The TAT: The Thematic Apperception Test Suzette Lamb Argosy University The TAT test was developed in the 1930s by psychologists Henry A. Murray, Christiana D. Morgan and other colleagues at the Harvard Psychological Clinic. The TAT Test or Thematic Apperception Test is a projective psychological test used to explore the unconscious of an individual in order to reveal the underlying parts of personality, internal conflicts, motives and interests. It has been one of the most widely used, taught and researched of tests of its kind (Combs, 1946). The test evolved over approximately a decade in the 1930’s and 1940’ after a rocky start and three distinct revisions. An earlier manuscript titled “A Method for the Investigation of …show more content…
The TAT test is usually given as one of a battery of tests because it should not be used as the only examination tool when evaluating an individual. Experts also highly recommend getting a personal and medical history before administering. It is important to have this information because medical conditions as well as life events, such as a divorce, can give the examiner some context on what may otherwise be considered unusual or abnormal responses. The TAT is usually administered to an individual in a quiet room where the examiner shows the individual between 10 and 14 cards taken from the full set of 31 TAT cards although Murray recommended the use of 20 cards. Then, in two separate one-hour sessions, the examiner keeps the cards in a pile face down in front of him or her, giving them to the individual one at a time. The individual is asked to tell a story about the picture on each card. There are specific instructions given to the individual to describe what led up to the event in the picture, the event in the picture, the thoughts and feelings of the people in the picture, and the outcome of the story. When the individual is finished, they place the card face down in front of them (Morett, 1997). The examiner usually takes notes on the individuals ‘stories’ by hand. There has been controversy that a lot of
The assessor should record their assessment decision with the criteria met clearly identified. The assessor should follow procedure with regards to making this information available to authorised colleagues and should maintain confidentiality.
· What conclusions did the study reach? Are the conclusions appropriate? Why or why not?
1.What two factors did you investigate in your procedure, and why did you choose to compare these two factors?
The methods used to obtain these results were: From this text of the article I conclude that the
The 13 hypotheses listed in the Literature Review section were statistically tested. Each hypothesis is again listed below along with the
Methodological Issues Article Review. Read the following articles, which can be accessed through the ProQuest database in the Ashford University Library:
To administer the test, an examiner, trained in the field of psychology, presents one inkblot at a time and the person he assesses says what each card portrays based on his emotional, and intellectual state. The examiner keeps notes of clients verbal interpretation as well as his nonverbal behavioral responses, such as silence, facial expressions, and gestures. Next, he asks the client based on which perceptions, internal (personality) and/or external (inkblot) characteristics he utilized or was influenced by in order to respond, and once again the administrator keeps notes. Afterwords, the responses are categorized and evaluated based on client's distinguished observations and/or movements derived from the cards,
Who are its authors? The authors of this test is Sam Goldstein and Jack A. Naglieri.
This tests asks participants to reflect on their behaviors which can sometimes be distressful. In addition, there are some threats to internal and external validity in the data. One being that all the participants will come from one class on a single campus. This is a threat to external validity as it is not representative of the population as a whole but only of students in that particular class. A threat to internal validity is that students may regress to the mean. Students who initially scored extremely high or low on the TAI test may start to move towards average levels of test anxiety over the semester, which would affect the
The purpose of this pilot study [conducted by Corless and colleagues (2004)] was to investigate the
| Based on explicit knowledge and this can be easy and fast to capture and analyse.Results can be generalised to larger populationsCan be repeated – therefore good test re-test reliability and validityStatistical analyses and interpretation are
I believe the TAT test sums up my desire to achieve, and that I see positive relationships of high importance in my life. These intrinsic motivators of striving for success in both academics and relationships are my top priority and the two things I am most passionate about as they increase competence, autonomy and relatedness. As an advocate for the power of education, and my deep care for others and their potential to succeed, I feel that my personality test results demonstrate reasons for being well suited for the major and career path in
The Thematic Apperception Test or TAT was developed during the 1930s by the American psychologist Henry A. Murray and psychoanalyst Christiana D. Morgan at the Harvard Clinic at Harvard University. The TAT is published by Harvard University Press. The cost is $81 per test. The test takes a total of 200 minutes to give. It is given in two 100-minute sessions one day apart. The population that the TAT is given to are ages 4 and over.
In many cases, therapists use these tests to learn qualitative information about a client. Some therapists may use projective tests to encourage the client to discuss issues or examine thoughts and emotions. Additionally, projective tests that do not have standard grading scales tend to lack both validity and reliability. Validity refers to whether or not a test is measuring what it purports to measure, while reliability refers to the consistency of the test results (Cohen, et al., 2013)
The objective of this chapter is to describe the procedures used in the analysis of the data and present the main findings. It also presents the different tests performed to help choose the appropriate model for the study. The chapter concludes by providing thorough statistical interpretation of the findings.