The Supreme Court 's Judgment On Roe And Doe

Decent Essays
ealth Care Following the Supreme Court’s judgment on Roe and Doe, among the initial federal legislative reactions was enacting restrictions on the utilization of federal funds for abortions. For instance, there were restrictions on Medicaid money, and this was referred to as the Hyde Amendment. However, the restrictions were challenged almost immediately in the courts. Consequently, two classifications of the public funding cases were heard and judged by the Supreme Court. Principally, these involve funding restrictions for the elective or non-therapeutic abortions and funding limitations for medically necessary or therapeutic abortions. In three connected decisions, the Supreme Court made the judgment that states do not have the constitutional or statutory obligation of funding elective abortions as well as promoting access to the abortions’ public facilities. The decisions were Beal v. Doe, Maher v. Roe and Poelker v. Doe. In Beal v. Doe, it was maintained that not anything in the legislative history or language of the Medicaid (Social Security Act)’s Title XIX required the participating states to finance every medical procedure that fell within the delineated medical care categories. According to the court, it was never inconsistent with the goal of the act to deny funding the unnecessary medical services (Woll 52). Nonetheless, the court indicated that Title XIX permitted states to include non-therapeutic abortions coverage if they choose to do this. On the same note,
Get Access