The Texas Education Agency ( Tea )

As the 1990’s approached Ann Richards the democratic gubernatorial nominee wins the governor’s race. Democrats are in control of the Texas legislature and confront a federal court ruling that called for educational funding to across Texas to be equalized. The issue of funding education remains a problem thought the early democratic 90’s to the early Republican 2000s.

In 2015, I wrote about my personal philosophy of the gifted learner. I stated in my paper that, “Giftedness is not a one, set definition. The definition of gifted must encompass intellect, ability, creative talent as well as emotional awareness. It cannot be micro-managed and be a “one size fits all” definition” (Dauber, 2015). People, who are gifted, need differentiation and opportunity to express, demonstrate and show their giftedness. Educators must be able to provide opportunities for the gifted learner to express his/her abilities and/or talents. Gifted students learn differently and require special educational experiences in order to grow academically and achieve their highest potential. Therefore, the education field must be able to understand not only the cognitive side of a gifted learner but the affective or social/emotional aspects too.

I mostly liked and agreed with Collins opinion about Texas education system. I do think our education system is not that great. Most of our students drop out during high school, some do not continue their study after high school, there are few who move forward to have bachelors and so forth. I found it funny how Collins describes Texas as being first in size, agricultural products, production in oil but thirty ninth in education, which does explain a lot. Texas have problems with the education system, most states have the education system different and better than us, which also Collins states. Our education was so bad that when twenty three percent young men drafted for world war two, they were too badly educated to qualify for the military.

Education development has been an important matter in Texas for decades. Texas has been known for their improvements and reformation in public schools since their first attempt of a public school system. Within these improvements, came issues that escalated to create our public education system today. The issues that helped arrange the system are desegregation, equity in funding, and education policy.

The education conflict in Texas is a major factor of chaos. There is kids without college tuitions. The 2011 Texas Legislature chopped more than a billion dollars from higher education, dashing the dream of college for many Texas students. While scholarships disappeared, many campuses were forced to raise tuition costs, a deadly combination for families without the resources to make up the difference.

One of the difficulties in identifying the needs of low-income students is the profound cultural barriers which exist that prevent their strengths and deficits from being identified. Children from low-income homes frequently have poorer vocabularies and a weaker basis of the type of knowledge that is frequently considered 'intelligence' on most forms of assessment. A low-income child's IQ may be high, even though he lacks a framework of accepted middle-class knowledge. "In January 2003, the National Academy of Sciences released a report on the seeming overrepresentation of minorities in special education and underrepresentation of those students in gifted education. The NRC reported that, nationwide, 7.47 percent of all white students and 9.9 percent of Asian students are placed in gifted programs. Meanwhile, 3.04 percent of African-American students, 3.57 percent of Hispanic students, and 4.86 percent of American Indian students are classified as gifted" (GT-minority identification, 2003, ERIC Clearinghouse). The discrepancy, the NAS believed, could not be solely explained by talent alone but was at least partially rooted in the methods of identifying students labeled as gifted. Biases in standardized and other tests identifying student strengths, combined with prejudices, however unintentional, amongst educators and administrators lead to under-identification of the gifted

The current state of the Texas education policy is very complex and its roots can be traced all the way back to times were there was no equality in the public school system, we can even say it can be traced as far back to the state’s split from Mexico. This was a very problematic situation that began to be reformed heavily starting in 1954. The legislations that passed to resolve this problem have morphed the Texas Public education policy into what it is today.

The elementary educators both viewed the strengths of the program as flexibility to servicing the students, and being able to work with students in small groups. The middle school teacher thought that the participation of the general education teachers in the program was a definite strength. Among the weaknesses, teachers thought scheduling was difficult, and there is not enough staff to service the students. Also, teachers thought it was difficult to provide consistency of services and communication throughout all the buildings in the district. The middle school ELL teacher also noticed a lack of formal assessments and progress monitoring to help meet the changing needs of the students. The teachers’ goals addressed these weaknesses. They wanted to improve communication, and consistency of the ELL program, learn more about assessing Ells and ensure that the current ELL program moves forward. The elementary teacher also thought it was important to keep ELL students a priority even though our district doesn’t have many students who qualify. I also thought it was interesting that the middle school teacher also wants to provide general educations teachers with more support and guidance. I think that is a great goal that will help the students and the teachers!

High quality education is a must in U.S. since it means that today's youth will be prepared with the knowledge needed to tackle our nations issues. When looking from state to state, you will notice how various states differ in how well they are able to educate students. Maryland was ranked number one in the nation by having a high grade point average amongst students and an equally high graduation rate. Texas on the other hand had the worst grade point average and graduation rate. The reason for this is the amount of funding that goes into public schools. Maryland puts a lot of funding into their public schools which helps raise grade point averages. Meanwhile Texas puts little funding into public schools and

Texas Education Agency (TEA) mandates that the ARD team will make assessment accommodations based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) (replacing Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) curriculum) in the student’s IEP (Using The manual for parents and students about special education services in Texas, 2012, p. 48). To ensure that the accommodations in the IEP are being followed I would start with a discussion with all involved staff members. In this discussion, which could occur during IEP meetings, staff could provide input on how they specifically plan to implement accommodations in their specific environment. Additionally, teachers should be provided a copy of the IEP for reference. For example,

The role of Legislators and courts have played in the Texas Education System has been miserably unsuccessful. Citizens have been concerned about the education of their young for years. The reason is that it has failed to establish any public system of education that is equal to all students, which seems to be redundant and keeps rearing its ugly head in Texas history. Public education has to meet the needs of Texas students. Public education in the Texas will play a major role in shaping of our state in the future. The schools in low income have often assumed the position of unjust, while children in better schools enjoy the luxury of a solid education. This relationship of education to the views of Texas is prevalent throughout the low income.

Site Based Decision Making, more commonly referred to as SBDM, was mandated by the state of Texas for implementation in 1992. The Texas Education Agency (TEA) set the definition of SBDM in 2010 as:

Now a day’s Texas is growing profoundly, but as it cultivates so does its problems. One of the major issues facing Texas today is in the education department. The matter ranges from school funding to standardized testing. Not only are students themselves complaining about the matters at hand but also parents, some teachers, and even state legislature. There have always been five major issues in Texas education; school finance, school choice, expanding pre-kindergarten, school calendar, and testing. Of these issues you could never think of them separately because no matter how hard you try they will, in the end, affect one another.

The ELL team within District 427 is a small but effective group of 5 individuals. The teachers and administrators that are involved with the ELs are extremely passionate and constantly working with the numbers that they have to better service their students. The team meets frequently and is in constant contact within one another to help each other overcome obstacles that are occurring within their classrooms with their EL students. Although the team is small, they are only servicing a small population, and always open to change. If the EL enrollment were to increase, the team would increase as well. Their goal is to ensure that all of the students are being serviced for all of their needs for success.

The topic of gifted and talented education is one that has always sparked debates among parents and teachers, and recent movements towards totally integrating classrooms have added to this debate. For many years now, "average" children, gifted and