The Supreme Court Of The United States

The current Supreme Court is the most powerful branch of government, and one that may shape the course of democracy for generations to come. The current Supreme Court is made up of nine justices. The four oldest justices are 79, 76, 75, and 73 years of age; Five of the nine justices are Conservative Republicans; Three of the justices are women: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan; One of the justices is African-American: Clarence Thomas; and Sonia Sotomayor is the first Hispanic-American to serve on the Supreme Court. Eight of the justices come out of the appellate court system, and Elena Kagan was the solicitor general. The Court today is divided almost equally along partisan lines. On the corporate front, this is an extremist court, a court that has shifted extremely to the far right. In important cases decided 5-4, it is usually the Republican-chosen quintet that provides the victory. The Supreme Court is now a corporate court that by giving big business the advantage is shrinking access to justice for everyday citizens (Edwards, chapter 15 and Bill Moyer).

The courts play a huge role in the criminal justice system. The dual court system of the United States (U.S.) was established through the U.S. constitution. The court systems have a multiple purposes and elements of court. Federal and state court system is what makes up the dual court system of the U.S. Today the U.S. court system is what it is today because of previous legal codes, common law, and the precedent it played in the past. Making the U.S. court system a vital role in the criminal justice system..

took place will be determined and explained as well as the penalties associated with this case will

The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, and the decision is described as follows:

Vote: 7/2. Justia Antonin Scalia delivered the opinion of the court. In which Rehnquist, C.J joined and White, Blackmum, O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter Joined. Steven J. filed an opinion in which Marshal J. joined.

The life of every American citizen, whether they realize it or not, is influenced by one entity--the United States Supreme Court. This part of government ensures that the freedoms of the American people are protected by checking the laws that are passed by Congress and the actions taken by the President. While the judicial branch may have developed later than its counterparts, many of the powers the Supreme Court exercises required years of deliberation to perfect. In the early years of the Supreme Court, one man’s judgement influenced the powers of the court systems for years to come. John Marshall was the chief justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835, and as the only lasting Federalist influence in a newly Democratic-Republican

While I accept that theoretically a judge should not consider extralegal factors when making a ruling, I cannot accept your premise that all judges rule as neutral arbiters who rely solely on precedent, Constitutional text, and original intent of the Framers. As with any other individual in public service, judges are still human beings, and thus bring with them their own prejudices, personal biases, and preconceived notions when taking the bench.

After much debate over the case, the outcome was a 5-4 decision siding with Heller. This outcome affirmed the ruling in the appeals court decision (Background of D.C v. Heller par.20). Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the court’s verdict and was accompanied by the Chief Justice, John Roberts, Jr. Fellow Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito, Jr. made up the rest of the five majority votes.

The U.S. Supreme Court is the ultimate authority in the American legal system and is the central institution that coordinates laws that affect the American society every day. The Supreme Court has issued verdicts on issues that involves the rights of citizens, including those of women, minorities, elderly, disabled, gays, young people, and many others. These changes have had both positive and adverse outcomes that ostensibly improve the status of the American people and defining the rights of lawbreakers. The Supreme Court rulings have had a profound influence on the actions of citizens and the political direction of this country.

John Walker, III, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Board, et al., Petitioners

The Supreme court of Florida, has held that “that the trial court 's exercise of

The Chief Justice that presided over this case was C.J. Rehnquist, the other presiding Justices were J. O'Connor, J. Stevens, J. Souter, J. Breyer, JJ. Thomas, J. Kennedy, J. Scalia, and JJ. Ginsburg. Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion over the case with Justices O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas filed concurring opinions. Whereas, Justices Breyer, Stevens, Souter, and Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion. Before I go into the opinion that Rehnquist delivered I would like to go in to some of the opinions that the other Justices' had stated as to their dissenting opinions.

The Supreme Court said that the state of Florida’s court-ordered manual recount would have been unconstitutional. They voted a 5-4 to end the hand recount of the votes in Florida. Due to the way they were recounting the votes, some by the dimple votes or some counting the hanging chads the U.S Supreme Court stated it was to inconsistent to recount. Five of the justices said the under Florida law the vote was finalized on December 12th. They also said that this ruling was for this case and only this

The Supreme Court said that the state of Florida’s court-ordered a manual recount would have been unconstitutional. They voted a 5-4 to end the hand recount of the votes in Florida. Due to the way they were recounting the votes, some of the dimple votes or some counting the hanging chads the U.S Supreme Court stated it was to inconsistent to recount. Five of the justices said the under Florida law the vote was finalized on December 12th. They also said that this ruling was in this case and only this

There are many different reasons a person can find themselves in a court as the defendant.