The Structural Model: The Bowen And The Structural Model

1121 Words5 Pages
In the focus of assessment, both the Bowen and the Structural model suggest an essential concentration on evaluation. Then again, both models are somewhat dissimilar in the assessment and assessment methodologies. The Bowen model and the Structural model suggest they both regard the family structural unit as a point in theory and generational processes. However, both theoretical concepts search for patterns differently. For example, the Bowenian counseling approach explores the intricate patterns and interactions of intergenerational behaviors amongst the family (Bowen Center for the Study of Family, 2018). However, the Structural family model examines patterns in consideration of such indicators versus the patterns of those that are generational. Interestingly, counselors use a directive approach with their clients as well as having established a familial therapeutic alliance as well as with the family expansion (Karam et al., 2015). The Bowenian therapy differs in counseling in that those members of the family unit resolve unfinished business, and the Structural counselor focuses on restructuring.…show more content…
Whereas, Bowen suggests that family members do not speak to each other and talk directly to the counselor to avoid reactive family members in session with the therapist (Nichols, 2012). However, in Structural therapy, the counselor takes the role of a family member and becomes the focal member in a unit of family conflicts in sessions. Additionally, Bowen postulates that a differentiating of self from the family unit is fulfilled when the relationship is sustained without emotional reactivity or members assuming a part in the triangle (Nichols, 2012, p.
Get Access