade partners. During the Cold War, Germany became the center of all the tensions between Capitalism and Communism. Germany was the ideal gateway between East and West Europe. Its location made it a suitable place for these political struggles to occur. This angered the Soviets because they too wanted to influence their ways on Europe. The Marshall Plan, following the Truman Doctrine-- which supplied $400 million to countries under totalitarian regimes (Turkey and Greece), appeared to be another anti-communist move made by the United States. However, the United States still successfully achieved the goal of making Europe economically stable.

The speech was created primarily Charles Bohlen, a Soviet expert and Marshall’s special assistant, and later revised by Marshall. Department officials, including George Kennan and William Clayton saw the Marshall Plan as a way of restricting Communist growth in Europe, by strengthening the struggling democratic European nations . After the end of WWII in 1945, the majority of Europe was in ruins; over a third of the European industry was destroyed by the war, resulting in weak economies, and millions of people unemployed and starving, causing low morale. As economies were not improving at a rapid enough pace, combined with high unemployment and a hungry population, people started to look for change. Communism began to look promising, and was becoming increasingly popular in Europe through rebels and partisans. In an attempt confine the spread of Communism, Marshall was sent to Moscow to negotiate with Stalin. Initially, Stalin welcomed the possibility of Soviet participation in a U.S funded European reconstruction program. However, Stalin opposed the “idea of a coordinated multilateral aid programme, which was seen to threaten the Soviet political and economic position in Eastern Europe”, and withdrew all support and insisted that

“The originally propagated view that the Marshall Plan was an altruistic endeavour … has long been dismissed.” Instead, “The overwhelming body of literature looks at the Marshall Plan either from a political and diplomatic or from an economic viewpoint.” Overall, the Plan was primarily motivated by the former, rather, than the later, albeit both were heavily intertwined. This is because containment and a fear of Soviet expansion categorised US foreign policy for much of the postwar period, with economic considerations being the method used, to enact this policy of containment.

The American policy of Marshall Aid sparked both huge appraisal and significant opposition, and to this day it is debated whether it was purely a policy of self-interest and an imposition of America’s political and economic views on a weak and vulnerable Europe, or alternatively one of the greatest acts of altruism and generosity in modern history. It was enormously successful, ‘It was the most unambiguously and triumphantly successful of all America’s post-war policies’ , and helped to create a foundation on which Europe could become an economic power. While there were benefits to America which may have been interpreted as attempts to increase American power and inflamed opposition to the Marshall Plan, the administering of economic aid

The Marshall Plan was significant because it rebuilt Europe and helped in the policy of containment, stopping the spread of communism. It also caused the countries the US helped to trade with the US, helping the US eventually make up the money and be rich.

President Truman created many organizations to help people in Europe that were being ruled by Communists. For example, Senator George Marshall created The Marshall Plan which gave economic and military to European countries. The plan was put into order to hopefully prevent the economic dislocation, which would eventually lead to communism. The outcome of the Marshall Plan was that economies became better which lead to an increase in industrial productions. Also in 1948, the United States flew supplies to Germany for eleven months in response to the

After world war 2, Europe was in destruction and corruption, therefore, giving a meaning to The Marshall Plan speech because, it dealt with a major situation going on back at that time. Another example why this speech is an effective speech is, that he has all the elements a speech needs. Pathos, Ethos and Logos. He gives emotion and information needed for the audience, grabbing their attention and making them want to listen to what he had to say.

With over 13 billion dollars in aid being delivered to Europe under the Marshall Plan, from 1948 to 1952 many European economies grew at an unprecedented rate. The mutual assistance of the aid led to softening of national competition between many countries in Europe, and served the dual purposes of modernization and cooperation for European countries. At the same time as the Marshal plan was being implemented, the Soviet Union enacted what was know as the, “Cominform” that sought to counter the American influence in post war Europe. This program organized by the Kremlin would work with communist parties in European countries through propaganda efforts to

Source G is an extract from ‘The Unfortunate Legacy of the Marshall Plan’ written by Walter Coffey from 1941-1945. The source is describing how many critics argued that the Marshall Plan was drawn up simply to ensure that European markets stayed open for U.S. Exports. If Europe was left to its own efforts then it wouldn’t remain open to American business in the same way as the past and this would negatively impact on American trade and business. The Marshall Plan was the predecessor to many American foreign aid programs for the future. The programs consist of government-to-government contributions with no guarantees they will actually go toward helping those most in need. Therefore, source G is critical of Marshall Plan.

In June 1947, the United States announced the Marshall Plan, intended to help economic recovery in Europe and thus prevent the spread of Communism in a Europe that was increasingly becoming “a breeding ground of hate”, thus providing a comforting environment for the rise of the Marxist ideology. At first, the Marshall Plan seemed to be a success, with economic aid worth $17 billion being made available to Europe and ensuring the protection of democratic governments in Turkey and Greece. Marshall Aid did help economic recovery in Europe, erasing unemployment and improving living standards greatly. Most Western European nations were happy to accept American aid in order to redevelop their economies. However, Stalin forbade any Eastern European countries from accepting the Plan and setup organizations like the Cominform and Comecon instead, to further tighten Stalin’s grip over Eastern Europe.

The foreign policy of the United States during the Cold War fully supported the growth of democratic nations. The USSR, however, wanted countries to become communist like them. These opposing views led to tension between the two nations. As a result, in 1947, President Truman issued the Truman Doctrine which stated that the United States would supply aid to any country as long as they pledged to be democratic. The Marshall plan was enacted in 1948 and it was similar to the Truman Doctrine except it provided financial aid to these countries. In the late 1940s and early 1950s, the United States used its foreign policy to help countries resist communist influence.

 The utilization of the Marshall plan by the USA to assist West Germany was justified as a presentational method. By stabilizing the German government

The economy of Europe was crippled after the war and one of the first actions taken by the Eastern powers was the Marshall Plan. The countries that participated were given a startup fund and were brought into the United States’ economical orbit helping them get back up on their feet. Germany for instance was reduced to rubble by Allied bombing leaving businesses and homes in pieces. They had to build from the ground up but with the help of the US and other nations. After the combination of the 3 Western Allies zones they created a single new currency the Deutsche Mark. The Soviets feared that this would crucially devalue their already hyperinflated Reichsmarks that were used in the east. This crippled the Soviets hold on Berlin as well as Germany.