The Strategic Differences Of Sony And Samsung Electronics On Sustaining Competitive Advantages

There is need to consider several things when we talk about operations and future of a business. Expanded through a minor export business in Daegu, Korea, Samsung has emerged as one of the prominent corporations in electronics around the globe (Samsung, 2015). Samsung has major emphasis on electronic appliances and digital media, memory, system integration, and semiconductors. At present, Samsung has always created innovation through top quality practices and products that are accepted around the global. This paper will present SWOT analysis and Porter model of five forces for Samsung and propose the opportunities to increase profitability and competitiveness. This paper also comprises a

1. Does Samsung have a competitive advantage? If so, how are they creating added-value compared to industry competitors? Make sure to quantify your claims. (In answering this question, you will find helpful information in exhibits 6-7k (but not only there)).

This study seeks to examine the market structure and strategy of Samsung Company analyzing its micro-environmental level as well as SWOT analysis. In this regard, it is worth pointing out that Samsung is a well-established company. It manufactures different electronics products including home appliances and smartphones. It has been on the market since 1969. Its electronics division has 169 subsidiaries and affiliates, which are divided into three to include Consumer Electronics, Information Technology & Mobile Communications, and Device Solutions division (Samsung 2016, 2). In this precept, consumer Electronics focuses on advanced technology, exclusive design and significant offers for presenting new products such as TV, Refrigerator, Air Conditioner, and Medical equipment among other products. Information Technology & Mobile Communications division, on the other hand, produces mobile handset and customer friendly communication products. The Device Solutions in the same dictum division focuses on display pane and semiconductor products. The company has grown globally, and establishes outlets in different parts of the world, including the U.K.

“There are 2 types of Competitive Advantage. Firms with lower relative cost than rivals have a Cost Advantage. Firms that are able to charge higher prices (have a higher WTP) than their competitors have a Differentiation Advantage. Firms that have both, low cost and high WTP, have Dual Advantage”( Proenca,Jose).

This essay attempts to identify and analyse Samsung’s key features in their operations management. Operations Management is defined as the process where resources, flowing within a defined system (Kumar & Suresh 2009), are combined and transformed in a controlled manner to add value. These incorporate elements such as products, processes, technology, and equipment or quality control systems (Garrido, Martín-Peña & García-Muiña 2007, p. 2119). In addressing these elements the essay wishes to capture, which of these influence Samsung’s abilities successfully to obtain their competitive priorities (Garrido, Martín-Peña & García-Muiña 2007, p. 2120) and process strategies.

By the end of 2012, Samsung electronics become the largest producer of televisions and mobile phone. In order to achieve the success and the dramatic rise in consumer electronics sector, the company initiated new methods to innovate and create high quality products .

As we all known, Sony and Matsushita are two of the largest consumer electronic makers in Japan or even in the world. And in this reading, it points out the different strategies Sony and Matsushita use when they were facing the fierce competition in China ----- Matushita was accelerating its pace on stretching the supply chain in China while Sony unexpectedly decided to shift some of its manufacturing business in China back to Japan. In this article, I will discuss the reasons that lead them to make different decision as well as analysize the advantages and the disadvantages of their decision.

Royal Philips NV and Matsushita (owner of the Panasonic brand among others) are two of the world’s biggest electronics multinationals. After successfully building their global empires in the early twentieth century, they have both suffered financially in recent decades. It is therefore interesting to look at why this has happened and what their future prospects are.

On being operational in the global market, Samsung has been subjected to various kinds of pressure. Therefore, the focus of this report is show while formulating an international strategy how Samsung should take both environment factors into consideration that will shape their business approach. The analytical business tools namely PESTLE and Porter Five Forces will be used to understand the micro and macro environment drivers of Samsung’s strategy.

ii. Strategies for Competitive Advantage: 1. Differentiation- better at or different 2. Cost Leadership- cheaper 3. Rapid Response

Since then Apple has launched 6 generations of iPhone and has been the best performing smart phone maker. The company relied on its core competencies that include technology, design, innovation, operating system and exclusivity and is the best example of the inside- out strategic approach. The approach followed by Apple has been proactive and the products were developed accordingly.

Competitive strategy is the moves and methods that the firm has taken and is taking to appeal buyers, improve its market position, and to endure competitive pressures. The strategy is about what a firm’s capability to try to knock off competitors and attain competitive advantage, which can be offensive or defensive. There are three approaches to competitive strategy, which are low-cost leadership strategy where struggling to be the overall low-cost manufacturer in the in industry. Moreover, pursuing to distinguish one’s product offering from competitors (differentiation strategy), and the last one is focus or niche strategy where aiming on thin portion of the market rather than the whole market (Porter, 1998).

Competitive advantage is explained by Mahoney and Pandian (1992) as the function of industry analysis, organizational governance and the firm’s effects in the form of resource advantages and strategies. In order for a firm to be competitive it must adapt to the volatile business environment and through strategic management decisions establish a competitive advantage that will ultimately produce superior performance relative to its competitors (Akimova 2000).

The business level strategy of Samsung’s memory chip business unit is an integrated strategy. Remarkably, they have both a cost advantage and a value advantage over their competitors. In this section we will describe how Samsung “widens the wedge” through cost and value drivers. The data presented in Appendix 1 shows that Samsung’s cost advantage accounts for majority of their competitive advantage.

Competitive advantages are conditions that permit an organization or nation to deliver a decent or administration at a lower cost or in a more alluring manner for clients. These conditions permit the gainful element to produce a bigger number of offers or unrivaled edges than its opposition. Competitive advantages are ascribed to an assortment of components, including cost structure, mark, nature of item offerings, dispersion and system, licensed innovation and customer support. Samsung had settled on the choice to receive design as a wellspring of competitive advantage in the 1990s. Prior, the company 's items had been unsatisfying and undifferentiated. In the mid1990s, the Group administrator, Kun-Hee Lee, started Samsung 's change from a low-end OEM into a world-class gadgets organization. Honing the company 's design aptitudes was a critical part of the activity. Be that as it may, this required significant changes in culture, procedures, and frameworks inside the organization. Samsung understood that competitive advantage can be accomplished through the design innovation. Samsung 's voyage toward design greatness began in 1993. That year, Lee supposedly went by a gadgets store in Los Angeles, USA. He saw, sadly, that the Samsung items in plain view looked ugly, while the results of Sony and some different organizations looked a great deal all the more engaging. He discovered too that the business staff at the store were themselves overlooking the Samsung