This penultimate chapter addresses the final research question, which focuses on understanding the socio-political profiles of the two sets of environmental behaviors. Previous research is unclear and does not provide distinct characterization of who engages in each form of pro-environmental behavior. Thus, the goal of this chapter is to provide evidence that aids in creating a clearer characterization for each. This chapter presents the results from several statistical analyses of traditional set of demographic variables. The variables of interest include age, sex/gender, race/ethnicity, income, education, political party, and political ideology.
Ecology became an issue thrust into the national limelight for all to see. By bringing the issue to the national spotlight, it forced the government to take action as shown in the number of laws and regulations passed in the 1970s. Gottlieb called the 1970s the “Environmental Decade.” By the late 1970s, after the Vietnam War was over and many of the sociological and political issues had subsided several environmental struggles were weakening, possibly due to less sociological interest seen in the 1960s and early 1970s. Environmental efforts in the 1980s experienced a surprising resurgence and became a strong global social undertaking. Many people did not understand some aspects of the environmental movement. One of the reasons for this lack of comprehension may have been diversity. The terms race, gender, and class were not associated with environmentalism as late as 1993. Gottlieb attempts to bring these terms into the environmental movement in Forcing the Spring. Race, gender and class became more important in the environmental movement in the 1990s. Gottlieb attempts to show this new diversity and by doing this he suggest a revised view of the environmental movement. This new view shows environmentalism as a group of "social
Many people do not live ecofriendly lives or find protecting the environment to be important.
Ecosystems is the dynamic complex of plant, animal and micro-organism communities and their non-living environment that work together to form a functional unit and they are constantly changing due to the fluctuating equilibrium from natural stress and human action which has had adversarial impacts on ecosystems. This is evident in Minnamurra rainforest as human induced modifications and environmental stresses had resulted in a vulnerable ecosystem. Furthermore, the removal of factors that contribute to the vulnerability of an ecosystem is important as it affect the functioning of the ecosystem as processes are accelerated, biodiversity is decreased which greatly affects humans. Despite the negative effects caused by humans, they have discovered that ecosystems are susceptible from harm caused by natural environmental factors or human impacts and realised the importance of protecting and managing ecosystems therefore have implemented management strategies that are supposed to prevent further detriment and as a consequence may induce resiliency.
Throughout the novel brave new world consumption plays a vital role in their economic and political system. However the role consumption plays in the world state isn’t much different from the role consumption plays in our society. People may be encouraged to buy things in a different manner, but both systems end with the same product.
Author Derrick Jensen states in “Forget shorter showers,” that simple living will not solve the environmental problem. First, the water, energy, and waste used by industries and agriculture are far greater than the amount used by families. Next, switching to more green technology can still cause more damage than it is intended too. Finally, placing the blame on simple living people is not where the actual problem lies. Orion contributor Derrick Jensen argues, “Municipal waste accounts for only 3% of the total waste production in the united states” (341).
The environment is important to protect considering that people live and breathe in the atmosphere it provides. Investing time in activities that protect the environment hasn’t always been a priority, but as greenhouse gas emissions, the use of energy, and other harmful impacts on the environment increased, individuals began to speak up on what should be done. As the world’s population continues to grow exponentially, the impacts society produces will in turn continue to increase unless something is done about it. Although the idea of an environmentally sustainable community has remained on the minds of the concerned public throughout the past decade, as companies and universities became more invested in the idea, new ways of taking action and implementing policies were developed and pursued.
Frances Lappe challenges the common misconception that consumerism is the main problem when it comes to destroying our planet. The first thing that Lappe sees that is wrong with this is that people won’t jump at this phrase, that this phrase won’t sell. People are most likely aware that as Americans we rely on the purchase of goods and services but people also believe that it is inevitable. If people think that consumerism cannot be avoided then they are not going to want to try and make a change. People also believe that life has always been this way, even though that is not the case, which makes them further believe that change is impossible.
It is now popular to be environmentally conscious in American society. It is completely acknowledged by the populace that oil will, indeed, run out within a lifetime, leaving a demand for a different kind of energy source. Hybrid cars, such as the Prius are now mainstream, recycling is day-to-day, finding organic fruits, vegetables, and meat is as easy as walking to the nearest grocery store, and using plastic bags has been deemed unacceptable. Global warming, while debated and questioned by conservative policymakers has generally been accepted as fact by the population. With any movement, fad, or great change, a great number of people –including corporate media -- want to jump on board the Green Revolution. This is a
The self-explanatory title of this study explores whether or not social norms, specifically involved in encouraging participation in an environmental conservation effort, have an influential effect on individuals who witness different signs encouraging them to do so. This study provides a background analysis on how people, as consumers, drawn to awareness about their behaviors and the ways in which the environment is affected as a result of their actions. Furthermore, because there are people concerned with conservation of resources, this study focuses on the targeted methods and behaviors implemented in order to assist in this increase of awareness and participation and ultimately aid the beneficial cause of saving the environment. The researchers’
“The consumption of some individuals and groups has the potential to negatively affect the “use-value” of other individuals’ consumption.”(Dean Curran, 2017, pg.32) Curran’s ideology intertwines with another sociologist, Allen Johnson, who introduced the concept of “structure” of society, and “agency” of society
Consumerism often causes people to identify with a product or brand on a personal level. Certain products have come to represent different levels of society, with swankier products like muscle cars indicating high class and such products as generic “store brand” shampoo indicating low class. People feel that they have relationships with their favorite brands and products and define themselves by what they buy and own. The mass production of cheap products uses precious fossil fuels at an alarming rate. This has an obvious negative impact on the environment.
Environmentalism has long been accused of being a condition of the affluent – a veritable luxury of the first world condition, despite a resounding deficiency of empirical data to support this assumption. A number of studies countering this point of view are being disseminated, potentially dismantling these postulations (Brechin 1999; Fairbrother 2012; Ignatow 2006; Mart’inez-Alier and Alier 2012), though the cultural disparity explaining a wide variety of environmentalist concerns remains difficult to explain (Brechin 1999), albeit important. Understanding commonalities, more so than polarities, will prove invaluable as we enter an era of globalization and face increased conflict over resource scarcity. A unified approach to solving environmental issues is imperative.
To mitigate the issues that are harming our planet, it is important to know what environmental attitudes and opinions that people embrace today. People’s concerns for the environment range from denial of any environmental problems to an extreme response of distress. Not only is the strength of and individual attitude vital, the type of environmental problem is also significant. Stuart Oskamp and
The purpose of observational methods is to investigate the interaction between people with the surrounding built environment, thus when researching food marketing along Ecclesall Road, the aim of the observation was to see whether restaurants with different marketing techniques attracted contrasting demographic profiles. While observing the marketing techniques and customer base, photographs were taken that documented the feature of interest, including whether outside seating facilities were being used and how the menu was presented to potential customers.