The Student Loan Scam Is An Interesting Book

A retrospective look might provide a clue as to how so many Americans landed in the whole “student loan” dilemma in the first place. As discussed in the America article “The Student Debt Crisis” as part of the plan to create a ‘Great Society’ President Lyndon B. Johnson signed into law The Higher Education Act of 1965. The act provided more funding to public colleges and universities, giving them more resources so that students would be able to afford college. Hence, the birth of the student loan (2015).

I owe $40,000, I owe $60,000, I owe $100,000. Isn’t that a lot of money for one person to owe? Graduates have been faced with a serious problem brought about by the constant borrowing of money to gain a reputable education. The debt of loans varies from person to person but the extreme amounts that individuals owe is something the media finds worth gossiping about. Little does the public know, in reality, all the commotion and conversation about these debts are not accountable for the majority of college borrowers. According to A Lifetime of Student Debt? Not Likely by Robin Wilson, she intrigues her targeted college audience by giving examples and providing

Ever since it was turned into a semi-private loan service, Sallie Mae used money to lobby its way in order to become an effective profit-generating machine that fed off the student’s monthly payment while the government just watched as the well-intentioned program went down the drain. In the beginning, Federal student loan started off with the intention of providing equal opportunity in the academic world. For that reason, President Johnson (D) signed the Higher Education Act in 1965 that offered guarantees of low interest, leniency on payments, and options when the student cannot afford to pay it back. In the next presidency, President Nixon (R) expanded the educational program to make it a semi-government program

As of 2016, the average college graduate owes thirty-seven thousand dollars in loans (Glum). As a whole, Americans owe a grand total of 1.3 trillion dollars. These are figures that grow every year, and worse, the number of people who are defaulting on their payments grows as well. The issue of the student loan crisis is serious, which is why potential solutions are now being discussed. Presidential candidates for the election of 2016 have discussed solutions that range from Hillary Clinton’s debt-free college plan to Bernie Sanders’ free tuition plan funded by taxing Wall Street, while numerous scholars and business intellectuals have suggested amending the bankruptcy code to allow for discharging student loans as a solution to the crisis (Josuweit). In this essay, I will primarily discuss the numerous but limited ways amending the bankruptcy code can alleviate the crisis, and then I will offer alternate solutions to supplement the aforementioned solution.

Most developed countries regard and guard their education systems since this platform is perceived to have the ability to hold a country together. This is especially so in the USA, where they aim at achieving 60% higher education attainment by 2025 (Cheny and Geoff 10). Such a milestone will not only affect the economy, but also the social aspect in life positively. However, rising costs of education always act as a major barrier for many students whose parents are low-income earners, thus making it unaffordable. This has resulted in a huge credit debt that not only threatens to cripple the financial sector, but also affects the borrowers’ credibility for a long time. As much as education affects the economy in a positive way, college loans may not be the ultimate solution for students to invest in their future. This is because supplementary aspects in the financial sector will be undesirably affected, a move that can render education inoperable since scarcer jobs will be created; consequently, graduates will not have an opening to apply their expertise and knowledge, and contribute to the economy.

Students are taken advantage of with student loans. Most students cannot afford to go to college and turn to student loans. Usually this is a combination of the students, parents, and financial aids ideas and problem solving in order to afford the schooling at the university or college of choice. The student is the one who signs the agreement that they will pay off the loan. Most students do not read the booklet that you have to read before signing, and most also do not read the small print. Both of these pieces of literature include the interest rates that constitute the bill that the student will have to pay in the future. Students do not read these because they are just so excited to be able to go to college and not have to worry about paying all of it during their schooling.

Kevin Carey’s goal for writing this essay was to reach out to college/university faculty, and Student Affair professionals to call to their attention the crushing problem of students loans and debt and emphasize the need for income-based loans in favor to the system that is now in place that causes students to fall further into debt due to high

After reading about the historic court case of Robert Murphy, an unemployed 65-year-old man fighting to have over $200,000 in student loan debt dismissed through bankruptcy, I began to think “Have I been lied to about my investment in a college education”? Well, the answer is yes; we have all been lied to! Student loan debt is an invisible phantom that follows millions of Americans through their lives. We are told, however, that this invaluable investment is well worth the risk of living in financial destitution for the rest our lives. The truth is it creates even more hardships on Americans in the form of debt. I and millions of others are tired of the lies! If college is going to continuously be America’s golden standard for economic advancement, our next leader needs to fix the affordability of the higher education system and the debt that burdens Americans once and for all.

