The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Analysis

The most important food aid program in the nation is SNAP, supplemental nutritional assistance. It helped nearly 46.6 million people in 2012. It has an incredible impact on poverty in the United States. Helped to decrease the number of poor people in America in 2011. A lot of people think that because SNAP is fairly generous with the benefit it gives, that it gives some people no incentive to work. Contrary to popular belief, though, SNAP does not give enough aid for someone to live comfortable without having a job. To many, SNAP is a temporary help when the income for the household is low (“HUNGER”).

The modern program was established as part of the War on Poverty in the 1960s but has undergone mass changed since then (Edin, 2014). One being that the government gives out electronic debit cards, rather than stamps, for buying food. Since 2008, the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program has become the largest food assistance program in the U.S. It serves greater than 45 million people in the U.S and is a critical safety net program for health and nutrition in the U.S (The History of SNAP, para.

It has been reported across media that the number of food stamp recipients has increased tremendously, reaching an all time high of 5 million people (Matt, 2013). The amount forgone is approximately $175 million (Matt, 2013). Of this amount, $75 million has been distributed to individuals who do not meet the eligibility criteria (Matt, 2013). In his research study, Matt (2013) indicated that for every $60 in benefits, Texas doled out close to $6.11 to people or recipients who are not eligible (Matt, 2013). The national average stands at $3.05, which shows that Food Stamp fraud in Texas is alarmingly high (Matt, 2013). This shows clearly that Food Stamp fraud is indeed destroying the economic potential of Texas. The amount used in order to provide benefits to fraudsters is supposed to be used in other areas of economic worth. However, believing that the needy citizens are being assisted, Texas has continued to use its revenues for unwarranted courses of action. Furthermore, the food stamp fraud is costing the tax payers immensely. As such, the cost of benefits provided under this program is met by the tax payers. As such, they must pay some income tax, some of which is channeled into the food stamp course. With an increase in the number of recipients, it means that the tax payers have to forgo more. This, as a result, ensures that those who are economically active continue to suffer at the expense of

In the United State, there is a federal nutrition program for low income people to help food budget and buy healthy food. People who have low income in the United States get the food stamps, also known as “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)”. For every month, eligible people who have low income get benefits deposited in to their EBT account. Once they get food stamp, people can purchase food items including seeds and plants to grow food in their house or backyard. It can be used at a grocery store, a supermarket, a farmer 's market, and a shelter that serves meals. However, with all these great benefits, people still eat unhealthy because of too much time consuming, limited money, some food dessert area, and the benefits allow people to eat junk food.

Throughout my research, I have gathered a lot of useful information about food stamps, also known as Common Benefit Identification Card (CBIC) (New). Food stamps are a valuable resource for many lower class families and less fortunate individuals. It is the nation's highest anti-hunger program and helps many people. According to fns.usda.gov, “Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) is an electronic system that allows a recipient to authorize transfer of their government benefits from a Federal account to a retailer account to pay for products received. EBT is used in all 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam. EBT has been implemented in all States since June of

As I drive by 2520 Irving Blvd Street, I distinctly recall what it felt like to walk out of the Department of Workforce Services building after I figured out that my family qualified for food stamps. There wasn’t a rainbow that day, after sharp flowing sprinkles fell from the sky. The parking lot was vacant for the most part. As our family walked to our old, beat up car my mother had shed a tear of relief. For some people that don’t know what food stamps (S.N.A.P.) are, it is benefits from the government usually based on total gross income. The total amount of money the state will provide depends on several criteria. Before you judge, which I odds are you’ve already done, given that I just told you that my family was impermanently on public assistance. First off, my mom tried to do everything right. She stayed up late on Wednesday nights clipping coupons. She baked her own bread. She steered away from credit card debt. She drove a 10-year-old car. She even tried to get her GED except her French is stronger than her English and she couldn’t comprehend much. Amongst the United States is handling an ongoing issue about the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (S.N.A.P.), which is nearly dropping 47 million Americans whom don’t qualify for food stamps. Overall would increasing hardship and food insecurities for families that severely need it. While some people milk the system and don’t benefit our country trying to abuse it we will talk about how great the amount of cuts

The United States does not spend too much on the food stamp (SNAP program) and no one deserves to go hungry. Every year during budget talks the welfare program is a featured topic as the government explores ways to cut the budget. There appears to be a lot of unnecessary spending due to abuse of the system and program administration complexity. There are many areas in which reforms could be instituted and the program could be expanded without misappropriation of funds.

