The Technological Revolution Has Changed The Access Of Citizens Within A Democracy

In addition, whistleblowers should be portrayed as being good in order for society to begin seeing them in a positive way. Furthermore, the government should make this type of crimes a public matter. Allowing the public to be able to see all charges and outcome regarding these cases could bring out other wrongdoings in other organizations. The government should also impose greater punishment such as jail time for these types of crimes rather than imposing fines that they are able to

For many whistleblowers, fear of persecution and retaliation has prevented them from speaking out against improper behaviors at their institutions. Because of the dangers that whistleblowers are exposed to, many companies have become proactive in promoting and protecting whistleblowing. As a case and point, we need to look no further than the banking giant, Barclays.

The Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001 (“the Act”) supports the Government’s commitment to the principles of open, honest and accountable governance. It is designed to protect the public interest by: • exposing serious public sector wrongdoing; • ensuring public organisations are responsible and accountable; and • protecting whistleblowers from detrimental action and protecting their privacy.

A whistle-blower is a person who exposes illegal or immoral activity that they have witnessed. This can be knowledge of misused public money, law breaking, unethical actions, or activity that pose risk to public safety. Employees who have witnessed immoral or illegal actions often decide to keep quiet.

The Dodd-Frank Act has allowed for more leniency when it comes to whistleblowing but this legislation was implemented after this story began. There are several industry protection programs for whistleblowers and the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) even promotes whistleblowing by giving out monetary rewards for certain cases. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was supposed to make whistleblowers believe that they would not be retaliated against. However, making the determination of whistleblowing after hearing Tony Menendez’s story will make the weak squeamish and the strong possibly reconsider.

Whistleblowing in the US has long been a controversial topic for many. Whistleblowers are people who work either as outsiders, like journalists, or insiders who uncover secrets from the inside of a corporation- who expose wrongdoings and secrets in the government or businesses. Being a whistleblower is risky business; reputations are put on the line and they commonly face legal trouble. While in the last century Congress has done more to protect these whistleblowers, many people are still on edge about the practice of whistleblowing and protecting it under laws. A big debate that has come to play is whether whistleblowers should be greater protected, or if they should be prosecuted by the law. Whistleblowing has in many instances been extremely helpful to US citizens, and here’s why it should be fully protected by the government.

Whistleblowers are typically just normal American citizens that find out maybe something they shouldn’t. An example is after the 911 attacks, a employ of the NSA was trying to prove a theory he had about the attacks. But instead he found out that the NSA was going against the right of privacy. The NSA was tapping into phone conversations and listening to people's phone calls. So the employee, Thomas Drake, started telling a news reporter of his findings after his boss dismissed his findings. The government was going to far and invading citizens privacies. They knew it was wrong too yet they still did it. But that's not the only case. Many people have found out things and gave it out because citizens have a right to know. There is now laws that protect whistleblowers against corporations so that

A whistleblower is a worker who reports a business 's wrong doing. There are laws that shield whistleblowers from losing their jobs or being abused for reporting unfortunate behaviour. One of these laws is the Whistleblower Protection Act.

To many, the revealing of companies’ private information is an ethically reasonable action that deserves either less punishment than what it does today or no punishment at all. With some punishments for whistleblowing being ostracism, harassment, and demotion, people deem the amercements as unreasonable (Martin). These kinds of punishments are usually doled out to whistleblowers who work for large businesses, making their work environment more hostile and uncomfortable. Whistleblowers get themselves into these situations when they expose information about controversial and illegal actions committed by a company in the hopes that they will face justice or make corrections to their business. As stated by Brian Martin, a social sciences professor,

The number of whistleblowing incidents has increased exponentially in recent years. Two of the most major being Cynthia Cooper and Sherron Watkins (Whistleblowers of both Worldcom and Enron). There has been an increase in exposure of current wrongdoings to the supervisory bodies and enforcement agencies worldwide. (Bowen et al., 2008). It's sometimes said that Ralph Nader came up with the term, but the practice of whistleblowing goes back to the late 19th century. British personnel of the government, in the form of local unarmed police or "bobbies," would "blow the whistle" so that good samaritans could be alerted to help chase and apprehend thieves. (Griscom, 2014). For acts of exposure to be considered "whistleblowing" there

Businesses today, more than ever, are under scrutiny by the public and its stakeholders. With an enormous pressure to be ethical, businesses produce and implement policies for the organization to abide by. On the other hand, it may be easier for businesses to think in their best interest than the interest of the public, causing unethical behavior. Then, a business may have employees that feel an obligation to the public and society to expose its negligence. Whistleblowers are “people who expose negligence, abuse or danger such as professional misconduct or incompetence that exists in the organization in which they work” (Ray 438). Whistleblowing transpires when an employee unearths an action to the public, either out of responsibility to their

The point can be made that “whistleblowing” within a firm, large or small can be encouraged by putting in place policies and a process within a firm that will protect the employee’s and benefit the organisation by:

Hiding one’s identity is nothing new. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay authored The Federalist Papers in 1787 under the pseudonym Publius. The ability to communicate anonymously is viewed as part of our basic right to free speech . With the advent of computers and ease of access to the internet, becoming anonymous as never been easier, and is far more reaching than the colonial newspapers of 1787. For some this ease at which we can communicate anonymously is cause for concern. Although we are no longer hiding our identities to promote the ratification of the Constitution, being anonymous still plays a significant role in our society. Online anonymity grants anyone with an internet connection an unbiased voice, regardless of gender, race, or wealth. Without this freedom to online anonymity, many people would not feel free to express themselves or share sensitive information about themselves. In the case of whistleblowing, anonymity also promotes the release of information to help fight government corruption and oppression. Anonymity can also be used as a security measure and prevent unauthorized mining of personal information by not giving access to our real identities. While the ethics behind anonymity can be foggy, multiple ethical frameworks, including duty-based and just-consequentialism, can be used to add clarity to the topic. A duty-based framework stresses the role of duty and respect for persons, including one’s self. While a just-consequentialism

Hiding one’s identity Is nothing new. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay authored The Federalist Papers in 1787 under pseudonym Publius. The ability to communicate anonymously is viewed as part of our basic right to free speech . With the advent of computers and ease of access to the internet, becoming anonymous as never been easier, and is far more reaching than the colonial newspapers of 1787. For some this ease at which we can communicate anonymous is cause for concern. Although we are no longer hiding our identities to promote the ratification of the Constitution, being anonymous still plays a large role in our society. Online anonymity grants anyone with an internet connection an unbiased voice, regardless of gender, race, or wealth. Without this freedom to online anonymity many people would not feel free to express themselves or release sensitive information about themselves or about corruption, in the case of whistleblowing. Anonymity can also be used as a security measure and prevent unauthorized mining of personal information. Although multiple ethical framework will be used and compared, using a consequence based framework will be the main examining point throughout.

The things whistleblowers do are very serious. One should always remember that such actions may lead to the loss of money and