The Texas Advanced Placement Analysis

Honors and awards always make students feel proud and encourage to do best next time. I have received many honors and awards during my high school journeys such as Deans' list, A&B Honor roll, Biomedical academy, National Honor Society, National School of High School Scholars and much more.

The general argument made by Berdan in her work, “Participation Trophies Send A Dangerous Message,” is that participation awards commemorate individuals for everyone being a winner. More specifically, Berdan argues that distributing participation trophies to all participants diminishes the meaning of the first, second, or third place trophy. She writes, “When awards are handed out like candy to every child who participates, they diminish in value.” In this passage, Berdan is suggesting that rewarding children constantly with a trophy decreases the value of the trophy that the actual winners earned. Personally, I agree with Berdan because I agree with the concept that providing children with constant rewards sends a dangerous message later in life. On the other hand, writer Eric Priceman defends his opinion that these continuous awards are a necessary part of the education process for young children and will benefit them to strive for better. More specifically, Priceman argues that there is a difference between an award and a reward; he states that an award is given for achievement while a reward is given for accomplishment. He writes, “Just syntax maybe, but anyone that has ever achieved at the highest level has had to endure multiple levels of accomplishment first.” In this passage, Priceman is suggesting that people who have reached the highest levels of trophies and medals have also been encouraged along the way with things such as participation awards. He describes the action of distributing participation awards similarly to encouraging phrases that motivate an individual to strive for greatness. Despite his argument, I believe Priceman is wrong because rewarding children with a meaningless trophy or certificate provides no benefit for them in their future. More specifically, I

The Principal’s Honor Roll Award that has been awarded to me fits into this category because in order to get awarded, I have created a passion and have worked in developing my grades over a period of time. In my last award, it “Certifies that Bryan Garcia Mazariegos successfully completed the Spring 2017 semester with a Grade Point Average of

In this article the author, Eric Priceman, argues that rewarding accomplishments is part of the education processes it only creates a problem when we let it. I feel as though his argument is in fact persuasive and reaches his intended neutral audience. Priceman starts by giving directions in differentiating the terms award and reward. These words are commonly used synonymously and Eric makes an underlying statement that if one is to make this argument, for or against, they must first define these two words. In addition to his initial definition Priceman establishes ethos when he brings up the fact that he has 3 adult children. His credibility is shown because his kids are no longer growing up, they have grown up and he has went through these

Some kids may get stressed due to their grades, and knowing they will be remunerated for all their hard work will make them feel better. For example, I don't get an allowance so sometimes it is difficult paying for my needs. I don't always get good grades, but if I acknowledged that I would get remunerated for all my hard work, I would work harder, and never give up.

When I'm older, I'd love to be able to look at those rewards and remember everything about the sport. Maybe looking at memorabilia will even make a few people get in contact with old teammates and friends and catch up on all the years that have gone by. Not to mention, being reminded of being part of team can be helpful in almost every occupation. These small awards instill the idea in a person's mind that working as a unit can lead to success. Success doesn't always mean coming in first place or being the most valuable player. Success can mean working collaboratively and becoming a family. Clearly, giving participation trophies can lead to many great things in a person's future, including when they look at the awards and remember what they were a part

The general argument made by Arianna Prothero in her work, “Does Paying Kids to Do Well Actually Work,” is that incentives may help boost students to come to school and learn so they may earn a further education. More specifically, Arianna believes that financial incentives have a huge impact on students rather than little rewards. She writes “Incentives are also more likely to work for students who need a little improvement to earn a passing grade.” Schools that use incentives have a better chance of teaching more kids as well as more of them learning what they really need to at school; new material.

Rewards for achievement have been around in many different ways and for a long time. In Ancient Greece, around 1699 A.D, the winners of the Olympic games, didn’t received any trophies, but they did receive other items for participating. Some of the awards that they got were laurel wreaths, tripod vase, a bronze shield or a silver cup. In another part of the world, Ancient Rome participants were given money for participating instead of an award. (Wikipedia) The “new” participation trophies that are handed out to young kids in today’s world are said to have started in the early to mid 1980’s. At a time when the universities and child psychologists began to preach that the educational institutions were stifling children's creativity and self-esteem by using authority. Around this time, the first millennials were born. Now, participation trophies are given to a majority of all young

The general argument made by Arianna Prothero in her work, “Does Paying Kids to Do Well in School Actually Work?”, is why students should be paid as an initiative to go to school. More specifically, she argues that students need a reward for going to school. One example, for having good attendance, the principal put the students in a raffle and two individuals would win a car. She writes, “... economists started looking earnestly at how educators could leverage incentives, such as gift cards, scholarship money, and in some cases cold hard cash, to motivate students to go to school and perform better on tests.” In this passage, the author is suggesting that schools give more incentives to students with good grades and attendance. Although,

In the article “Losing is Good for You”, Ashely Merryman claims that children should not be given awards for something not worth an award such as participation. She states that our youth should not be put under the illusion that winning is as easy as one, two, three. Based on her information, receiving an achievement should be earned instead of given. She stresses the fact that constant praise and awards for possible effortless doings will result in a mindset that believes that putting effort into something will not matter in the end because of the expected praise. With that being said, she believes that constant awarding will lead to underachievement and poor problem-solving skills.

Participation trophies are a widely spread topic, some people argue that children do not learn valuable life lessons by receiving participation awards. Contrarily, people argue that children need participation trophies to help fuel children’s want to do better to win first or second prize. Ashley Merryman, Betty Berdan and Parker Abate wrote three separate articles discussing participation trophies. Participation Trophies need to be done away with because of all the negative consequences that children learn from receiving these trophies.

Participation awards. You’ve probably all received one at some one point or another, but has anyone really wondered why? Why do they exist? What do people think they do? Why would this ever help anyone, ever?

“Rewarding accomplishment is part of the education process, but it needs to be refined properly so everyone understands it” (Priceman). Most people these days take a participation award as a bad thing that they didn’t do good enough, or that they need to grow more in that activity. Some parents tell their kids it’s bad to get a participation award. They also beat them up or get angry that they just participated. When the children become adults, they do that same thing for those children as a ripple effect. This does not help kids see their accomplishment. “ Instead of focusing on everything wrong with a child receiving a participation award, let’s think about what might happen if we never rewarded accomplishment” (Priceman)

First ,it boost young athletes confidence.In the article it states "giving everyone invalid some level of reconsnition goes a long way toward boosting confidence and promoting future success" .This means that by allowing a child to receive some type of a award will have him/her push for something to work for something better.

A reward is a high extrinsic motivator. The reward can be monetary, gift certificate, day off with pay, a two hour lunch, or working for two hours on anything but work. All entice performance and competition in the workplace. A gold star, being the teacher’s helper for a day, no daily