The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Milgram Experiment

The Milgram experiment is something interesting to test out, and also ethically wrong to do in my opinion. It’s interesting that Milgram wants to test out if people will be obedient to authority. He conducted a research by having the real subjects to

The Milgram Experiment violates three of the five principles outlined in the Five General Principles of Ethics. Milgram wanted to see if there was a connection between “the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience” (McLeod, 2007). Milgram’s hypothesis that he based his experiment on was “How the German people could permit the extermination of the Jews?” (Dan Chalenor, 2012). The first one that Milgram’s experiment violated was “Principle A: Beneficence and Nonmaleficence” which is where “psychologists strive to benefit those with whom they work and take care to do no harm” (Ethical principles, 2013, p. 3, para. 3). The second principle that was violated was “Principle B: Fidelity and Responsibility” which is where

The Milgram experiment was conducted in 1963 by Stanley Milgram in order to focus on the conflict between obedience to authority and to personal conscience. The experiment consisted of 40 males, aged between 20 and 50, and who’s jobs ranged from unskilled to professional. The roles of this experiment included a learner, teacher, and researcher. The participant was deemed the teacher and was in the same room as the researcher. The learner, who was also a paid actor, was put into the next room and strapped into an electric chair. The teacher administered a test to the learner, and for each question that was incorrect, the learner was to receive an electric shock by the teacher, increasing the level of shock each time. The shock generator ranged from

The Milgram Experiment conducted at Yale University in 1963, focused on whether a person would follow instructions from someone showing authority. Students (actors) were asked questions by the teachers (participants), if the students got the answer wrong they would receive a shock each higher than the previous. The shocks ranged from Slight shock (15v) to Danger! (300v) to XXX (450v). Stanley Milgram wanted to know if people would do things just because someone with authority told them to, even if it was hurting someone. I believe that the experiment was a good way to test the obedience of people

The subjects of the experiment believed that they were taking part in a study on the relationship of learning and punishment. The subject would sit in a room and ask questions to an actor in another room, who was supposed to be another subject. In front of the questioner was a box that had a series of buttons labeled from 15 volts to 450 volts. The subject was told to shock the person every time they answered incorrectly, increasing the voltage each time. As the shocks got worse, the actor would make noise, bang on the wall, yell for help, etc. but the researcher would tell the subject to keep going. Milgrim found, contrary to many psychologists predictions, that sixty-five percent of the subjects delivered the shocks all the way up to 450 volts (Slater).

Stanley Milgram writes about his shocking experiment in “Perils of Obedience.” Milgram writes on the behaviors that the people had during the experiment. Milgram had an experiment that involves two people. One person was a student and the other a teacher. The student was strapped into an electric chair and was required to answer certain questions. The teacher asked a certain word, and the student must know the pair that goes with it. If the student answered the question incorrectly, the teacher must shock the student. Each time the student answered a question incorrectly, the volts increase. Milgram was expecting the teachers to back out of the experiment once they saw the student in pain for the first time, but surprisingly enough, more than sixty percent of the teachers obeyed the experimenter and continued on with the experiment, reaching up to four-hundred-fifty volts. After three times of the four-hundred-fifty volt shock, the experiment was called to halt.

Stanley Milgram, established a new course of study in the psychology of obedience. The purpose of his experiment was to have an idea of to see how people react the autocritical standard; during his experiment, he recorded how people will behave when given a source of power. Milgram gained this idea after the World War II. He believed that some people had the ability to essentially block out human thoughts of morals, ethics, and sympathetics when assigned to a job. The core issue that Milgram faced was finding a way to create a situation to test his theory; because behavior is such a complicated aspect of psychology to test, Milgram had to properly execute the experiment without physical harm from one person to another.

The Milgram experiment was performed by the sociologist Stanley Milgram to discover the power of authority. In this experiment, Stanley was trying to demonstrate the willingness people have to follow orders from an authority figure. Even thought the results of this experiment were very surprising, I think that this kind of experiments would allows us to study and understand better the human’s nature. This experiment showed a side of human’s nature that was unknown by the scientistic community, and this is the reason why we need to perform more experiment like this one.

