The Tell Tale Heart Book Vs Movie

I much preferred the movie version to the novel. For me, author William Kennedy’s style of writing is needlessly vague and difficult to follow, yet he did a wonderful job adapting

Have you ever thought of murdering a man for the way he looks and burying him beneath the floorboards? This plot is the same in both the story called “The Tell-Tale Heart,” by Edgar Allan Poe and movie version based on this story. The story is told from a madman’s perspective. He cares for an elderly man who is blind in one eye. The madman always feels this eye is watching him and hence, he murders the elderly man, so the eye will not be watching him anymore. Even though they share this similarity, the story and movie versions are very different. The story version is better than the movie.

I didn’t pick the book over the movie because I think books are boring. When you are watching the movie you don’t have to use your brain that much. When I’m watching a movie about any type of genre that has a book that goes with it, I usually ask questions to myself (in my head) about

The book is better because it gives more excitement and emotion. The book just explains each of the events in great detail. I don’t know about other people, but for me the more information there is, the more I understand it. And in the movie of “The Outsiders”, it does not really say much about what’s going on. For instance, when Johnny dies, in the movie, Ponyboy goes home but it does not tell how long he had been out. In the book, Pony is walking home from the hospital and a man asked him if he wanted a ride (Hinton 151). Though others might think that the movie is better because it visualizes the events that are happening. But, even though it envisions what the book tells about does not mean that it is one hundred percent better.

Many of y’all think that a movie is better than a book because y’all don’t like reading. Neither do i, but in this specific movie and book I liked the book a little better. The reason why is because the book gave more detail about certain situation. For example when lennie imagined about Aunt Clara and the big rabbit. That was not in the movie at all.

“Tell-Tale Heart” and “Godfather Death” are both stories that piqued my interest and kept me reading and brought me back to when I was younger. Both stories brought on a feeling of nostalgia and made me feel happy in a sort of weird way, because they reminded me of when school work was simpler and I had less stress in my day to day life. I did like both stories and I had to read the “Tell-Tale Heart” once or twice more to fully understand it because some of the story confused me the first time that I had read it. I understand the stories because they are both stories that I have heard and read many times before and I can recall many things from both stories even though I may not remember them word for word as they are written. I feel as though

Of the two videos of “The Tell Tale Heart,” the animation was the best. It had a better visual representation of what happened, and showed more detail. It is how he was killed, where he was killed and what happened afterward. It also showed some unnecessary, but interesting details that the story or live action didn’t show. In the movie the man had a red tint to his eye, and in the animation it was the correct blue color. The way the video was laid out was much better, for example in the movie it was poorly timed, and when it was supposed to be night it was day. In the animation the narrator showed much more feeling and emotion as well. In the movie the graphics weren’t the best, most things were hard to see, but in the

Of the two representations of “The Tale-Tale Heart” the animated version was better. I thought that because based on visual clues the animated version was much more detailed. For example, it showed the old man under the floor boards. Also the graphic showed what was happening much better in the animated version compared to the live action video. According to the animated video while they have Poe the narrator wasn't the narrator in the book that we know of the narrator does do everything in the film he does in the book.

Anyways, when it comes to comparing the book and the movie, I think the book is the best for a number of reasons.

So this is what my essay is going to be about. Which is a better choice, the book or the movie? Well, they’re equally good. It truly depends on what the story is mainly about. If it is a story that is more thought-oriented, than a book would better.

Some novels are turned into movies, just like how some short stories are turned into a film; in films, a director usually cannot include every single detail that a book can. In a movie, the audience has a harder time using their imagination, because the director is basically telling the story from their point of view. In a book/novel, the author has the ability to describe/write with the reader in mind. They want to feed the reader just enough information so the reader can use their imagination. In the short story “The Tell-Tale Heart” and The Tell-Tale Heart (1941) are alike thus far different in many ways.

For older audiences, I would choose the book, but for younger audiences I would choose the movie. The movie is simplified for all audiences. While the book is trying to show how literature can change people. The movie doesn’t show the process of how the Little Seamstress changed. In conclusion, the movie was made to entertain

I think that the King Arthur book is better than the movie. My reasons are: The setting and plot of the movie are bad, it doesn’t make much sense and was very confusing, and it has missing information, which is in book. This is why I think the movie is worse than the book and also why I enjoyed the book more.

I like the book more than the movie. In the book, I can really understand who is Arthur and the knights. But in the movie, I cannot recognize their faces. Some of the parts in the movie is 18+, but in the movie, there is non. And the last reason is the book shows events clearly and who does it happens. In the movie, I didn't understand why these things happen. So I think the book is better.

What is better the movie or the book is troublesome question. I prefer reading books because I can imagine the characters, the emotions, whether in the book it is already given. It is rare that the movie and the my imaginations coincide that’s why if I read the book, I wouldn’t watch the movie, and if I watched the movie, I wouldn’t read the book. However, after I read the book and watched the movie, I was satisfied. The movie is a very fine and delicate narration of the book, although it didn’t keep close to the movie. Any-way, it is up to person to decide what is better, tastes differ and one opinion will no necessarily match with another. I do recommend those who haven’t read or watched Pride and Prejudice either to read or to watch it or