The Surveillance Of Airport Security

“The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), enacted in 1978, prescribes procedures for physical searches and electronic surveillance of activities of foreign entities and individuals where a significant purpose of the search or surveillance (and the collection of information) is to obtain foreign intelligence information.”(Gilbert 4). This is the part where the Patriot Act and TSA meet this information states that any foreign immigrant that wants to come into the U.S will be background checked and must have a visa. This provides an understanding of the immigrants history as a backup for the best safety as a country. “While rules that pertain to U.S. government access to data and communications have received a lot of attention, most reports have omitted to indicate that most other countries also have laws authorizing government investigations for national security and other purposes.”(Gilbert 3). “These laws tend to provide the respective governments with similar, if not greater, powers of access to data and communication” (US Patriot Act 1). This shows that even other countries want our technology for their investigations to try and stop the criminals all together, but The “Patriot Act. This broad legislative policy gave the government investigative powers to fight against terrorism and subsequently targeted those in the Arab, Muslim” (Akiyama 1) by prejudging society, which raised problems after

I believe that the government has good reasoning to want to go through our phone conversations and e-mails, but that doesn’t make it right. The fourth amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate. This means that they can’t just go against the United States Bill of Rights and dig through people’s electronic devices. Part of the first amendment states you have the freedom of speech. If you have freedom of speech and the government is watching and listening to your conversations and you accidentally say something that sounds like terrorism but you happen to be joking, they can arrest you because they are suspicious. Both

On September 11, 2001 Al-Qaeda attacks the Twin Tower of the World Trade Center. In response to this attack, President George W. Bush administration increases their data capability. “A federal judge sitting on the secret surveillance, panel called the Fisa court would approve a bulk collection order for internet metadata every 90 days.” So does the NSA violate the 4th amendment? According to uscourts.gov “4th Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The 4th Amendment, however, is not granted against all searches and seizures, but only those that are being unreasonable under the law.” On one hand, the 4th amendment and other hand you have the Patriot Act and now called the USA Freedom Act.

The NSA, The National Security Agency that is under the government control was initially intended to protect the USA by tethering through technology devices to attempt to pick up any suspicious activities. The problem is that many feel as if the NSA has no right to evade their privacy. The NSA should be penalize every time they do so, or should have some type of warrant, but only for last resort, or stopped completely. There are many other ways to go about finding troublesome threats like antagonist programs like CDT as I mentioned earlier. Having your privacy tampered with isn’t worth it. The NSA is not needed that bad.

If the NSA were to get a warrant for every single phone call, email, text etc. that they want to go through, to follow the Fourth Amendment, it would take a very long time. Waiting for a warrant slows down the process of catching a suspect, and it can also be blamed for losing new, critical evidence. The NSA has to go to the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) in order to get a warrant which may take some time says David Sirota writer from International Business Times. (Source 1). Both the NSA and the FISA have to make sure that the warrant has a probable cause, and that it obeys the Fourth Amendment (Source 1). It also must be supported by a statement or some other visible fact or evidence, states the Fourth Amendment (Source

There are many good reasons that the Fourth Amendment is in order but there is also the fact that peoples’ privacy can be invaded using this amendment. Communications can be collected and retained, the communications receive no special protection, and nothing would prohibit the NSA from sharing information with military prosecutors. Communications received and given away can also include foreign intelligence information. This Amendment allows the NSA to maintain “knowledge databases” which the databases house internet data, including metadata that reveals online activities, as well as telephone numbers and email addresses that the agency had reason to believe are being used by U.S. people. Whenever a phone “moves into a new service area” updates

Many people feel that the Patriot Act overreaches its original intent by allowing the government to spy on its own citizens, essentially violating American’s civil liberties, most notably our right to privacy granted by our Fourth Amendment in the Bill of Rights, as well as our right to due process granted by the Fifth Amendment in the Bill of Rights.

The Patriot Act violates the civil liberties guaranteed to Americans by undermining the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment gives the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Patriot Act breaches this amendment in multiple ways including “sneak-and-peek” warrants, wiretaps, and bulk data collection. “Sneak-and-peek warrants”, also called delayed-notification warrants, it allows law enforcement to conduct a covert search without informing the suspect of the search until a later time. This infringes the Fourth Amendment, because law enforcement must notify the person that is being searched after the search has taken place. This is unfair to the suspect being searched and goes against the right to secure houses, persons, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches, as stated in the Fourth Amendment. The second way the Patriot Act is in violation the Fourth Amendment and civil

The Fourth Amendment Precludes worry about government trespassing. David Sirota author of the website”Does the government actually understand the 4th Amendment?” says "Mother Jones Reports that an 86 page court ruling determined that the government had violated the spirit of federal surveillance laws and engaged in unconstitutional spying"(understand). Cornell University law school states, "electronic surveillance is also considered a search under the fourth amendment.” (Fourth amendment). Cornell University also states,"A seizure of a person, within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, occurs when the police's conduct would communicate to a reasonable person."(Fourth Amendment).According to the American Civil Liberties Union the NSA examines

The fourth amendment is designed to protect the privacy of its citizens, its ultimate goal is to protect the right of privacy from the arbitrary government. Due to the fourth amendment, the NSA can only record the phone numbers and the duration of citizen’s phone calls, not the content. Nobody can heedfully listen onto the content of your phone calls because of the fourth amendment. As well as phone calls, the NSA can also not read or document your personal emails. If the NSA does conduct any illegal recordings of any sort the information cannot be used in court or to prosecute an individual. Lastly, if the NSA wants to access any information of phone calls or emails of citizens, they must acquire a court order or a warrant to access the information

Although the Fourth amendment protects our privacy and safety the government should be aloud to search our personal property with a search warrant given with a probable cause. A search in the eyes of the Fourth Amendment arises when a governmental employee or agent violates an individual's acceptable idea of privacy explains Cornell University Law school. Also, The American Civil Liberties Union says Fundamental problems say the government can not collect surveillance without probable cause. FISA amendment act signed into law by president Bush in 2008 expanded government authority to monitor Americans electronic communications claims the United states Senate Committee on the Judiciary. David Sirota Author of “Does the government actually understand

According to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Yet, in the United States at this very moment, the government is collecting information on everyone who makes a call, sends an email, plays a video game, or even owns a computer. They are in people’s houses without actually having to be there. This collection of information is unlawful, and unconstitutional, violating exactly what the government

It is better to have civil liberties and a right to privacy than for the government to do whatever they deem necessary to prevent another terrorist attack. First off, the legality of the Patriot act is questionable, several articles had tried to nullify preexisting laws. Before law enforcement can fully begin investigating people or places, they must acquire a search warrant. This law is from Amendment 4 in the Bill of Rights and helps protect citizens from any unjustified searches; however, acquiring a search warrant takes time and is the reason why the Patriot Act tries to get away with working around it. An instance of this occurred in 2002, when George Bush authorized the NSA to monitor phone calls and e-mails of thousands of Americans,

Americans have the right to know what personal information of theirs is being monitored by the government and if the government is operating in a constitutional manner. Although the top priority of government should be to protect Americans from international threats, it must do so without infringing on basic human rights. I believe that the Supreme Court rulings and laws regarding privacy are a good balance of protection and respect to privacy. However, government agencies such as the NSA have certainly overstepped their ground in many cases and abused clauses within the

There are numerous conflicting views on the methods the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to examine a passenger who is going to board a plane. Although the methods use seem necessary for one's safety at airports, passengers feel that full body scans and pat-downs are a violation of their Fourth Amendment and the Privacy Act as Hunter, M.(2010) stated as one of the lawsuits made by a public interest research group. The TSA being able to search you without