In 1961 The NSF, National Science Foundation, approved his proposal for his experiment. In the same year Milgram met his future wife Alexandra Menkin, who was both a social worker and a dancer. After being approved Milgram started his experiment in May of 1962, which was called the Milgram Experiment or the Milgram Obedience Experiment. The background of this experiment was inspired by the Jewish men, women and children who were victimized during the Holocaust. His overall question was would people do harm to others if they were told by someone of higher power or intellect to do it. The experiment included 40 male participants as the teachers. The experiment was set up in which there would be a teacher, normally the participant, and a learner, which was shown to be somebody but really was someone working with Milgram. Both participants were told that they were doing research to prove recent psychologist theories that a person learns things correctly when they are punished for making a mistake. Both the teacher and the learner are given a list of terms and words to associate with the terms. The teacher

We live in the world that requests submission to power which are vital for society to work. Yet, dutifulness can have evil consequences for society, as power figures have minimal need to legitimize activities. Stanley Milgram led maybe a standout amongst the most celebrated brain science tests of our times. He led his tests to clarify how the occasions of the holocaust were conceivable.

Ian parker, the author of Obedience, elaborates on the ethical issues of the Milgram experiments. He explains how Milgram struggled to place his findings

The Milgram experiment show how to make people obedient. People learned about milgram Authority figure who is responsible for the results of action. The Milgram participants were 40 males, aged between 20 to 50. Many people volunteer for the Milgram experiment.

Psychologist Jerry Burger of Santa Clara University and writer of the analysis specified the purpose of Stanley Milgram's analysis today. Jerry Burger’s task was made achievable by the investigation that almost everyone in Stanley Milgram’s experiments who go on past the 150-volt level kept on carrying out the shocks right up to the highest of 450 volts, when the experiment was at a halt. It was at the 150-volt level in Stanley Milgram’s researches that the student asked to be discharged from the experiment. Many of the definite experimental subjects pondered at this point, but commonly they kept going, and it showed that this was the crucial outcome, when they persuaded themselves that they’d endured in the analysis no matter what. To ease the odds of long-term psychological risk, Jerry Burger stopped the experiment once it was evident that this urgent 150-volt result was made. The actor who was hiding from the view urgently returned to the study room and revealed that he was in one piece, and the definite experimental subject who portrayed the act of teacher was told of the definite plan of the

Stanley Milgram conducted one of the most controversial psychological experiments of all time: the Milgram Experiment. Milgram was born in a New York hospital to parents that immigrated from Germany. The Holocaust sparked his interest for most of his young life because as he stated, he should have been born into a “German-speaking Jewish community” and “died in a gas chamber.” Milgram soon realized that the only way the “inhumane policies” of the Holocaust could occur, was if a large amount of people “obeyed orders” (Romm, 2015). This influenced the hypothesis of the experiment. How much pain would someone be willing to inflict on another just because an authority figure urged them to do so? The experiment involved a teacher who would ask questions to a concealed learner and a shock system. If the learner answered incorrectly, he would receive a shock. Milgram conducted the experiment many times over the course of 2 years, but the most well-known trial included 65% of participants who were willing to continue until they reached the fatal shock of 450 volts (Romm, 2015). The results of his experiment were so shocking that many people called Milgram’s experiment “unethical.”

Stanley Milgram, a famous social psychologist, and student of Solomon Asch, conducted a controversial experiment in 1961, investigating obedience to authority (1974). The experiment was held to see if a subject would do something an authority figure tells them, even if it conflicts with their personal beliefs and morals. He even once said, "The social psychology of this century reveals a major lesson: often it is not so much the kind of person a man is as the kind of situation in which he finds himself that determines how he will act (Cherry).” This essay will go over what Milgram’s intent was in this experiment and what it really did for society.