Rather than adhering to a strict set of stereotypical rules regarding eligibility, caseworkers should be give more flexibility and latitude to determine eligibility based on each individual’s unique circumstances, such as student status or unemployment situation. Additionally, individuals in the SNAP program should be given more access to programs and resource that could help them escape whatever situation that caused them to require SNAP to begin with, such as the TRA, a benefit extended to those collecting unemployment benefits. In a CATO Policy Analysis article by Michael Tanner he points out that “according to the USDA nearly 18 million American households remain food insecure” and the food stamp program needs reform. (Snap Failure; The Food Stamp Program Needs Reform, 2013, pg. 1) Currently, the law only allows students to receive SNAP if they have a minimum of a 6 hour school load plus work 20 hours and get paid for work. (Points of Eligibility, 2010, Chapter 5 Section 501). These requirements are more than the standard requirements of a SNAP applicant and these requirements need reformed to be more reasonable for more people to get off of the government treadmill. The regular standards for a one person non-child SNAP applicant only has to work 20 hours a week and employment can be on a paid or unpaid basis. The regular standards for a SNAP applicant do not include any school requirement. (Points of Eligibility,

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the federal Healthy, Hungry-Free, Kids Act 2010 (Public Law: 111-296), provide an overview of the literature, discuss the implementation process, evaluate the policy, and provide explanations for continued support, or provide rationale on why the program should end. The Healthy, Hunger-Free, Kids Act (HHFKA) currently awaits re-authorization, and funding by Congress. The HHFKA was originally included in the Congressional reauthorization process, of the original 1966 Child Nutrition Act, (CNA) which establishing several nutrition programs for school aged children. The CNA was introduced as part of President Johnsons’ “war on poverty” (Matthews, 2014). The Healthy, Hungry-Free, Kids Act 2010, set new

The USDA reported in 2012, that food stamp fraud cost totals 750 million dollars each year and has more than doubled since the 2006-2008 report. This estimate was arrived at by figuring the cost of the program in 2011 to be $75.7 billion dollars and the trafficking is estimated at 1% of this or $750 million. This is a heavy burden that the taxpayers are paying every year even without the fraud but adding the fraud that is not addressed makes it even harder for the taxpayer to stomach (Schoffstall,

According to the Food Research and Action Center, the federal government pays 100 percent of SNAP/Food Stamp program benefits. Federal and State governments share administrative costs. Every 5 years, the SNAP/Food Stamp program is reauthorized by Congress as part of the Farm Bill. The reauthorization establishes who is eligible for SNAP/food Stamps and addresses program access, benefit levels, and other matters.

Formerly known as the Food Stamp Program (FSP), The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest federal nutrition-assistance program and exists to protect low-income Americans from hunger and its associated consequences by increasing access to food. Approximately 44 million people received SNAP benefits this year as of August of 2016.1 Due to the fact that low-income Americans tend to have problems with obesity and poor diet2,3, it would make sense that there would be interest to endorse healthy choices by means of federally nutrition assistance programs.4 However, there is insufficient evidence to require SNAP participants to spend a certain percentage of their benefits on healthy foods because food stamp participation may not contribute to poor diet quality, restrictions may not be effective in changing what food stamp participants purchase, and there is no solid evidence that exists that Food Stamp Program participation directly leads to obesity.

First of all, the governor of Maines’s solution would help a lot with stopping the abuse of food stamps. According to Washington Examiner his solution is that able bodied adults without children would be required to work at least part time. The results of this solution were dramatic, the number of healthy adults without dependents on food stamps fell by more than 90 percent from 13,589 to 1,206. This solution has also promoted employment that is needed in America. This is only one of the solutions in order to solve food stamp abuse.

The Maine welfare system is broken. In 2015, the Maine Department of Health and Human Services reported 1.2 million dollars in welfare fraud (“Department of Health and Human Services” 1); thousands of Maine taxpayer dollars a day were involved in fraudulent activities. Methods such as, falsification of finances and “water dumping” can be attributed to the welfare theft (1). In many cases, welfare recipients participate in these activities in order to further themselves financially or to purchase items that can not be purchased with an electronic benefit transfer card (EBT). Items that can not be purchase with an EBT card include: tobacco products, alcohol, lottery tickets, and tattoos (1). Often times, these outlawed items are used by

In regards to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the purpose of the organization could be described as insuring that eligible, low-income individuals and families have access to nutritional and economic benefits. According to the United Stated Department of Agriculture, SNAP is the largest program in the domestic hunger safety net (USDA, 2016). The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) assists state agencies, nutrition educators, neighborhood, and faith-based organizations to ensure that those deemed eligible for nutritional assistance are able to make informed decisions in regards to applying for the program and are able to access benefits. The FNS also works with state partners and the retail community