Not Likely,” goes upon shedding light on to explaining how students end up with the debt that they have. Wilson’s piece goes on to enlighten a situation that people tend not fully to understand. To make her point across she uses different examples of how money tend to add up against individuals attend college and uses the word borrow and make reference to student loans quite often throughout her article. At what appears to be an epidemic sweeping the nation, Wilson points out a number of articles going about saying the there is a disaster of financial storms, which are consuming students who attend colleges, and who use titles like “The Student Loan Scam: The Most Oppressive Debt in U.S. History and How We Can Fight Back” (256-257). She goes on to use an example that stating the majority of students who have debt listed against their name owe no more than a reasonable priced vehicle. Wilson also states in her writings that some borrow money for more than their schooling even cost and will even reach double the amount of what ones schooling actually cost. Any person that is responsible with money should know not to over borrow especially when it is double what something

Key informant interviewee Natalia Abrams, stated that “this is a time where media and politicians are talking about student loan debt but they are only focusing on policy for the new college student, but there needs to be a policy for the 43 million existing borrowers.” There are two separate policy issues that need to be analyzed in order to address the student loan debt crisis. Research shows that there is a difference among default rates based on race and socio economic status. These differences left unchecked can wreak social and economic havoc on society. While student loan debt crisis may not be a crisis for all, the danger is the growing amount of debt that a significant fraction of borrowers are currently saddled with that is preventing

In the U.S. students are encouraged to earn a college degree, but the cost of an education turns many away. “Driven by the allure of a decent salary with a college degree, Americans borrowed to go to school. Outstanding student debt doubled from 2005 to 2010, and by 2012 total student debt in the U.S. economy surpassed $1 trillion” (Mian, Sufi 167). There are plenty of opportunities to obtain funds for college, including one of the most common, student loans. A student loan is defined as “a common way to fund education, specifically college and graduate school, and they provide educational opportunities that you otherwise may not be able to afford” (Barr). Student debt is at an all-time high in America. Over half of all lower income

A summary of Why Do You Think They’re Called For-Profit Colleges? The article, Why Do You Think They’re Called For-Profit Colleges? by Kevin Carey first appeared in The Chronicle of Higher Education on July 25, 2010. In this article, Carey discusses the controversy concerning the billions of dollars in federal aid money received by for-profit colleges. He introduces Michael Clifford, who, according to fastcompany.com, chairs Significant Federation, a private equity firm that is a principal investor in a half-dozen higher-education companies.

And they say students are usually financially unsophisticated borrowers, lacking an understanding of how debts can pile up. The Education Department responds that taxpayers, legislators and the many students who do repay their loans all expect it to pursue those who don't. It says the federal government, the state agencies that administer the program and the private lenders that primarily make the federally guaranteed loans all work with delinquent borrowers. They offer counseling and a chance to refinance at today's low interest rates.

The author concludes that students should do it by themselves with any charges either on the government sites or in their education organization which is school, college or university. Brokers are not the representatives of Government and they can do anything taking the repayment plan from government or bank. Students and their family which is the critical participant of the society doesn’t get benefit from this type of business suggests critical ethical dilemmas occurring in this

As an example, the U.S. Department of Education had been inappropriately paying hundreds of millions in subsidies to Nelnet. This complicated scheme involved a provision in the Higher Education Act that guaranteed lenders a 9.5 percent rate of return for loans funded through nonprofit bonds that had been issued prior to 1993. Held at least a hundred thousand dollars in stock from a student loan company, Student Loan Express, while he was employed at the U.S. Dept. of Education. Money would go out, but more money came in from defaulted loans and these back door deals with lower companies, congress, and schools. The Dept. of Education would back companies like Sallie Mae and make sure that they receive money and what they need to be a top company. The Dept. of Education did not make them change anything when allegations came out about all the wrongs they have done. This way the Dept. of Education and Sallie Mae could share on the massive amounts of profit being made.